MorningBird wrote...
Gotta agree with that. I was just curious about the context of the (15 page old?) debate because I'm rarely around for such things.
I can relate more to PC's having that kind of view because, as I mentioned, I prefer to play characters that have nothing to do with myself. So from my perspective, playing a character with that kind of view/perspective is relatable. The player finding Fenris' bisexuality as effeminate is more... confusing to me? Partly because we do know so little about the character's history.
Any word on why Fenris being bi was seen as... less masculine? You said it was already covered, but I... don't like digging through pages. >> Lazy, I know.
I can't even begin to cover everything (and I'm also too lazy to comb for links, lol) but one of the better points had to do with physical appearance. As a male elf, Fenris is a visually attractive counterpart to a female human, but he looks a little dwarfed (no pun intended) standing beside male Hawke and his uber buffness. The larger partner is usually seen as dominant (I am considering both height and breadth, and I know that my first impression of, say, a Qunari woman and a human man would be that she is physically dominant by an edge) and the smaller one is less so, which in men decreases people's concept of their masculinity (and in women has the opposite affect). It was debated that Anders, however, being physically on par with Hawke (he is quite the buff little mage) could be with M/Hawke and would aesthetically appear equal.
Anyway, short version: Fenris beside f/Hawke = he looks like the protector, and Fenris beside m/Hawke = he looks like the one being protected. Being protected instead of the protector appears by typical standards as less masculine.
I don't think him being bi descreases his masculinity or his mystery, but I do prefer the visual (art wise) of him with Hawkette. For me, they balance better, and going by the same artistic desire for balance, I prefer m/Hawke with Anders or Aveline (alas, the later isn't to be). Of course, my playthrough will have more to do with their personalities when it comes down to it. I should say that in some case, I prefer a good size difference, but it has a lot to do with how each character appears.
It's silly to place gender roles or top/bottom roles based on appearance, but visual impressions DO go far and everyone has a right to interpret them as they see fit. The debate went on for a while, and I think mostly it was agreed to disagree, though I was ridiculously tired at the time and my memory might be faulty.