greengoron89 wrote...
Alright, which one of you guys wrote this user review on Metacritic?Merrill4Life said...
Skyrim is supposed to be Bethesda's response to the smash hit
Dragon Age II yet it fails to measure up on all levels. The character
development system is boring and almost arcane in it's complexity,
compare this to Bioware's talent tree system which let's you pick what you
need and quickly get right back into the action. The world seems empty
and barren for the most part leaving you to wander aimlessly without the
focus and direction provided by the dungeons in DA2. Also none of the
towns and cities even come close to recreating the vibrancy and magic of
Kirkwall. If you have played any FPS before then you have basically played
Skryim, the gameplay is totally lacking of any tactics and depth.
Bethesda's most obvious attempt to ride Bioware's coattail's, however,
is shown by how it prominently features Dragons in the main story, I
wouldn't be at all surprised if they were slapped with a lawsuit for
copyright infringement. If Bethesda would spend more money on
development instead of bribing game reviewers they may have been able to
push out a decent product. It's no wonder RPGs are becoming less
relevant, it's because companies like Bethesdea, Cdprojekt, and Eidos
keep rushing out FPSs in RPG clothing to appeal to the CoD crowd. Stay
away from this trite and unimaginative game, if you must get your FPS
fix get Battlefield 3 or better yet wait for Mass Effect 3. There is a
reason Dragon Age II was proclaimed "Game of the Decade" and Skyrim
falls flat on it's face in it's attempt to take the crown.
Son, I am disappoint.
Troll review is troll.





Retour en haut





