Aller au contenu

Photo

The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim Discussion Thread


37007 réponses à ce sujet

#12726
phaonica

phaonica
  • Members
  • 3 435 messages

Nashiktal wrote...
The truce with the thalmor was a temporary stopgap that no one is seriously taking it as a long term deal.


I haven't played Imperial side yet, so bear with me. Do the Imperials express that they're using the peace time with the Thalmor to plan a new offensive against the Thalmor? Or do they think the Thalmor will eventually attack again? Or what?

#12727
Addai

Addai
  • Members
  • 25 850 messages

Costin_Razvan wrote...
And that would destroy the Empire. What do you think the Empire would let Skyrim fall and then not do anything afterward?

Better that the fool who agreed with that peace treaty die so we can have a new Emperor.

So what?  And unless there is a strong successor already in place, killing the emperor is only likely to lead to more chaos.

@ phaonica:  They do all say that they consider the treaty only a temporary measure and they want to continue the war with the Thalmor when the empire has regrouped.  So they say.  And the empire under current leadership wasn't able to win before when it was strong, so I don't see how an empire actively working with the Thalmor is going to do any better.  Skyrim will be doing them a favor by kicking the Thalmor out so that they along with an independent Hammerfell can regroup without interference.

Modifié par Addai67, 03 décembre 2011 - 07:56 .


#12728
marbatico

marbatico
  • Members
  • 2 323 messages
does the bleeding perk for one-handed axes do anything? i got the perk, but i dont really see a change

#12729
AngryFrozenWater

AngryFrozenWater
  • Members
  • 9 182 messages
BTW, the emperor dies in this game.

#12730
phaonica

phaonica
  • Members
  • 3 435 messages

Addai67 wrote...
They do all say that they consider the treaty only a temporary measure and they want to continue the war with the Thalmor when the empire has regrouped.  So they say.


It's just that, if it is a common sentiment that the Imperials do plan an attack against the Thalmor , the fighting between the Imperials and Stormcloaks does seem counterproductive.

And the empire under current leadership wasn't able to win before when it was strong, so I don't see how an empire actively working with the Thalmor is going to do any better.

I played Skyrim more as a romantic than a realist. Better to die fighting for freedom than to live in peace as a slave.

#12731
Costin_Razvan

Costin_Razvan
  • Members
  • 7 010 messages

So what? And unless there is a strong successor already in place, killing the emperor is only likely to lead to more chaos.



How exactly do you suppose Skyrim will survive huh? Care to offer a reasonable argument as to how they would achieve that?

The Redguards stopped the Dominion, but with a massive cost to Hammerfell. Rebelions and Revolutions might all seem fine and dandy to you but as someone who'se lived in a country that 20 years ago had a revolution where thousands died I can safely say that stability is much better then the logic that SOMEHOW a revolution can lead to something better.

That it COULD doesn't mean it WILL.

Modifié par Costin_Razvan, 03 décembre 2011 - 08:12 .


#12732
BASARAfreak

BASARAfreak
  • Members
  • 20 messages
I prefer to play Skyrim than Dragon Age because you don't get a hassle of having pre-order items.

#12733
AventuroLegendary

AventuroLegendary
  • Members
  • 7 146 messages
Over all of this Imperial vs Stormcloak dicussion, I'm wondering on what Bethesda counts as canon just like Obsidian with the Legion vs NCR.

#12734
Giggles_Manically

Giggles_Manically
  • Members
  • 13 708 messages
I would care about the civil war but really there is so many distractions right now to even bother with it.

Maybe after I smith some more, or do some more side quests....or you know.

Tell me to go to point A I end up hitting point X,Q, and R before I think of going to A.

#12735
phaonica

phaonica
  • Members
  • 3 435 messages

Giggles_Manically wrote...

I would care about the civil war but really there is so many distractions right now to even bother with it.

Maybe after I smith some more, or do some more side quests....or you know.

Tell me to go to point A I end up hitting point X,Q, and R before I think of going to A.


To me, the civil war storyline was the most interesting one, and I found myself wanting to do those missions more than anything else.  ^_^

And I ended up turning down a LOT of fetch quests. No, lady in Riften, I will not retrieve both the spoon you left in Solitude and the box you left in Markarth <_<

#12736
Morroian

Morroian
  • Members
  • 6 396 messages

phaonica wrote...

Nashiktal wrote...
The truce with the thalmor was a temporary stopgap that no one is seriously taking it as a long term deal.


I haven't played Imperial side yet, so bear with me. Do the Imperials express that they're using the peace time with the Thalmor to plan a new offensive against the Thalmor? 


Yes this is explicitly said ingame.

#12737
Dragoonlordz

Dragoonlordz
  • Members
  • 9 920 messages

phaonica wrote...

Giggles_Manically wrote...

I would care about the civil war but really there is so many distractions right now to even bother with it.

Maybe after I smith some more, or do some more side quests....or you know.

Tell me to go to point A I end up hitting point X,Q, and R before I think of going to A.


To me, the civil war storyline was the most interesting one, and I found myself wanting to do those missions more than anything else.  ^_^

And I ended up turning down a LOT of fetch quests. No, lady in Riften, I will not retrieve both the spoon you left in Solitude and the box you left in Markarth <_<


Oh didn't you know? When combine those two items you get baby pet dragon. Ah well, your loss I guess.:wizard:

Modifié par Dragoonlordz, 03 décembre 2011 - 08:46 .


#12738
phaonica

phaonica
  • Members
  • 3 435 messages

Morroian wrote...

phaonica wrote...

Nashiktal wrote...
The truce with the thalmor was a temporary stopgap that no one is seriously taking it as a long term deal.


I haven't played Imperial side yet, so bear with me. Do the Imperials express that they're using the peace time with the Thalmor to plan a new offensive against the Thalmor? 


Yes this is explicitly said ingame.


So why do the Imperials think it's more important to fight the Stormcloaks, instead of surrendering/joining causes? Do they think that it's too early to fight back against the Thalmor, or since they believe Ulfric is only interested in the crown that Ulfric wouldn't be further interested in a joint cause?

#12739
Morroian

Morroian
  • Members
  • 6 396 messages

greengoron89 wrote...

Morroian wrote...

Yet the ghettos still exist and there are Nords racially abusing them with impunity, none of which you see elsewhere so blatantly. None of which exists afterward in Windhelm if you side with the Imperials.


As callous as it might be, I honestly don't care about that - there are bigger priorities than prettying up the Gray Quarter and making its denizens feel warm and cozy. As has been said multiple times, a lot of them have overcome the prejudice of the Nords and made something of themselves - and that fact holds a lot of weight in this discussion, whether you want to acknowledge it or not.

Some of them have and that doesn't excuse the racism or letting it flourish. As for priorities, its more what it signifies about Ulfric and his underlying motivations and what a Skyim under his rule would be like, plus its not like its a recent thing that he doesn't have time to fix because at the moment he's planning his strategy.

#12740
phaonica

phaonica
  • Members
  • 3 435 messages

Dragoonlordz wrote...

Oh didn't you know? When combine those two items you get baby pet dragon. Ah well, your loss I guess.:wizard:


Pics or it didn't happen. :devil:

#12741
Morroian

Morroian
  • Members
  • 6 396 messages

phaonica wrote...

So why do the Imperials think it's more important to fight the Stormcloaks, instead of surrendering/joining causes? Do they think that it's too early to fight back against the Thalmor, or since they believe Ulfric is only interested in the crown that Ulfric wouldn't be further interested in a joint cause?


Ulfric gives every indication that he isn't interested in a joint cause. He'd throw the imperials out and that would be that.

#12742
Addai

Addai
  • Members
  • 25 850 messages

Costin_Razvan wrote...

So what? And unless there is a strong successor already in place, killing the emperor is only likely to lead to more chaos.



How exactly do you suppose Skyrim will survive huh? Care to offer a reasonable argument as to how they would achieve that?

The Redguards stopped the Dominion, but with a massive cost to Hammerfell. Rebelions and Revolutions might all seem fine and dandy to you but as someone who'se lived in a country that 20 years ago had a revolution where thousands died I can safely say that stability is much better then the logic that SOMEHOW a revolution can lead to something better.

That it COULD doesn't mean it WILL.

Costin, you think anyone who disagrees with you is offering an unreasonable argument.  But for old time's sake...  Yes, Hammerfell did survive, and they beat the Thalmor.  That proves it is possible.  Redguard might have the fiercest warriors in Tamriel, but Skyrim is second to that, plus they have very inhospitable terrain and the Thalmor have been bloodied along with everyone else.  Independent Nords will also be defending their homes if the Thalmor invade, not bleeding for Cyrodiil.  They've already done enough for them- the Nords are the ones who saved the Imperial City, and look at the thanks they get.

What "stability"?  That's gone no matter which side you pick.

#12743
Addai

Addai
  • Members
  • 25 850 messages

Morroian wrote...

phaonica wrote...

So why do the Imperials think it's more important to fight the Stormcloaks, instead of surrendering/joining causes? Do they think that it's too early to fight back against the Thalmor, or since they believe Ulfric is only interested in the crown that Ulfric wouldn't be further interested in a joint cause?


Ulfric gives every indication that he isn't interested in a joint cause. He'd throw the imperials out and that would be that.

No, they explicitly say their goal is to defeat the Thalmor, but they can't do that when the Imperials are in bed with the Thalmor and letting them have the run of Skyrim.

#12744
Addai

Addai
  • Members
  • 25 850 messages

Morroian wrote...
Some of them have and that doesn't excuse the racism or letting it flourish. As for priorities, its more what it signifies about Ulfric and his underlying motivations and what a Skyim under his rule would be like, plus its not like its a recent thing that he doesn't have time to fix because at the moment he's planning his strategy.

It's not a "priority."  He's not actively persecuting other races.  If you talk to Dunmer or Bretons elsewhere, they all say the same thing- Skyrim is inhospitable to other races.  And yet some of them manage to establish themselves and even have their own enclaves.  The Khajiit traders say they came there voluntarily to profit from the chaos.  The b*tching simply nets no sympathy from me, especially since we're only talking increments of difference between Ulfric and the Imperials on this subject.

#12745
phaonica

phaonica
  • Members
  • 3 435 messages

Morroian wrote...

phaonica wrote...

So why do the Imperials think it's more important to fight the Stormcloaks, instead of surrendering/joining causes? Do they think that it's too early to fight back against the Thalmor, or since they believe Ulfric is only interested in the crown that Ulfric wouldn't be further interested in a joint cause?


Ulfric gives every indication that he isn't interested in a joint cause. He'd throw the imperials out and that would be that.


What indication? He got along with the Empire just fine until the Thalmor got involved.

#12746
Nashiktal

Nashiktal
  • Members
  • 5 584 messages
And again the imperials only signed the treaty so they could rebuild and consolidate. Hell the talos ban wasn't even all that serious and some of the nords even say that (they cite a different reason for their anger but that escapes me at the moment). And even then the empire plans on going to war against the thalmor in a couple of years.

Too bad the fighting over skyrim is pointless and helps NO ONE. The storm cloaks can't even fight a straight up battle unless the dragon born supports them, what happens when thalmor mage armies come forth? One guy with shouts is not going to save them.

Hell its not even specifically that the empire is going to save the day, its that a united front is needed against the elves. Hammerfell is nice and cozy in their area, and rightly mad about the empire trying to cede some of their lands, but when skryim and the empire falls, that is two less fronts for the thalmor to worry about and so many more resources for them to conquer their few remaining enemies.

The way I see it is like this. If skyrim wins their independance, and cuts the empire off from not only skyrim's resources, but its other province cut off from its loss of land, it will be severely weakened and stand little chance against the thalmor. Once the empire falls, that leaves four individual provinces with no ties to each other isolated and cut off by vast tracks of thalmor land. Since skyrim is xenophobic under ulfric it is the most logical first choice to invade, and by itself it will likely fall fairly quickly.

That leaves three major provinces left to face the thalmor. Hammerfell, highrock, and blackmarsh/morrowind.

I could see hammerfell and high rock forming an alliance, which leaves two separate fronts for the thalmor to face, and both are tough targets. In all likelihood they will keep a peace pact under one while invading the other. Where it goes from there who knows... but I can say with confidence skyrim will have no future without the empire's resources, and the empire will have no future without skyrim's troops and access to highrock.

#12747
sympathyforsaren

sympathyforsaren
  • Members
  • 334 messages
The Stormcloak/Imperial debate on which is more reasonable is missing a key ingredient that isn't known, but is in the soul of the series: What is the next prophetic event of The Elder Scrolls? What will the Elder Scrolls foretell of next? Until that is known, you can't tell. But again, I would argue that Imperials are already controlled entirely by the Thalmor.

We can't forget about the Psijic Order, either.

#12748
sympathyforsaren

sympathyforsaren
  • Members
  • 334 messages
Bethesda's story of political turmoil is many times more interesting than Dragon Age 2. Yes, indeed....a Bethesda story better than a BioWare one. Characterization isn't quite as good, but mega kudos to Bethesda. Not saying its the greatest ever, but I'm more and more impressed by Bethesda writing the more and more I get into the main quest and factions. Side quests are great, too....the Dawnstar nightmare sidequest was very, very well written and the voice actor of your companion was brilliant.

#12749
phaonica

phaonica
  • Members
  • 3 435 messages

Addai67 wrote...
 The b*tching simply nets no sympathy from me, especially since we're only talking increments of difference between Ulfric and the Imperials on this subject.


And it's not like the Dunmer and the Empire themselves have never persecuted anyone, either. If I remember right, the Empire protected slavery laws in Morrowind.

Edit for Reference:

"Even the former slave race Imperials pursued slavery, as Tiber Septim's army sold captive Bretons into slavery after the Battle of Sancre Tor.
Perhaps influenced by these historic events, slavery is now illegal throughout the Empire, but protected by law in Morrowind. This exception was granted by Tiber Septim in the Armistice of 2E 896 as a concession to the Dunmer, who saw the use of slaves as their ancient right" (http://www.uesp.net/...rrowind:Slavery)

Modifié par phaonica, 03 décembre 2011 - 09:46 .


#12750
phaonica

phaonica
  • Members
  • 3 435 messages

Nashiktal wrote...
Too bad the fighting over skyrim is pointless and helps NO ONE. The storm cloaks can't even fight a straight up battle unless the dragon born supports them, what happens when thalmor mage armies come forth? One guy with shouts is not going to save them.

The same could be said for the Empire, couldn't it? Without the Dragonborn's involvment, the civil war seems to be at a stalemate.

The way I see it is like this. If skyrim wins their independance, and cuts the empire off from not only skyrim's resources, but its other province cut off from its loss of land, it will be severely weakened and stand little chance against the thalmor. Once the empire falls, that leaves four individual provinces with no ties to each other isolated and cut off by vast tracks of thalmor land. Since skyrim is xenophobic under ulfric it is the most logical first choice to invade, and by itself it will likely fall fairly quickly.


The way I see it, both the Empire and Ulfric are equally wrong in continuing the civil war. For all that Ulfric refuses to back down, the Empire doesn't need to fight him. They share a common enemy in the Thalmor. Skyrim doesn't have to be part of the Empire for them to ally against the Thalmor.