63 réponses à ce sujet

[Rekkampum]

JamieCOTC wrote...

My problem w/ Shepard dying at the end of ME3 is that s/he already did die ... in the beginning of ME2. I've already seen Shep die (and what a meaningless death it was) so that sort of weakens the emotional punch some what, at least for me. I'm sure there will be a ending where s/he will die, but BW shot themselves in the foot w/ the idiotic ME2 resurrection. For me, at least, it's not really a question of if Shep will die, but how is BW going to sell it?

I don't think the "resurrection" is idiotic, since they did use a sketchy of area of science to justify it - cybernetics, in Shepard's case - but I'd love to see the real emotional weight of the game focusing on something larger than simply the threat of him dying. Just like in the Suicide Mission, what I loved about it was not only the prospect that Shepard could die, but also the possibility that people Shepard had bonded with could also perish. In ME 3's case, the threat is much larger - the stakes of Humanity and ultimately, the galaxy - and as long as we are reminded of this in Shepard's death (should it be possible) then I'm perfectly okay with it.

[KisTheMaster]

me3 wont be the lart part od mass universe. I thinkbio will create prequel, and see how shepard growing, or we will play cpt. Anderson, or saren or...

[Robuthad]

I would preferably live through the whole series. Im sure Bioware will put in an ending where Shep dies and whole thing is EPIC FAIL. But you can be 90% sure they wont force you to die.



I would almost like to see the very end of the game not be the destruction of the Reapers but the time right after when everyone is rebuilding.



Then perhaps an Epic gathering of all the Species of the Galaxy all coming together to forge an Alliance. With Shepard being the guest of honor.

[JamieCOTC]

Rekkampum wrote...

JamieCOTC wrote...

My problem w/ Shepard dying at the end of ME3 is that s/he already did die ... in the beginning of ME2. I've already seen Shep die (and what a meaningless death it was) so that sort of weakens the emotional punch some what, at least for me. I'm sure there will be a ending where s/he will die, but BW shot themselves in the foot w/ the idiotic ME2 resurrection. For me, at least, it's not really a question of if Shep will die, but how is BW going to sell it?

I don't think the "resurrection" is idiotic, since they did use a sketchy of area of science to justify it - cybernetics, in Shepard's case - but I'd love to see the real emotional weight of the game focusing on something larger than simply the threat of him dying. Just like in the Suicide Mission, what I loved about it was not only the prospect that Shepard could die, but also the possibility that people Shepard had bonded with could also perish. In ME 3's case, the threat is much larger - the stakes of Humanity and ultimately, the galaxy - and as long as we are reminded of this in Shepard's death (should it be possible) then I'm perfectly okay with it.

Good point and I totally agree w/ you on that. 

[Sir Ulrich Von Lichenstien]

chmarr wrote...

shepard should be at least injured at the start of ME3, BUT on another note ME3 should read data from the ME2 savegame to workout who is still alive and maybe just MAYBE have it read data from the ME1 savegame that way it will mix and match both things on them.

like if you played ME1 and kaiden survived and you did not import the save to ME2 and kaiden died the game SHOULD automaticly make it that kaiden is in a deathly coma where you the player have a certain amount of time to save or euthinaize aiden.

(kaiden is just one of many varibles so bear with me)

it should make assumptions on who lived and died on the first 2 and make a new save game based on the data avalible so heres hoping

Your middle paragraph makes no sense whatsoever.

Somehow I doubt your going to be able to import an ME save file directly into ME3. Even if it did, Kaiden would still have survived because you got him to survive Virmire in your ME save. You can't merge an ME save with a default ME2 save to make 1 save going into ME3. They are 2 seperate characters.

ME3 will take into account anything from the first 2 games that are carried over in an ME2 to ME3 save or if for some crazy reason they allow it, though not sure how, an ME to ME3 save. I seriously doubt they will allow an ME save to be imported into ME3 though.

When you import a ME save into ME2 it carries over details from that, the save you then take from ME2 to ME3 will carry on those details

[catgirl789]

I think that it would be nice to have a "Shepard sacrifices her/himself to save the galaxy" ending instead of a "Shepard dooms the universe and goes down with it because of her/his stupidity" ending. However, I don't want a Dragon Age scenario either where the only way to save the galaxy is to sacrifice someone or unleash a potentially evil god baby upon the world. Maybe the only way to not have to sacrifice someone would be to have made the right decisions in the first two games? Or that should at least make it easier.

[R3MUS]

I get a feeling that this will be like the Matrix.

The Reapers are too powerful for a full-scale assault directly onto them. So Shepard will go behind enemy lines, into darkspace, a one way trip, and there find something we didn't know....

And while Shepard is out in darkspace, the universe have to defend themselves against all the Reapers (500.000? 1.000.000?) and it's looking pretty grim and suddenly, all the Reapers "shut down" and dies or becomes "dead", they cannot move or do anything.

And Shepard dies out in darkspace.

I am thinking the Reapers are kinda locusts in our world, they move from place to place (or locations) in HUGE numbers and devour everything in their path.

[azerSheppard]

As long as he doenst die in the beginnig of the game, i'll be game. Remember GOW sequels? The stupid gimmick of taking all the powers away in order to make a clean start, i hope that doesnt happen in ME3.

[robarcool]

Shepard's death could be an option, but it is not necessary that Shepard has to die at the end. It could be something like his fate is unknown. I mean consider the examples of allstar Superman and Halo series. In the former's ending, Superman is shown in the sun forging something out and in the latter's ending, Master Chief is drifting in a pod towards an unknown planet. So, their deaths are not explicitly represented, though these aren't happy endings exactly. Why is it that he has to die to make the fans feel good?
BTW, I would like an alternative ending where the reapers are not destroyed but brought to their senses that they aren't supreme and they have to coexist with organic life or they will the ones getting the boot. Arrogant machines!

[robarcool]

And yeah, to all those saying that achieving death or life of Shepard should be more difficult in ME3 than it was in ME2 (for Shepard is going against the reapers this time), it is a video game! You shoot things right and make the correct dialogue choices and you win! That's the beauty of it! Instant gratification!

Modifié par robarcool, 10 avril 2011 - 11:54 .

[JusticarDoom]

Well Bioware have made it difficult for themselves here.bbecause unless its very emotional and satisfying, UNLIKE the end of me2 if he dies, it will just be an annoyance. why? Because he's died already (twice potentially) and I think death loses it's edge after the first one or two times ^^.

But yes, I believe one of the many endings will have shephard die in the galaxys defense.

[N7Infernox]

Robuthad wrote...

I would preferably live through the whole series. Im sure Bioware will put in an ending where Shep dies and whole thing is EPIC FAIL. But you can be 90% sure they wont force you to die.<br />
.

[video game freak]

Oh god this is so depressing reading this

[YuniSticksitDeep]

Before any of you buy Me3, you might want to Google ™ the following Phrase...

Worst ending in a Game

Just for fun nothing else..see what you get. I don't tweet or facebook but...its nice to know you can't hide bad work like the old days.

Yuni
"Be honest with each other"