Qunari, Chantry or Imperial Chantry?
#26
Posté 19 décembre 2010 - 05:50
#27
Posté 19 décembre 2010 - 06:14
The Chantry would be welcome to have chantrys and preach as would the Qunari but mage hawke wont let ideology into politics.
Think i'll put Bethany in charge as Grandmaster
This is assuming all goes well and an exalted march isn't declared.
Meanwhile Hawke shall become the new Visicount of kirkwall Then through conquest and negotiation become High King of a United free marches kingdom
Modifié par EnforcerGREG, 19 décembre 2010 - 06:44 .
#28
Posté 19 décembre 2010 - 06:25
#29
Guest_Puddi III_*
Posté 19 décembre 2010 - 06:40
Guest_Puddi III_*
#30
Posté 19 décembre 2010 - 06:48
I'd choose the Chantry; I suspect it is far easier to overthrow a group of religious drug addicts than horned giants with a military culture.
Should the need arise.
Modifié par Liana Nighthawk, 19 décembre 2010 - 06:48 .
#31
Posté 19 décembre 2010 - 07:53
#32
Posté 19 décembre 2010 - 08:13
#33
Guest_Hanz54321_*
Posté 19 décembre 2010 - 08:27
Guest_Hanz54321_*
I'd have to see how the Qunari culture is developed in the new game - there may be new things in the new game that we weren't priivy to in the old one. Or there may be a "Midiclorian Move" where the whole concept of The Qun is re-written.
I could write the same about The Chantry, but somehow I feel like The Chantry's stances and philosophies are pretty concrete in lore and I don't see the writers being comfortable changing that.
I won't answer the question but to say I'll decide when the decision is put before me and not until.
#34
Posté 19 décembre 2010 - 08:33
#35
Posté 19 décembre 2010 - 08:33
#36
Posté 19 décembre 2010 - 08:40
Modifié par Frolk, 19 décembre 2010 - 08:43 .
#37
Posté 19 décembre 2010 - 09:10
#38
Posté 19 décembre 2010 - 09:17
#39
Posté 19 décembre 2010 - 09:38
#40
Posté 20 décembre 2010 - 12:10
#41
Posté 20 décembre 2010 - 12:22
#42
Posté 20 décembre 2010 - 12:23
#43
Posté 20 décembre 2010 - 12:23
#44
Posté 20 décembre 2010 - 12:48
XxDeonxX wrote...
My Hawke would side with The Tevinter Imperium because he is a mage and well It would probably most benefit him as it offers more freedom for him
Yeah thats true but what about the whole slavery issue and it's connection with Kirkwall
#45
Posté 20 décembre 2010 - 12:49
#46
Posté 20 décembre 2010 - 12:53
#47
Posté 20 décembre 2010 - 12:58
Behindyounow wrote...
Depends. I'd leave the Imperial Chantry in charge, sure. But not the normal Chantry.
Madness.
#48
Posté 20 décembre 2010 - 01:07
#49
Posté 20 décembre 2010 - 01:22
Modifié par errant_knight, 20 décembre 2010 - 01:24 .
#50
Posté 20 décembre 2010 - 01:30
errant_knight wrote...
I wouldn't support the Imperial Chantry any more than the Qun. The Orlesian Chantry is the only one of the three that doesn't try to actually take control of the government. If the Chantry in Kirkwall is trying to do that, then they're moving beyond their purvue and need to be removed and replaced by Chantry officials who aren't.
Not directly but It's a major player in Thedas controlling the lyrium trade and the power of exalted marches.
I also get the feeling that the Chantry is biased towards Orlais. Has there ever been a divine that wasn't from Orlais. The ages also reflect this almost always having to do with the glory of Orlais.
The templars are in charge of Kirkwall in all but name they killed the last visicount to have him replaced with someone they could control.





Retour en haut







