37 réponses à ce sujet

[Quecken]

Go for a new graphics card. That's what I'm doing. I'm basically in the same situation as you, only though I have XP and a E6850 Intel Dual Core 2 at 3.01 GHz . 2GB RAM aswell.
 I also have a question though. Thinking of buying a rather cheap GFX-card to play DA with until I get my new PC this spring. Will this card suffice?

Gainward GTS250 1024 MB

896MB
GDDR3 @ 256-bit
PCI Express x16

or should I go for:

GeForce 9800GT
1GB
GDDR3 @ 256-bit
PCI Express x16

?

[daem3an]

To the OP, I don't know if this helps, but...



From Andreas Papathanasis:



"The key point to keep in mind from all of this is that if you have the recommended system configuration (even substituting the quad core CPU with a dual core at the same speed), you'll get 99% of what the game has to offer visually, and it will run very smoothly at all times on reasonable resolutions. Anything higher than that and all you'll get is better framerates if you're into that sort of thing (though it doesn't really make a substantial difference given this is not an action game), and/or the ability to run more smoothly at crazy high resolutions.



If you only meet the minimum requirements you'll have to turn down all graphics details sliders, but the game will still run smoothly - we focused a lot on making sure it is fully playable and that gameplay is not affected in any way by the lower detail graphics. If you're under the minimum requirements, the game may still run, but we can't guarantee what will happen since we haven't tested in configurations lower than that.



And if you're in between, there will be 4 graphics detail levels to choose from and some other performance video options, so you can pick your own tradeoffs between visual quality and performance."

[pharos_gryphon]

One question I had regarding the system specifications... what are people's experiences running games on 64bit Vista as compared to 32? Is there any noticeable difference?

[Silver Sparkle]

I am at minimum spec or maybe a teeny-weeny bit ahead:

turion 64 X2 2.2GHz
3GB DDR2 RAM
Radeon Mobility HD 3450 with 512MB Video RAM (minimum spec: X1550 256MB)
Vista Basic SP2 32bit(non aero graphics, frees up more VRAM)

Does this mean I am restricted to a low setting based game
can i hope for a medium-experience @ 1024x768

Modifié par Silver Sparkle, 27 octobre 2009 - 12:06 .

[Ingrimm22]

Silver Sparkle wrote...

I am at minimum spec or maybe a teeny-weeny bit ahead:

turion 64 X2 2.2GHz
3GB DDR2 RAM
Radeon Mobility HD 3450 with 512MB Video RAM (minimum spec: X1550 256MB)
Vista Basic SP2 32bit(non aero graphics, frees up more VRAM)

Does this mean I am restricted to a low setting based game
can i hope for a medium-experience @ 1024x768

This seems to be a notebook you plan on running this on, right? tbh, i'm not sure if Dragon Age would even start on this. Your GPU is really not up to it, i'm afraid.

[CommanderQuitter11]

Kinthalis ThornBlade wrote...

The video card is the main issue. I figure low-medium settings at 1680x1050. About the same as the console ins some places, worse than the console in other I'm sure.

An $90 upgrade (9800 GT at newegg.com) could have you running this game at Max at1680-x1050 or higher. If that's not an option then yes, I'd recommend the xbox 360. Maybe even pick up another copy for the PC as well so you can play with the toolset.

I agree, also if you really want the PC version id get a ram upgrade as well, make sure u have plenty of cooling space though.

[Komodo120]

Quecken wrote...

Go for a new graphics card. That's what I'm doing. I'm basically in the same situation as you, only though I have XP and a E6850 Intel Dual Core 2 at 3.01 GHz . 2GB RAM aswell.
 I also have a question though. Thinking of buying a rather cheap GFX-card to play DA with until I get my new PC this spring. Will this card suffice?

Gainward GTS250 1024 MB

896MB
GDDR3 @ 256-bit
PCI Express x16

or should I go for:

GeForce 9800GT
1GB
GDDR3 @ 256-bit
PCI Express x16

?

I would go with the 9800GT with the 1gig of Vram. It will last you for a long time. A long time

[shakix]

I have the same specs as the OP but with a GeForce 9800GT 1Gb and was wondering if I'd be able to run dragon age on medium setting with a good frame. Or should I just get it for PS3 as planned? I have a 22inc wide screen monitor if that makes a difference for the comp.

??

[Silver Sparkle]

Ingrimm22 wrote...

Silver Sparkle wrote...

I am at minimum spec or maybe a teeny-weeny bit ahead:

turion 64 X2 2.2GHz
3GB DDR2 RAM
Radeon Mobility HD 3450 with 512MB Video RAM (minimum spec: X1550 256MB)
Vista Basic SP2 32bit(non aero graphics, frees up more VRAM)

Does this mean I am restricted to a low setting based game
can i hope for a medium-experience @ 1024x768

This seems to be a notebook you plan on running this on, right? tbh, i'm not sure if Dragon Age would even start on this. Your GPU is really not up to it, i'm afraid.

my Gaming Index on Vista is a healthy 4.1 out of 5.0 ....

[MingWolf]

Silver Sparkle, I could be wrong but I think the gaming index is not out of five hehe. Anyway, the 3450 is definitely on the fluffy end of the low when comparing numbers to the minimum cards (at least when looking at some numbers on a chart). With that said, however, I have seen some low-end Radeons do some pretty impressive things on modest resolutions with some high-end games, and the 3450 is one of them. Type in your card on youtube and watch it play out on games like bioshock, crysis, etc. It turns out not too bad

[MrGOH]

Laptop cards (really integrated graphics) are not officially supported because they vary so much in performance based on the laptop manufacturer. That said, I bet it will be playable at low settings on the 3450, and it's likely you'll manage with some on medium.

[Numidicus]

The OP and others should also consider the gameplay differences between PC and console. Fewer but tougher enemies on console, more enemies on PC. Most importantly, PC allows the zoomed out view of the battlefield - makes the game more tactical, like Baldur's Gate. If that's the gameplay you want, go with PC anyway. Add a 9800GT if you can afford it.

[Silver Sparkle]

MingWolf wrote...

Silver Sparkle, I could be wrong but I think the gaming index is not out of five hehe. Anyway, the 3450 is definitely on the fluffy end of the low when comparing numbers to the minimum cards (at least when looking at some numbers on a chart). With that said, however, I have seen some low-end Radeons do some pretty impressive things on modest resolutions with some high-end games, and the 3450 is one of them. Type in your card on youtube and watch it play out on games like bioshock, crysis, etc. It turns out not too bad

my bad .... its not out of 5.0

But a base score of 4.1 is very good on vista. just checked the meaning of 4.1 and it says your gaming experience will be very good and you will be able to play all the latest titles.

Essentially gaming index between 4.0 to 5.0 guarantees good gaming experience. Vista also mentions that for Graphics performance their highest score has been 5.0

So as some of you have mentioned I think I'm all set for this game. Thanks folks.