266 réponses à ce sujet

[Zengaku]

well to me, it seems like that bioware held up on their part. the game looks amazing, a lot better than what those screens show. I am still getting the game day one. those screens lie. the only company i hate right now is bethesda because they continually screw over ps3 owners *cough*new vegas dlc*cough*

[REBEL21]

Haha Zengaku, do you think Jesse Houston will read this?? I heard the Bio devs go on the forums a lot

[10 Steps Back]

Zengaku wrote...

well to me, it seems like that bioware held up on their part. the game looks amazing, a lot better than what those screens show. I am still getting the game day one. those screens lie. the only company i hate right now is bethesda because they continually screw over ps3 owners *cough*new vegas dlc*cough*

I can forgive Bethesda, at least when they release buggy DLC on PS3 it's still buggy on the 360 version... Now Treyarch and Black Ops that's something that should be completely hated on my friends who game on PS3 constantly **** about the game and how the online is like crap. And I remember the reaction to the 1.04 patch...

Good times, good times...

[10 Steps Back]

REBEL21 wrote...

Haha Zengaku, do you think Jesse Houston will read this?? I heard the Bio devs go on the forums a lot

Jesse made a comment on the MAss Effect 2 Demo out on PS3 now thread in the Mass Effect announcement boards.

[REBEL21]

10 Steps Back wrote...

Zengaku wrote...

well to me, it seems like that bioware held up on their part. the game looks amazing, a lot better than what those screens show. I am still getting the game day one. those screens lie. the only company i hate right now is bethesda because they continually screw over ps3 owners *cough*new vegas dlc*cough*

I can forgive Bethesda, at least when they release buggy DLC on PS3 it's still buggy on the 360 version... Now Treyarch and Black Ops that's something that should be completely hated on my friends who game on PS3 constantly **** about the game and how the online is like crap. And I remember the reaction to the 1.04 patch...

Good times, good times...

And now Bioware is doing the same

[10 Steps Back]

REBEL21 wrote...

10 Steps Back wrote...

Zengaku wrote...

well to me, it seems like that bioware held up on their part. the game looks amazing, a lot better than what those screens show. I am still getting the game day one. those screens lie. the only company i hate right now is bethesda because they continually screw over ps3 owners *cough*new vegas dlc*cough*

I can forgive Bethesda, at least when they release buggy DLC on PS3 it's still buggy on the 360 version... Now Treyarch and Black Ops that's something that should be completely hated on my friends who game on PS3 constantly **** about the game and how the online is like crap. And I remember the reaction to the 1.04 patch...

Good times, good times...

And now Bioware is doing the same

Not to the extent that Activision and their cronies do it they aren't

[uzivatel]

Throw_this_away wrote...

Xbot: I hate you bioware!!! You betrayed us! I will never buy another bioware product again. Me2 on PS3 should look inferior like all the other multiplatform games! And what do wwe get for being loyal? NOTHING. You give PS3 fans the interactive comic!!!! We only have ME1... a full game.

Come on, dont be cruel. We had no way to know.
Well, we did know about the comics coming later, but we had no way to know the ME3 engine is goin to look like this. I mean, BioWare told us ... okay, we should have seen it coming.

[REBEL21]

10 Steps Back wrote...

REBEL21 wrote...

10 Steps Back wrote...

Zengaku wrote...

well to me, it seems like that bioware held up on their part. the game looks amazing, a lot better than what those screens show. I am still getting the game day one. those screens lie. the only company i hate right now is bethesda because they continually screw over ps3 owners *cough*new vegas dlc*cough*

I can forgive Bethesda, at least when they release buggy DLC on PS3 it's still buggy on the 360 version... Now Treyarch and Black Ops that's something that should be completely hated on my friends who game on PS3 constantly **** about the game and how the online is like crap. And I remember the reaction to the 1.04 patch...

Good times, good times...

And now Bioware is doing the same

Not to the extent that Activision and their cronies do it they aren't

I guess we have different views then. Bioware lied just like Activision and Treyarch. 

[Zatwu]

It looks like the PS3 version has smoother, less clunky textures but the PC/Xbox360 version has a superior lighting system.

[archurban]

but PC version is still better than xbox 360, PS3. why? you can set video max out which both console don't have. UI is much better. I don't like circle. it's not convenient. it actually cover the screen during playing. no matter what game is, PC version is still better than anything. it's simple. hardware spec is thousand times better than console.

[REBEL21]

uzivatel wrote...

Throw_this_away wrote...

Xbot: I hate you bioware!!! You betrayed us! I will never buy another bioware product again. Me2 on PS3 should look inferior like all the other multiplatform games! And what do wwe get for being loyal? NOTHING. You give PS3 fans the interactive comic!!!! We only have ME1... a full game.

Come on, dont be cruel. We had no way to know.
Well, we did know about the comics coming later, but we had no way to know the ME3 engine is goin to look like this. I mean, BioWare told us ... okay, we should have seen it coming.

Yea I'm on many other forums and people are saying the same things but just furious. I don't blame them at ALL. Bioware lied to us PS3 gamers

[shinobi602]

Zengaku wrote...

well to me, it seems like that bioware held up on their part. the game looks amazing, a lot better than what those screens show. I am still getting the game day one. those screens lie. the only company i hate right now is bethesda because they continually screw over ps3 owners *cough*new vegas dlc*cough*

Lol, no they don't. Those screens are what the demo is like. I experience a lot of screen tearing in the demo, and the FMV sequences are alot more choppy than the 360 version, not to mention for some reason they're really poor quality compared to the 360 version.

There's also noticeable framerate dips in the demo, and the lighting is...weird, to say the least. Not a lie at all.

[10 Steps Back]

REBEL21 wrote...

10 Steps Back wrote...

REBEL21 wrote...

10 Steps Back wrote...

Zengaku wrote...

well to me, it seems like that bioware held up on their part. the game looks amazing, a lot better than what those screens show. I am still getting the game day one. those screens lie. the only company i hate right now is bethesda because they continually screw over ps3 owners *cough*new vegas dlc*cough*

I can forgive Bethesda, at least when they release buggy DLC on PS3 it's still buggy on the 360 version... Now Treyarch and Black Ops that's something that should be completely hated on my friends who game on PS3 constantly **** about the game and how the online is like crap. And I remember the reaction to the 1.04 patch...

Good times, good times...

And now Bioware is doing the same

Not to the extent that Activision and their cronies do it they aren't

I guess we have different views then. Bioware lied just like Activision and Treyarch. 

You're confusing lieing with selling a broken product. Will ME2 be what Bioware promised it would be for the PS3? No. Will it be presentable and playable? Based on the demo I still got to play it.

Treyarch sold a graphically inferior and technically inferior game that far beats what the negatives I've experienced in the demo.

[REBEL21]

archurban wrote...

but PC version is still better than xbox 360, PS3. why? you can set video max out which both console don't have. UI is much better. I don't like circle. it's not convenient. it actually cover the screen during playing. no matter what game is, PC version is still better than anything. it's simple. hardware spec is thousand times better than console.

Obviously but this is PS3 vs 360 and suprisingly, 360 is sh*tting on the PS3 even though PS3 me2 has the ME3 engine

[iggy4566]

archurban wrote...

but PC version is still better than xbox 360, PS3. why? you can set video max out which both console don't have. UI is much better. I don't like circle. it's not convenient. it actually cover the screen during playing. no matter what game is, PC version is still better than anything. it's simple. hardware spec is thousand times better than console.

What does this have to do with any thing other than rave about PC hardware?

[REBEL21]

shinobi602 wrote...

Zengaku wrote...

well to me, it seems like that bioware held up on their part. the game looks amazing, a lot better than what those screens show. I am still getting the game day one. those screens lie. the only company i hate right now is bethesda because they continually screw over ps3 owners *cough*new vegas dlc*cough*

Lol, no they don't. Those screens are what the demo is like. I experience a lot of screen tearing in the demo, and the FMV sequences are alot more choppy than the 360 version, not to mention for some reason they're really poor quality compared to the 360 version.

There's also noticeable framerate dips in the demo, and the lighting is...weird, to say the least. Not a lie at all.

Exactly. I guess Bioware did a sh*tty job with the PS3 version

[Skilled Seeker]

Zatwu wrote...

It looks like the PS3 version has smoother, less clunky textures but the PC/Xbox360 version has a superior lighting system.

Lol other people are saying the exact opposite. This proves that graphic quality is totally subjective. So please shut up REBEL, you're getting on my nerves.

Modifié par Skilled Seeker, 23 décembre 2010 - 12:08 .

[iggy4566]

Skilled Seeker wrote...

Zatwu wrote...

It looks like the PS3 version has smoother, less clunky textures but the PC/Xbox360 version has a superior lighting system.

Lol other people are saying the exact opposite. This proves that graphic quality is totally subjective. So please shut up REBEL, you're getting on my nerves.

This getting really bloody dumb.<_<

[REBEL21]

Skilled Seeker wrote...

Zatwu wrote...

It looks like the PS3 version has smoother, less clunky textures but the PC/Xbox360 version has a superior lighting system.

Lol other people are saying the exact opposite. This proves that graphic quality is totally subjective. So please shut up REBEL, you're getting on my nerves.

Why am I getting on your nerves? I mean I'm trying to prove a point here! Bioware developers are BSers

[Zengaku]

shinobi602 wrote...

Zengaku wrote...

well to me, it seems like that bioware held up on their part. the game looks amazing, a lot better than what those screens show. I am still getting the game day one. those screens lie. the only company i hate right now is bethesda because they continually screw over ps3 owners *cough*new vegas dlc*cough*

Lol, no they don't. Those screens are what the demo is like. I experience a lot of screen tearing in the demo, and the FMV sequences are alot more choppy than the 360 version, not to mention for some reason they're really poor quality compared to the 360 version.

There's also noticeable framerate dips in the demo, and the lighting is...weird, to say the least. Not a lie at all.

 
have you seen the comparison videos on ign? if i had made the judgement as everone else has based on the screens than i would believe the PS3 version is superior. than you would say that they played the 360 on a worse tv than the ps3. 

[Nashiktal]

Screen shots dont do the demo justice. Is it an amazing leap forward? No. But those comparison images dont show the game in motion. The only thing I would complain about is that the shading seems a bit off.

[shinobi602]

Zengaku wrote...
 
have you seen the comparison videos on ign? if i had made the judgement as everone else has based on the screens than i would believe the PS3 version is superior. than you would say that they played the 360 on a worse tv than the ps3. 

Yes, and the comparison video on Digital Foundry, and comparisons on Lens of Truth and Gameblurb show the opposite to IGN. I'll believe Digital Foundry ANYDAY over IGN.

The 360 version in the IGN video looks atrocious, super low res video capture they're using, and Jacob looked like playdough. Definitely looks much better on my TV.

[Sparda Stonerule]

*sighs and leans back* Now my fears of having rabid PS3 fans on the forums has come to life. I just hope a month after the game is out that most of the borderline PS3 trolls will be out of here. It was bad enough with the "disappointed" people. Like Terror_K and Smudboy and Iakus and so on and so forth. Now we have people like Rebel force starting a console war.

Oh let's not forget starting up a whole new firestorm about how games developers are evil and are out to eat your souls. Or maybe that was money. It's hard to tell through the vitriol. Christ the forums are going to be extremely ugly for a little while.

[REBEL21]

Either way Bioware pulled things out of their *ss. Lying to the PS3 owners

[Zengaku]

shinobi602 wrote...

Zengaku wrote...
 
have you seen the comparison videos on ign? if i had made the judgement as everone else has based on the screens than i would believe the PS3 version is superior. than you would say that they played the 360 on a worse tv than the ps3. 

Yes, and the comparison video on Digital Foundry, and comparisons on Lens of Truth and Gameblurb show the opposite to IGN. I'll believe Digital Foundry ANYDAY over IGN.

The 360 version in the IGN video looks atrocious, super low res video capture they're using, and Jacob looked like playdough. Definitely looks much better on my TV.

i looked through the digital foundry and see they're comparison is much better.

the same can be said for me and the ps3 version