245 réponses à ce sujet

[Vigil11]

No!!! I'm not a fond of FPS (one of the main reasons I can't stand Fallout), TPS are much better.

[BiancoAngelo7]

No no no, especially because they have already departed from everything that made ME an experience instead of just a game, if they made it an FPS then I'm just gonna go straight to youtube to see the ending to ME3 cuz I won't give a crap anymore.

[The Spamming Troll]

im not a big fan of first person shooting. i feel like a floating pair of hands. its kindof stupid to me. i like third person because i can see my character. especially in mass effect since ive created his face and customize his armor, i WANT to see my character. i like the option fallout gives you of being first or third person, which i really think most games should have that option anyways. i also liked how my controller had a little more freedom in button mapping in that game too! anyways i dont think first person would work with ME. i probably would play it, but id never think itd be better then the third person games, so i wouldnt care for them.

[Lumikki]

kaff33nd wrote...

So Modern Warfare isn't cinematic? Hmmm...

Maybe I did not make my self clear. Cinematic movies are all about changing camera perspectives in situations. Meaning looking same situation from different camera angle, not just zooming in. It's like changing focus where the action is or the important moments to create visual impression. Sometimes impression is created by changing camera angle to something totally different.

First person perspective is only persons eye perspective, there is no other perspective. Meaning you look direction of watcher and you can zoom, but you can't change the perpective. If You would change the camera view perspective in first person shooter, it whould not be anymore pure first person shooter.

In TPS you can change camera angles and still have the TPS. That's why TPS is alot better creating cinematic impressions. Because you can change camera angles without breaking the TPS status. You can't do that in FPS, because it's would feel like droping in scene, while TPS can do it alot smoother.

Modifié par Lumikki, 26 décembre 2010 - 04:26 .

[SithLordExarKun]

PoliteAssasin wrote...

Will you shooter fanboys never be satisfied? Is the current combat not enough? Has Bioware not dumbed down the game enough for you? Seriously? This is ridiculous. Go ruin another franchise.

-Polite

Typical RPG snob.

[Reaver102]

Lumikki wrote...

kaff33nd wrote...

So Modern Warfare isn't cinematic? Hmmm...

Maybe I did not make my self clear. Cinematic movies are all about changing camera perspectives in situations. Meaning looking same situation from different camera angle, not just zooming in. It's like changing focus where the action is or the important moments to create visual impression. Sometimes impression is created by changing camera angle to something totally different.

First person perspective is only persons eye perspective, there is no other perspective. Meaning you look direction of watcher and you can zoom, but you can't change the perpective. If You would change the camera view perspective in first person shooter, it whould not be anymore pure first person shooter.

In TPS you can change camera angles and still have the TPS. That's why TPS is alot better creating cinematic impressions. Because you can change camera angles without breaking the TPS status. You can't do that in FPS, because it's would feel like droping in scene, while TPS can do it alot smoother.

Beat me to it, Mass Effect is built upon third person. Removing it with the option to be in First Person would ruin or at least seriously burden the immersion of the game.  Mass Effect reminds many of a movie for a reason.

[hawat333]

To answer all the questions at once:

No.

[k-baggs]

(popping in)



I'd only put on first-person during romance scenes so I could see my LI's o-face.



(ducking out)

[IndigoWolfe]

I think that during gameplay, Mass Effect should remain solidly from a third person perspective. In third person games with an optional first person mode, the first person mode is rarely desirable or even as useful as the third person perspective, in my experience.

However, what I wouldn't mind is a few shots now and again in the cinematics where it switches to Shepard's first person perspective. Speaking personally, that would really add to the immersion and put me in Shepard's shoes.

Modifié par IndigoWolfe, 26 décembre 2010 - 07:16 .

[hamtyl07]

first person only works in certain games and ME is not one of them

[JamieCOTC]

Would it work? It might work, I don't know. It works fine in F3.

Would I like it? No. I like ME the way it is. I wouldn't like it even if it were an option.

[Dr. Heart]

SithLordExarKun wrote...

PoliteAssasin wrote...

Will you shooter fanboys never be satisfied? Is the current combat not enough? Has Bioware not dumbed down the game enough for you? Seriously? This is ridiculous. Go ruin another franchise.

-Polite

Typical RPG snob.

He's right though. 

[PHub88]

No FP

[Pacifien]

Dr. Heart wrote...

SithLordExarKun wrote...

PoliteAssasin wrote...
Will you shooter fanboys never be satisfied? Is the current combat not enough? Has Bioware not dumbed down the game enough for you? Seriously? This is ridiculous. Go ruin another franchise.
-Polite

Typical RPG snob.

He's right though. 

He wasn't, though. Keep insults out of the discussion.

[PHub88]

Its hilarious this was even discussed...These crybab COD fans cried and cried until %90 of ME2s changes was making it into a shooter...and now they want ME3 to be in FP...jesus christ and people say people like me are out of line to call the ridiculousness of people like this who want every single mother freaking game to be the same exact thing as any other game...just and shoot DURRR ME HEADHSOT SDIURRRRR ME SHOOT SHOOT DURRRR HEADZONT SSNENWSS SHOT SHOT DUURRRRR GET DA TANK N SHOOT DURRR

[hamtyl07]

there is no need for first person in this game series first person is only uselful in COD battlefield and any of those types of games but not at all in the ME series

[Pyrate_d]

I hope they make it first person, just to show up all the people saying I'LL NEVER BUY BIOWARE AGAIN ARRRRGHHHHHHH

[KainrycKarr]

Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.

[rokeeb]

 I only skimmed through pages 7-9 so sorry if anything like this has been said.

I wouldn't mind some first person perspective parts in the game. How about adding an optional zoom while using assault rifles, (using a scope similar to the sniper rifles) seeing as the assault rifles have scopes on them. I think it could really enhance the gameplay by adding some precision when using a weapon other than the sniper rifle.

I also wouldn't mind what bogsnot1 said, as long as it was integrated properly.

@ all the people saying they don't want Mass Effect to be a shooter: Wasn't it meant to be a third person shooter/ Role Playing Game hybrid in the first place? As in, wasn't that the intention of Bioware while making Mass Effect 1?

All in all, I really don't see the problem with adding a feature to the game, especially if it's optional.

[The_11thDoctor]

Googlesaurus wrote...

Like F3? I so want this, but the entire cover system would have to be removed to make it work.

no it wouldnt. You'd just go back into 3rd while covering. Simple and games do it already.......

But no. I HATE FPS. Im more of a TPS kind of guy if at all. I wouldnt play ME3 if they suddenly switched to FPS camera instead. I'd pull my preoder off so fast you'd need Stasis from Dead Space to watch it happen!

If ME3 has multiplayer like they announced a ME game having, then it has to be in TP view or it will never be played by me. I'll just play Uncharted 3 for it, ir UC2. Only game I resently liked in FP view was Mirrors Edge. That's it. Havent like anything in that view since Perfect Dark 1 on N64.

[lukhas]

 Simply.It could be optional like Fallout 3.
If you like TPS play TPS and if you like FPS play FPS.
The target is find a point of encounter and not be so intolerant.
<_< 

[DaewaNya]

Just saying about the cover system: killzone 2 and 3 has a cover system.