@ Conestoga Joe, I'm confused about your tone and intent from your other posts. And you have been attacking the OP.
Instead you could have easily wrote: I don't believe Hathur, I want proof that his Grandpa exists and that his "Grandpa" is not being used in an argumentum ad verecundiam.
And you seem to be arguing from reductio ad ridiculum, here are select examples:
Conestoga Joe wrote...
as cool as it would be if this story was true, it clearly isn't. Some fanboy is just trying to justify his opinions of the game by going "My grandfather says paragon is better than renegade and he was in World War II so he's right!"
Do you all honestly believe an 80-year-old man is watching recorded RPG conversations and not only enjoying it but understanding it thoroughly enough to discuss the same points 20-something video game nerds argue about on the Internet?
These aren't movies, people, no matter how cinematically they're presented. If you have no experience with video games, you're going to have very little interest in these characters, especially if your only connection to them is recorded gameplay footage of a third party exploring their dialogue trees. Do you really think someone in his eighties would be so intellectually engaged by watching cartoons with a handful of preset body motions and facial expressions talk at each other for hours?
Do any of you have any experience interacting with people from this age group?
That's not how old people talk. That's how young people imagine they talk.
Like I said, it'd be a cool story if it was true, but you people are acting as if this something so profound and awesome when it's just some guy taking you for a ride.
the OP is a faceless nobody. In my experience, when a stranger on the Internet tells you something that common sense says probably didn't really happen, most people don't decide to believe it anyway just because it would be cool if it was true. It's cool if you can read his posts and then honestly say to yourself, "Yeah, this probably did really happen," but it seems like most of the people in this thread are just posting kneejerk responses without any critical thought and could use a little perspective.
I raised a number of reasoned points why I believe the OP's story to be untrue. Do you dispute them? If not, you're just arguing for the sake of arguing, or because you don't want to accept that the story probably isn't true. Either way, what you've been saying has no bearing on any of the points I brought up.
I ask for a little perspective, please.
Thanks in advance.
Modifié par Praetor Shepard, 27 décembre 2010 - 06:56 .