http://www.onelastco...lready-on-disc/ A debug screen from a prerelease version of ME2. HEY LOOK IT'S KASUMI! Yeah, Shepard isn't part of the dirty dozen.CROAT_56 wrote...
Fredvdp wrote...
Kasumi came later. And Shepard is definitely part of the dirty dozen because he's the leader.Gibb_Shepard wrote...
Fredvdp wrote...
Exact quotes from the old forums before ME2 was released:Chris Priestly wrote...
Nope. Keep guessing.KainrycKarr wrote...
The Dirty Dozen:
Shepard
Tali
Garrus
Mordin
Thane
Miranda
Jacob
Grunt
Subject Zero
Legion
Zaeed
Samara
meforums.bioware.com/viewtopic.html
Well, he was telling the truth. Shepard is not part of the dirty dozen, Kasumi is.
Kasumi was supposed to be on disk i believe with zaeed coming later
The ME3 trailer was for Earthborn Shepard ("source" inside)
#101
Posté 26 décembre 2010 - 10:03
#102
Posté 26 décembre 2010 - 10:04
#103
Posté 26 décembre 2010 - 10:22
-Polite
#104
Posté 26 décembre 2010 - 10:27
Chris Priestly wrote...
Interesting guess. Not correct, but still quite interesting.
Where is your evil face which you always place under your messages?
#105
Posté 26 décembre 2010 - 10:58
#106
Posté 27 décembre 2010 - 01:55
Modifié par Destroy Raiden , 27 décembre 2010 - 01:58 .
#107
Posté 27 décembre 2010 - 02:01
PnXMarcin1PL wrote...
Chris Priestly wrote...
Interesting guess. Not correct, but still quite interesting.
Where is your evil face which you always place under your messages?
It must have a secret subtle game-spoling message behind it!
I kid
#108
Posté 27 décembre 2010 - 02:03
shinobi602 wrote...
Chris Priestly wrote...
Interesting guess. Not correct, but still quite interesting.
Hi Chris. Normally I'd believe you, but you've said no to things before that turned out right, soo, well I'll just take a wait and see approach,
^this
He can't be trusted
#109
Posté 27 décembre 2010 - 02:08
#110
Posté 27 décembre 2010 - 03:35
...so long as Bioware makes good on creating more of the branching DLCs that tells what happens during those 7 years
Modifié par Cossack72, 27 décembre 2010 - 03:37 .
#111
Posté 27 décembre 2010 - 05:10
Chris Priestly wrote...
Interesting guess. Not correct, but still quite interesting.
I'm sure if it was accurate you would say, "Hey--spot on!" It's not like you work for Bioware.
#112
Posté 27 décembre 2010 - 05:14
#113
Posté 27 décembre 2010 - 05:15
Cossack72 wrote...
For some reason I'm not opposed to the "7 years later" part...
...so long as Bioware makes good on creating more of the branching DLCs that tells what happens during those 7 years
Shepard was trapped in the spire for quite a while before he was able to rescue Garth.
#114
Guest_Bennyjammin79_*
Posté 27 décembre 2010 - 05:35
Guest_Bennyjammin79_*
#115
Posté 27 décembre 2010 - 06:49
TelexFerra wrote...
Cossack72 wrote...
For some reason I'm not opposed to the "7 years later" part...
...so long as Bioware makes good on creating more of the branching DLCs that tells what happens during those 7 years
Shepard was trapped in the spire for quite a while before he was able to rescue Garth.
That explains the shaved head.
#116
Posté 27 décembre 2010 - 07:09
shinobi602 wrote...
But it's been suggested that the main focus will be on stopping the
reaper threat on Earth, where the final showdown will happen.
nooooo, man it would suck that half of the game would be on earth, however the idea of having the different places where shepard is from affecting the repears attack would be quite clever. I wonder if this info appeared to be true how the conditions of survivor or war hero would affect the game perhaps those conditions make you play in a different way, if you are survivor maybe the circunstances at the end of ME3 would react according with this, if you are a war hero maybe you end up sacrificing yourself unless you had choose paragon ways and the other "allies" like the rachni come and save you.
#117
Posté 27 décembre 2010 - 07:34
PoliteAssasin wrote...
Wasn't this the same guy who said he had a source in Bioware who told him that the VGA trailer reveal was going to be for a ME2 DLC that grew into an expansion pack? Yeah... How did that turn out again??????
-Polite
The OP was the same guy? Wow. Well, if that's the case, then he is just trolling. Geez, good thing, too.
#118
Posté 27 décembre 2010 - 08:42
Chris Priestly wrote...
Interesting guess. Not correct, but still quite interesting.
I like how you euphmistically called him a liar. After all, he did not say he was "guessing," but that he got this information from a "inside source in Bioware." He's either telling the truth or lying, or his inside source is lying or unreliable.
#119
Posté 27 décembre 2010 - 08:06
No, he's calling him wrong. That means his "source"(My dad's brother's friend's son's former college roommate works at Bioware so I know these things) was lying. Stop being so damn touchy about something so insignificant.Weskerr wrote...
Chris Priestly wrote...
Interesting guess. Not correct, but still quite interesting.
I like how you euphmistically called him a liar. After all, he did not say he was "guessing," but that he got this information from a "inside source in Bioware." He's either telling the truth or lying, or his inside source is lying or unreliable.
#120
Posté 27 décembre 2010 - 08:12
The world may never know. Until later on anyways.
#121
Posté 27 décembre 2010 - 08:13
#122
Posté 27 décembre 2010 - 09:30
KingDan97 wrote...
No, he's calling him wrong. That means his "source"(My dad's brother's friend's son's former college roommate works at Bioware so I know these things) was lying. Stop being so damn touchy about something so insignificant.Weskerr wrote...
Chris Priestly wrote...
Interesting guess. Not correct, but still quite interesting.
I like how you euphmistically called him a liar. After all, he did not say he was "guessing," but that he got this information from a "inside source in Bioware." He's either telling the truth or lying, or his inside source is lying or unreliable.
An inside source is an inside source, despite whatever else you choose to call it. Saying that you have one means that you know this or that information is correct, not that you guess it is correct. So, Priestly calling it an "interesting guess" does not make sense, unless he meant it as a euphemism for "you are lying" or "your source is lying" or "your source is not as "inside" as you think."
I was just pointing this out, not being "touchy." And it is not insiginificant to me even if it is to you.
Modifié par Weskerr, 27 décembre 2010 - 09:31 .
#123
Posté 27 décembre 2010 - 09:31
#124
Posté 27 décembre 2010 - 09:33
#125
Posté 27 décembre 2010 - 10:04





Retour en haut






