Shinobu wrote...
Those in favor of Queen Anora as sole ruler, is she good for your people (Dalish, Dwarves, etc)? She's super bad news for the City Elves, although I seem to recall that if the Warden lives and doesn't ask for "My people to be treated fairly for once" no Alienage Bann is made (and later stoned to death) and the food riots don't happen. (ejoslin, is this correct?) So, for City Elves, it might be better to ask for "a title and lands" or "to serve the crown" when Anora is sole ruler, so the Warden can have some actual power to do good instead of relying on Anoia Queen Codfish Anora to do whatever she wants. (Who wants to be a Bann when you can be a Teyrn?) In that case you get the "Sadly, things won't change for our people" dialog option when you talk to Cyrion after the coronation, but the epilogue doesn't seem as dismal. (Again, I may be misremembering.)
When I played, I didn't see any sign that Anora would be bad news for the city elves. Maybe one could infer it from the somewhat "overly-pragmatic" way she behaves sometimes, but it didn't occur to me that she could really take things too far. As far as I could see in the Epilogue, even though she got down heavy on the riot, it didn't seem as if it went so far as to simply ruins City Elves lives. Of course, the epilogue is alot brighter on this subject if Alistair is made king, but it doesn't seem that Anora is
all bad. She just didn't handle it the best way there was. I might be missing some information, though.
Either way, as long as we're on this topic, there's something I've wondered about for awhile: when you make Anora's queen, the epilogue goes on about how a golden age has come to Ferelden and what not, with trade being stabilished far and wide with other countries, etc. When Alistair and Anora are married, though, the epilogue, even though it isn't bad, doesn't point out that there's been so much improvements either. Likewise, if only Alistair is made ruler, the elves get one of their own to be part of the court (or something like that - not remembering it exactly right now)... Yet if he's married to Anora, it seems no such thing occurs. So my question is: are there disadvantages, Ferelden's interests wise, to put them both together? Are there good things that will happen to Ferelden only if one or the other of them is made ruler, but not both together? Because it doesn't seem the advantages of having one or the other as a ruler just add up when they're put together - which raises the question whether it's better to have only one of them as a ruler, and which one. I got the impression that, at least in terms of the trade expansion and the kingdom's influence, the outcome is better with Anora alone than with her married to Alistair. Maybe when they're put together, both end somehow holding each other back, for good and for bad?
Modifié par NuclearSerendipity, 28 décembre 2010 - 03:47 .