Dragon Age = Porn Age?
#101
Posté 28 décembre 2010 - 06:30
#102
Guest_Corvus I_*
Posté 28 décembre 2010 - 06:32
Guest_Corvus I_*
I am inclined to agree with RagingCyclone . It is not worth the effort involved here to learn all this stuff while trying to satisfy everyone's definition of what is right, and how it all should be done.
#103
Posté 28 décembre 2010 - 06:38
#104
Posté 28 décembre 2010 - 06:41
Very simply put, you have posts with bugs? You fix them and go by that. If you have requests for more, that is your decision to put in the time and energy, since you are doing this because you enjoy it I would assume.
Do other mods do their work based on how many people hit popularity? Does that in any way degrade the mods quality if people do not hit the popularity cross? Why are you the only one doing this? Can you risk taking off the one sentence in your description of "next upgrade at 5000" and still enjoy your work and provide continuous updates? Or if people do not hit it then you shouldn't work on it at all? Because if that were the case with other modders, nothing would be updated.
I have worked way over 500 hours on the Wedding alone. Does this mean that I shouldn't continue to improve it if I don't get the thousands of hits on popularity?I will not stoop down to buying popularity because I respect myself and players, and their decision to hit it or not.
Modifié par DahliaLynn, 28 décembre 2010 - 06:47 .
#105
Posté 28 décembre 2010 - 06:44
RagingCyclone wrote...
Dahlia, that lack of a system to group mods was why I kept posting mine at the Nexus. Although the system there is also flawed, it was for a time very structured. It has gotten aaway from that, but what I liked about it there was the lack of "in progress" mods. There is one here on BSN in particular that I have watched with interest because it looks good. However, it has a decent popularity without a single file to download. That was not allowed at the Nexus for a long time. I would like to see a more structured method used here to present mods categorized or however, and even a removal of all the "requests" and "coming soon" mods that are listed, but just that, a listing with no actual mod in place to download.
If anything, There should be a wishlist cross...and a popularity one downloaded and endorsed cross
#106
Posté 28 décembre 2010 - 06:48
Sinmara wrote...
and one thing is interesting here:
we get this thread away from the - in my opinion bad start and things like "banning"- to a discussion about things to think about and worth to discuss. Especially in the last posts here.
I think the most bad thing is to have missunderstandings, hostility, competition based thinking ... like - sorry to the men who are better in their mind today, I know a lot, also in the projects - the patriarchalic way. we could do this better, I hope.
"keep talking sisters" is one of the best sentences here in the thread.
To be honest the only hostile posts I've seen here were from a member of your team openly insulting somebody.
Aside from that there was a lot of word twisting, and defensive attitude.
I don't think anybody here has anything personal about any of you or the mod itself, only personal preferences. And I don't want to repeat myself but bioware has to be consistant with decisions made in the past and improve their system.
Corvus I, I'm very glad to read what you say. Given the fact you don't mind either way, then I'd like you to listen to what Dahlia says. She's making a lot of sense.
Modifié par DLAN_Immortality, 28 décembre 2010 - 06:51 .
#107
Posté 28 décembre 2010 - 06:49
#108
Posté 28 décembre 2010 - 06:49
However, fishing for votes is acceptable, even if not chivalrous. At the end of the day we can't force anyone not to write something even if it is controvercial. People will realize eventually what's good and what's not.
Modifié par idomeneas, 28 décembre 2010 - 06:54 .
#109
Posté 28 décembre 2010 - 06:56
Kevin Lynch wrote...
This thread is going a little off the topic. Discussion of how other sites handle popularity for third-party mods is not discussion of the game and really belongs on those third-party sites. Bring it back around to discussing mods and DA:O itself. Thanks.
The thread as I see was created because the OP questioned the Mod at the top of the BSN Project list which was at highest popularity.
I was discussing the not so classy methods in which this "top" mod was attaining its popularity, therefore causing the impression that BSN users had found this mod to be the best or highest ranked out there, which happened to be a pornographic mod.
If you feel this is off topic I can refrain from continuing on the subject matter.
Modifié par DahliaLynn, 28 décembre 2010 - 06:56 .
#110
Posté 28 décembre 2010 - 06:57
And with that, I will gracefully bow out and exit stage left.
#111
Guest_Corvus I_*
Posté 28 décembre 2010 - 07:04
Guest_Corvus I_*
DLAN_Immortality wrote...
I'm not sure, Corvus I. I wonder why you would do such thing as saying "next update when we hit 5000 +" if you didn't think it would work or that it would work against you? :-)
The player evidently has something to gain if you withhold the updates until you get to a popularity mark.
Sorry I missed this one.
Because all of my mods are codex sensitive. I have been releasing around anything that could effect a game in play for several months. I could have as easily said I expect to make the last release of codex sensitive changes in July of 2011, but this has become a real sore point with me.
It is so easy for outsiders that have not kept up with the thread for the last several months to come into a mod and have mislead observations as to the how and why of things
#112
Posté 28 décembre 2010 - 07:09
To me this "sore point" is a sad and weak excuse behind a better reason for simply attaining popularity period.
Modifié par DahliaLynn, 28 décembre 2010 - 07:22 .
#113
Posté 28 décembre 2010 - 07:24
As I am understanding it, there is pretty broad support for the following.
1. The Bioware Social Network projects page desperately needs to be categorised to have adult and non-adult content.
2. The Popularity system on the Bioware Social Network project page needs to be overhauled so that it cannot be exploited to unfairly promote mods against others.
I think just these two things would make the projects page on this site fairer for modders and easier for casual players to navigate to the content which they want to download.
#114
Posté 28 décembre 2010 - 07:26
???Kevin Lynch wrote...
This thread is going a little off the topic. Discussion of how other sites handle popularity for third-party mods is not discussion of the game and really belongs on those third-party sites. Bring it back around to discussing mods and DA:O itself. Thanks.
So this means you haven't read anything aside from just one post that happended to mention nexus, right?
This thread is actually important and numbers a lot of issues of this site that should be fixed, especially in terms of popularity. In that sole post you read, it says that Nexus is the other modding site that has a ranking system, that by the way is working better. Please tell us how listing the pros and cons in nexus to better this site is off topic, especially if it's mentioned in one post (or two or three. Hardly anything in 5 legitimate pages).
Corvus I: LOL! Oh, yea, of course.
Well, I guess what had to be said was said already. Hopefully bioware will care a bit more.
Modifié par DLAN_Immortality, 28 décembre 2010 - 07:33 .
#115
Posté 28 décembre 2010 - 07:27
Of course there would be "adult" (sexually explicit) mods if it were at all possible. And of course those would become the most common (in all senses of the term) ones out there. This is the internet in the 21st Century. Rule-34 only gets more ingrained!
But the huge backlash toward the SD team over their use of endorsements seems out-of-line to me as well. As someone who plays DA regularly with over 3GB of mods installed, who was done a couple of trivial mods using the Toolset for my own use, written (and posted) a mini-tutorial on using DA mods, and who decided to see what one (of the many) SD mods was all about, I can say that:
a) I have NEVER noticed a mod's "popularity" or "endorsement" rating before deciding to download it. I do try to remember to "click the cross" (or "up-thumb") for those I've liked. But if it weren't for the "Nag" feature on Nexus, I probably wouldn't.
b. It doesn't bother me in the slightest for a modder to say, "More updates will be produced if you (the Community) indicate your desire for them in an active manner." Since expecting folk to write detailed (or even brief) remarks is asking too much, using the "One-click means - Yes, please" approach seems reasonable to me. Would I rely on, or even desire, that sort of feedback as an incentive to continue working on a mod of my own? Maybe (probably) not. Mais à chacun son goût...
c) I very occasionally use a site's "Most Popular" sorting tool to see what others have liked, but am seldom impressed by a "better" relative ranking.
d. I would WHOLEHEARTEDLY support some kind of "type" tag for projects on the BSN, the two most critical (in my opinion) being "NRFPT" (Not Ready For Prime Time: Beta, WIP), and "Adult". Beyond that, the system could support all kinds of categories that authors might want to assign. But if we just had those two, it would provide an easy way to filter out material for those who did not want to encounter one or the other (or both.)
e. Oh, and for those who care, I did not endorse the SD module I tried. In additon to finding the general tone too unrelenting in its focus and insufficiently romantic in its execution (which just means that it wasn't my cuppa') the incomplete VO work really put me off. But that doesn't mean I couldn't appreciate the enormous amount of work that went into it, or recognize that others might find it "exactly what they were looking for."
Modifié par Thandal NLyman, 28 décembre 2010 - 07:45 .
#116
Guest_Corvus I_*
Posté 28 décembre 2010 - 07:28
Guest_Corvus I_*
""To me this "sore point" is a sad and weak excuse behind a better reason for simply attaining popularity period.""
From who?
I can't get them from those that have already given them and those that have not don't care any way.
#117
Posté 28 décembre 2010 - 07:40
Corvus I wrote...
DahliaLynn,
""To me this "sore point" is a sad and weak excuse behind a better reason for simply attaining popularity period.""
From who?
I can't get them from those that have already given them and those that have not don't care any way.
Why your requirement for next update at 5000? Will you not update if you don't get your target popularity? Your mod doesnt deserve to be best it can be? Must you continue to request people hit your cross to determine the worthiness of the time you put into improving your mod?
I guarantee you if you dare take that requirement off, your popularity increase rate will drastically change. But your fans and download rates won't. If you had not done this from the start, I guarantee you, your popularity would not have been at this level. This isn't honest.
You probably aren't willing to take that chance in fear of people not hitting it because they feel they like it and do it out of choice and not direction. But that would make your mod popularity much more accurate in comparison to other mods who do not make such requirements, therefore putting things into better perspective for those looking to see popular mods, and obviously that's not in your best interests.
Modifié par DahliaLynn, 28 décembre 2010 - 07:42 .
#118
Posté 28 décembre 2010 - 07:41
- It's been argued for over a year now, about how the rating system on this site needs to be changed. I'm one of the most optimistic people you will ever meet, and I essentially have given up all hope.
- I have no problem with these mods being the site. If you object to them, don't play them. What is the saying? What's one man's trash is another's gold? *shrug*
- With regards to them being at the top of the list, for those saying they are only up there because of the "next upgrade at 5000", or whatever it is, I submit to you evidence A: A Dance with Roges, Part I. This is a module with extreme sexual themes, and guess how many votes it has? 736. That is unheard of on NWVault. What's even crazier is that it was released in 2006! Some of the most popular modules released in 2002 and 2003 (i.e. Adam Miller's stuff, Rick Burton's stuff, etc.) don't even have that many votes.
In short, sex sells. This mod would be at the top, regardless of if it had that line asking for more popularity.
#119
Posté 28 décembre 2010 - 07:46
I really hope somebody listens to you this time around! I've also voiced my concerns and nobody listened.
Modifié par DLAN_Immortality, 28 décembre 2010 - 07:47 .
#120
Posté 28 décembre 2010 - 07:48
DLAN_Immortality wrote...
Challseus, it's not that a certain mod is in the site or not. It's tge fact that an "adult" category is needed. I see that as an asset in nexus, and it should be here too. :-)
I really hope somebody listens to you this time around! I've also voiced my concerns and nobody listened.
Fair enough, with regards to the categories. To be fair to the Biowarians I have reached out to, I know they have good intentions. But, from what I understand, everyone was pulled in to work on DA2, leaving nothing for DA, or this site. Damn shame, really. I had such high hopes that this place could end up better than NWVault.
I'll still send that PM though
Modifié par Challseus, 28 décembre 2010 - 07:49 .
#121
Posté 28 décembre 2010 - 07:50
#122
Guest_Corvus I_*
Posté 28 décembre 2010 - 07:55
Guest_Corvus I_*
DahliaLynn,
""Why your requirement for next update at 5000?""
What requirement?
Posted at 9:00 PM on 2010-12-19
I had the most wonderful night last night, although I did not get a lot of sleep. My name sake niece slept with us. Little squirmy creature, she is just gorgeous, although at 5 she has already mastered the art of finagling. How can a 5 year old take up more room in a bed than two adults? I guess I have lots to learn.<BR><BR>OK, so far what I have for the 1.4g beta.<BR><BR>New multi scenes at multi location:<BR><BR>camp_aov (with app measures)<BR><BR>camp_bella (with app measures + waterfall if possible + more bella to see)<BR><BR>camp_fountain (with app measures)<BR><BR>camp_frostback (with app measures)<BR><BR>camp_haven (with app measures)<BR><BR>camp_ruck (with app measures)<BR><BR>camp_tombstone (with app measures)<BR><BR>camp_urn (with app measures)<BR><BR>bella tavern scenes increased (from the perth conversation) <BR><BR>Weisshaupt / Fade (multi origins encounters / an option for every origin pc + blood mages + Greagoir's Child)<BR><BR>shianni, the missing scenes (is she a love interest or not, I need feedback please. If she is then I may be able to create a back door into the Alinage for a visit or 2 when the pc gets to Denerim. You will take major hits from morrigan and or leliana.)<BR><BR>amethyne_iona (completed scene)<BR><BR>amethyne_epi<BR><BR>isabella (even if morrigan/leliana complains)<BR><BR>Greagoir's Child 0.1 (mini mod for team members only, right now)<BR><BR>in camp "Wynne / Spirits?" scene increases "Beta" I need feedback on these too.<BR><BR>All the voice that Matchy Pointy has been able to get.<BR><BR>I have set myself out a work plan and think I can get all of this released into 1.4g within a week of return. So keep the faith and keep the popularity climbing. I'll be home in about 2 weeks.<BR>
It is so easy for outsiders that have not kept up with the thread for the last several months to come into a mod and have mislead observations as to the how and why of things
#123
Posté 28 décembre 2010 - 08:01
Corvus I wrote...
Challseus, I agree.
DahliaLynn,
""Why your requirement for next update at 5000?""
What requirement?
Um, Am I nuts? "Next Upgrade at approx 5000"
If they don't hit popularity, people won't get an upgrade. Hm. Playing "I didn't do anything" really doesn't work.
Challseus says sex sells. I agree. Your mod could be quite popular. But unfairly, relative to other modders who do not write "next update 5000". (and rightfully so)
Modifié par DahliaLynn, 28 décembre 2010 - 08:02 .
#124
Posté 28 décembre 2010 - 08:02
WARNING NUDITY / WARNUNG NACKTHEIT - The German version is under construction. (Deutsche Beschreibung weiter unten, bitte)
Please remember to return and press the popularity cross.
"IMPORTANT" This mod is dialogue driven. If you are running any other dialogue driven mods you will lose a great deal of content . You may pick up a few lines of extra cute in other mods, but Sappho's Daughters is 100s of lines of editing, cut scenes and flag adjustments.
Next upgrade at approx 5000.
This mod is made for female human or elf pcs
#125
Guest_Chiara_Fee_*
Posté 28 décembre 2010 - 08:02
Guest_Chiara_Fee_*
Kevin Lynch wrote...
This thread is going a little off the topic. Discussion of how other sites handle popularity for third-party mods is not discussion of the game and really belongs on those third-party sites. Bring it back around to discussing mods and DA:O itself. Thanks.
first time ever I saw you THAT concerned
and all because of a thread kicked of by someone who has been for just ONE day in the community.. hard to believe this..
Modifié par Chiara_Fee, 28 décembre 2010 - 08:04 .




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut







