Aside from the fact, that one of the possible outcomes of those talks with him in ME1 was his firm decision to return to C-Sec, he could have returned there even if "renegaded". See, in the aftermath of the Battle of the Citadel, there was a shortage of C-Sec officers, so even Human crooks like Bailey could land the job of a Ward station Captain. Renegade Garrus could really enjoy reshaping C-Sec into a more efficient / less bureaucratic force.darth_lopez wrote...
Garrus continue working at C-Sec? Did you pay no attention to ME 1 garrus? He hated the place and approved of Renegade shepard actions. That would have Totally out of Character For him Completely even if it was a cameo the. The only cameo role for garrus that is in his character would've been to come across him during spectre training or in the field as a spectre Again that's what you can get from ME 1 garrus. The dude hates Red Tape and the bull**** tied up with C-Sec this is made blatantly obvious in ME 1 when he quits his job at C-sec Dear Lord sir! you should feel ashamed of your self for suggesting he return to a job he hates.Zulu_DFA wrote...
Phaedon wrote...
Zulu_DFA wrote...
Yeah sure, just look at the ME2 comebacks of Garrus and Tali:
Garrus:
I tried go for spectre again, didn't work out, so here I am.
=OR=
I tried go to back to C-Sec, didn't work out, so here I am.
Tali:
You gave me those Geth files, lol!
=OR=
[nothing]
That's great continuity, character development and what not.
What do you have to add? Garrus and Tali were important for ME2 and you know it, they had to return, they had to be in a position in order to join Shepard. Their variables passed from ME1 and ME2, expecting drastic changes would be naive. In ME3, all that has to happen is for dead squaddies to disappear, it's as easy as that.
They didn't have to return at all, not even as cameos. Neither did the VS. But they were all thrown in to please their fanboys.
That said, Garrus could have had an awesome cameo in place of Captain Bailey, and there could have been two completely different Garruses: one playing by-the-books paragon, and the other playing "badass" renegade. By ME3 he could've become the chief of C-Sec (oh yeah, Bailey's role again). Instead of all that, he contracted the "suicide mission" terminal disease.
So it would have made total sense for Tali to pursue a political carrer and remain on the Neema (which AFAIK is one of the three great live-ships) after the conclusion of her pilgimage. Well, perhaps doing important missions for the Migrant fleet is a good way of making a poloitical career too, but now, after she contracted the "suicide mission" terminal decease, there is 0% chance she can become a canon admiral. Sure, she can become one in your game, but in mine there'll be another admiral in that place, which makes it impossible for BioWare to build up much further on Tali's admiralty.darth_lopez wrote...
Tali's Role as daughter of an Admiral is unmistakeable, It's also something we find out about in ME 1, She is essentially a vital quarian political asset. If we're setting the stage for Geth/Quarian Peace or war in ME 2 it makes total sense and is almost a requirement shepard pick tali up again her influence over the quarian people is unmistakeably necessary. if she does not return in ME 3 it's likely she'll make a cameo as an Admiral on the Admiralty board and if she doesn't i'm willing to bet there's a 75% chance she ends becoming admiral Mid-ME 3.
Negative on Tali and Garrus necessity on the squad.darth_lopez wrote...
So yes for the story telling purposes in ME 2 Garrus and Tali were totally necessary if they wanted to remotely set stage forGeth/quarian Peace, The uneccessary characters in the Party to appease fans were Grunt and Legion.
While legion can also be integral in Geth/Quarian Peace he seems to have been an after thought with the only loyalty mission that has a 50-50 chance of not being possible to complete Grunts Sole Purpose was to join Clan Urdnot that is all.
Grunt was designed from the start to be a mini wrex, they even compare him to wrex in game. and Legion was there to satisfy everyone who wanted a geth onboard their normandy because their were plenty of posts in the old ME 1 forums about Give us a Geth. Which sounded like the most ridicuolous thing ever. While BW pulled it off well it was
certaintly the most obvious appeal to the fans ever, Along with Making Garrus and Tali remanceable but when those are like the only 2 romances that work well for most people i'm willing to bet that BW intended that the older party members have more romantic/cute scense and the romances were actually intended well before fans demanded it.
Afirmative on Grunt, he was totally redudnant, a bone thrown to Wrex' fanboys.
Negative on Legion. Like Mordin, he is tied into the story of the trilogy and has all the reason to be in the second chapter. That's why these two characters are the most popular of the ME2 squadmates with the general audience. Of course, BioWare did try to make them amuzing, so they could be loved even more.
As to the Legion being an "afterthought", are you nuts? Legion was in the teaser trailer for ME2! And Legion's loyalty mission is the most important of them all, as it makes the decision to send Legion to Cerberus or activate him at par with the Rachni queen choice in ME1.
But both Legion and Mordin have played their parts now, so any kind of their comeback in ME3 will be likely more fan service than not.
Modifié par Zulu_DFA, 31 décembre 2010 - 10:03 .





Retour en haut




