Aller au contenu

Photo

A common misconception about squadmates in ME3


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
927 réponses à ce sujet

#451
darth_lopez

darth_lopez
  • Members
  • 2 505 messages

Bamboozalist wrote...

Zulu_DFA wrote...
Edited quote, with in an edited quote, with in an edited quote.


How is the team Shepard's redshirts? That's like saying that Spock or Sulu is a redshirt. Crewman Mathews is a redshirt.

As for Garrus. Let's look at Garrus in the eyes of Turian culture.

Negative
1)C-Sec Dropout TWICE or C-Sec dropout and Spectre dropout.
2)Worked for a pro-human terrorist organization
3)Led a team that got slaughtered on Omega
4)His family thinks he's a slacker who quit both his jobs because he couldn't cut it and he's abandoned them

Possitive
1)He tagged along for Shepard to stop Saren (People remember Shepard for stoping Saren not his/her crew)

Yeah I can just see Turians lining up left and right to follow the guy. None of the ME2 squad has any real political power beyond Tali and even Tali has scenarios where she wouldn't have any (exiled or her father revealed as a war criminal). The only three good leaders are a wash out Turian and two terrorists.

Compare that to the ME1 squad (Not counting Garrus and Tali)

Wrex - Krogan Warlord
Liara - Daughter of a respected Matriarch
Kaiden/Ashely - Dedicated alliance soldier (not exactly the first person who would be going AWOL to join a terrorist organization)


I'd just like to point out that Garrus himself admits he's a bad turian XD.

Now i will also point out that Liara was cosidered a childish crack pot even though her mother was a semi respectable asari matriarch, who eventually turned against the council and supported saren, i dont' think she gets many props for that in the asari community.

And Wrex in ME 1 was a Krogan Warlord essentially in self exile from his home world. While he had potential Political power it couldn't be stated he had power in ME 1. In ME 1 wrex was more like the Pretty Bad Turian, except a krogan,  that Garrus is in ME 2 + an ME 2 Non-Exiled Tali.

and on the note of garrus again just about everything hedoes in ME 2 and Parts of ME 1 are out of line in accordance to turian culture. you forgot to point that out ^^.

Modifié par darth_lopez, 06 janvier 2011 - 06:37 .


#452
Bamboozalist

Bamboozalist
  • Members
  • 867 messages

darth_lopez wrote...

I'd just like to point out that Garrus himself admits he's a bad turian XD.

Now i will also point out that Liara was cosidered a childish crack pot even though her mother was a semi respectable asari matriarch, who eventually turned against the council and supported saren, i dont' think she gets many props for that in the asari community.

And Wrex in ME 1 was a Krogan Warlord essentially in self exile from his home world. While he had potential Political power it couldn't be stated he had power in ME 1. In ME 1 wrex was more like the Pretty Bad Turian, except a krogan,  that Garrus is in ME 2 + an ME 2 Non-Exiled Tali.

and on the note of garrus again just about everything hedoes in ME 2 and Parts of ME 1 are out of line in accordance to turian culture. you forgot to point that out ^^.


But here is the difference, Liara still has her mother's contacts and stuff to use or call in favors from her mothers old friends and Wrex is nowhere near the same boat as Garrus because all Wrex had to do was show back up and start killing crap to regain his possition. It's not like the Krogan place some stigma on leaving to go be a mercenary.

#453
Steve236

Steve236
  • Members
  • 377 messages
I want General Partinax as a squadmate. that dude sounds badass in the daily news.

#454
darth_lopez

darth_lopez
  • Members
  • 2 505 messages

Bamboozalist wrote...

Elite Midget wrote...

Yet you ignre the possibility that is the cheapests, quickest, and most they can do if they try and return the Zombies as Squaddies. Which I would like to add, for the record, can all die. You know, just incase you 'forgot'.

Also, the ME2 Squaddies are 'all' Red Shirts. They can all 'die' hence being 'Red Shirts'. You ever watch Star Trek?


Spock DIED.

Also the cheapest way would be to make it so you have no squadmates because really why does Shepard even need them? And no that's not the most they can do. Bioware gave us a fully flesh out squadmate for a character that you can sell and for a character you can keep locked in a tank.


in agreement with bamboozalist here i'd like to point out that your argument that it's "the cheapest way and most they could do to reintroduce squadies", midget, Is completely and totally reliant on BW being slackers who haven't been working on the game for a while. That and you assume that it is the most they can do which is simply not the case.

if your suggesting we consider the possibility of this occuring, which most of us have, i'd suggest you consider the very likely possibility that they are in fact capable of doing more as evidence i submit past bioware actions and superb character re-introduction for ME 2.

Considering how well ME 2 preps us for ME 3 i think it's a likely assumption, given they have 3 studios across to work with, that they have been workign ME 2 and ME 3 simultaneously. When looked at with reports(rumors) of an already playable game coming in from people inside EA(i refer to the NSF guy in another thread) it's a very likely outcome that they had been working simultaneously on ME 3 giving them the 5 years earlier refrenced to create a game capable of that many choices.

Keep in mind we've know this was going to be a trilogy since around ME 1 release. BW had stated it numerous times. They have had Plenty of time to work on everything after ME 1. In fact if they hadn't had an idea and general outline of how things were going to go in the trillogy at release, this would streamline story production and influence interconnectivity of the games in the trilogy by doing so it would also leave bioware more time to actual attend to programming and design matters, i would be very disappointed in them.



Which I would like to add, for the record, can all die. You know, just incase you 'forgot'.


this is negligible as you've obviously forgotten if your whole team dies shepard dies, shepard dies the save is not capable of being imported.

#455
darth_lopez

darth_lopez
  • Members
  • 2 505 messages

Bamboozalist wrote...


But here is the difference, Liara still has her mother's contacts and stuff to use or call in favors from her mothers old friends and Wrex is nowhere near the same boat as Garrus because all Wrex had to do was show back up and start killing crap to regain his possition. It's not like the Krogan place some stigma on leaving to go be a mercenary.


it's a very good point....krogan politics is pretty simplistic

#456
Elite Midget

Elite Midget
  • Members
  • 4 193 messages
Bioware isn't a bunch of 'slackers' as you would call them. So stop trying to twist the meaning of my words because you cannot form an intelligent point to debate against me.



FYI - Spock came back from the dead. He had a loophole that NONE of the ME2 Red Shirts have.



You're just pulling bunnies from your fake hat now. Mass Effect has been Squad Based combat since the first entry. Bioware wont remove it even if it's cheaper since doing so would endup costing 'far' more since they would have to revamp/rebalance everything. Thus Bioware wont do such a thing for te Mass Effect Trilogy. Why suggest such a thing other than to spew venom at those who disagree with your Fairy Tale Desires?



I considered the possiblity that they 'could' do more but that possibility is 'far' less lickely to occure compared to the alternatives for the many reasons I constantly pointd out in this thread. The task of doing what you demand is nigh-impossible to accomplish. Especially in the time frame that ME3 is plaed under.



How well 'does' ME2 prep us for other than dfeating the Collectors? Or have you forgotten that like ME1->ME2 the game known as ME3 takes place YEARS later. As we all know 'nothing' that was done in ME1 could have prepped Shepard for the events of ME2. I believe that ME3 will be just the case. Especially with the Reaper Fleet manageing to reach Earth.



Ideas change over the year. Look how many things they changed for ME1 in the time it was first revealed to its release. The two were 'not' the same game when all things are considered. Bioware isn't the type to lock is creativity over one ideal. Especially when a better ones come about with each passing day.

#457
Bamboozalist

Bamboozalist
  • Members
  • 867 messages

Elite Midget wrote...

Bioware isn't a bunch of 'slackers' as you would call them. So stop trying to twist the meaning of my words because you cannot form an intelligent point to debate against me.

FYI - Spock came back from the dead. He had a loophole that NONE of the ME2 Red Shirts have.

You're just pulling bunnies from your fake hat now. Mass Effect has been Squad Based combat since the first entry. Bioware wont remove it even if it's cheaper since doing so would endup costing 'far' more since they would have to revamp/rebalance everything. Thus Bioware wont do such a thing for te Mass Effect Trilogy. Why suggest such a thing other than to spew venom at those who disagree with your Fairy Tale Desires?

I considered the possiblity that they 'could' do more but that possibility is 'far' less lickely to occure compared to the alternatives for the many reasons I constantly pointd out in this thread. The task of doing what you demand is nigh-impossible to accomplish. Especially in the time frame that ME3 is plaed under.

How well 'does' ME2 prep us for other than dfeating the Collectors? Or have you forgotten that like ME1->ME2 the game known as ME3 takes place YEARS later. As we all know 'nothing' that was done in ME1 could have prepped Shepard for the events of ME2. I believe that ME3 will be just the case. Especially with the Reaper Fleet manageing to reach Earth.

Ideas change over the year. Look how many things they changed for ME1 in the time it was first revealed to its release. The two were 'not' the same game when all things are considered. Bioware isn't the type to lock is creativity over one ideal. Especially when a better ones come about with each passing day.


Shepard came back from the dead too, after planetary re-entry. Your point? Also go rewatch Star Trek, a redshirt isn't just someone who can die, it's unnamed crew member A-Z that we maybe learn their name for 3 seconds before they die. None of the ME squadmates qualify for that.

Also it doesn't take place YEARS later, we have no definitative time frame beyond a YEAR which is not YEARS.

#458
Phaedon

Phaedon
  • Members
  • 8 617 messages

Elite Midget wrote...

It 'has' been bought up before that the Squaddies wont returnto the Squad but could act as Ambassadors for Shepard. This was 'quickly' dismissed by those that will not take any solution that doesn't involve bringing back everyone as Squaddies and fully intergrateing them into the ME3 Story.

Who,why,where,by whom, with what-

Doing that means that the characters will end up less interactive them Zaeed and Kasumi were in Mass Effect 2. Is that your desire? To have all of the Zombies return and act like DLC Characters just so you have the 'novelty' of having the dead walking amoungst your crew?

You are making assumptions, Legion and Grunt were 'optional' but still had full dialogue.

As much as I liked Zaeed it doesn't take a Rocket Scientist to know that comparedto the ME2 Squaddies in ME2 he has 'far' less dialuge, interaction, and importance compared to any of them.

He's a DLC character.

#459
Bamboozalist

Bamboozalist
  • Members
  • 867 messages
^

A DLC Character that still has as much off of Normandy interaction as any other squad member.

#460
darth_lopez

darth_lopez
  • Members
  • 2 505 messages

Elite Midget wrote...

Bioware isn't a bunch of 'slackers' as you would call them. So stop trying to twist the meaning of my words because you cannot form an intelligent point to debate against me.

FYI - Spock came back from the dead. He had a loophole that NONE of the ME2 Red Shirts have.


sir i've tried to present you with reasonable and intelligent points in this debate the last one i presented may have been more interpretation of your poorly worded counterargument to bamboozalist. If this was the case i suggest you attempt to clarify your statements as it leaves little else to interpretation. Your argument is still reliant on that being the most they can do which simply isn't the case.

You're just pulling bunnies from your fake hat now. Mass Effect has been Squad Based combat since the first entry. Bioware wont remove it even if it's cheaper since doing so would endup costing 'far' more since they would have to revamp/rebalance everything. Thus Bioware wont do such a thing for te Mass Effect Trilogy. Why suggest such a thing other than to spew venom at those who disagree with your Fairy Tale Desires?


bamboozalist has a very valuable point. on the subject of ridding the game of the squad entirely because it is cheaper. It's an exageration of your POV that was made to point out a glaring flaw in your logic. It is realisticly the cheapest and easiest way to make the game his point was that even though it was cheaper and easier than any other option it was not one BW would consider for story, gameplay, and other aspects of practicality. if anyone here has been pulling bunnies out of a fake hat it's been you and zulu who over the course of these 18 pages have run out of ammo.

I considered the possiblity that they 'could' do more but that possibility is 'far' less lickely to occure compared to the alternatives for the many reasons I constantly pointd out in this thread. The task of doing what you demand is nigh-impossible to accomplish. Especially in the time frame that ME3 is plaed under.


you've considered no such thing. Nor have you presented any valid reasons that the return of characters is less likely. What you have presented is your opinion that the end of a trilogy should be a fully standalone experience, you've continued the dillusion of an immense mass of incalculable variables, and the second dillusion of ever mounting costs that exceed the games available resources, also the idea that the entire squad is comprised of Red Shirts. You've presented no solid evidence for the latter 2 and have been disproven on 3 of 4 acounts. The amount of capital available to BW to create ME 3 is still an unknown and it is likely for the moment we won't be able to completely disprove your theories on ever growing costs that exceed their resources. the only thing you've proven, with out a doubt, is that some people can not interpret facts when they are presented to them.

How well 'does' ME2 prep us for other than dfeating the Collectors? Or have you forgotten that like ME1->ME2 the game known as ME3 takes place YEARS later. As we all know 'nothing' that was done in ME1 could have prepped Shepard for the events of ME2. I believe that ME3 will be just the case. Especially with the Reaper Fleet manageing to reach Earth.


seriously does no one pay attention to overarching story in ME? ME 2 was about Prepping for the reaper invasion and hindering them by tacking out their last form of innergalaxy support the collectors. The collectors were a poorly presented antagonist that served the same role as saren did to sovereign they were the envoys of the reapers. Striking at the collectors in teh fashion shepard did was a direct afront to the reapers and is ultimately what causes them to invade in full force in ME 3. Furthermore Several Loyalty missions prep the player for an interesting diplomatic experience in ME 3. These 3 missions are obvious, if BW did not expand on them they would be wasted and missed story telling tools there would also be plenty of disgruntled fans because the missions lead into ME 3 is so obvious only a blind deaf man with no tongue or sense of touch could miss them. ME 2 serves as a direct prequel to ME 3 rather than a direct sequel to ME 1, it is more of an indirect sequel to the original though it preserves the overarching story it does a poor job of this. the main mission of ME 2 was taking out hte collectors the story was more about hindering the reapers as they indirectly attacked and harvested human colonies and attempting to learn about them this is why TIM presents the resolution at the end of the game to preserve the reaper tech and study it and hopefulyl use it against them or destroy the Base. To fool yourself into thinking there is no overarching story is tantamount to saying that the ME 1-3 is not the Shepard Arch Trilogy. ME 2 is now being given DLC designed to Bridge it to ME 3 in the same way the Force Unleashed(book) was designed to bridge the gap between Star Wars Prequels and the Original Trilogy. This almost irrefutably supports the idea that ME 2 is infact more of a prequel and lead in to ME 3 than it is a sequel to ME 1 and will have a much larger impact on ME 3 than ME 1 did on ME 2.

Ideas change over the year. Look how many things they changed for ME1 in the time it was first revealed to its release. The two were 'not' the same game when all things are considered. Bioware isn't the type to lock is creativity over one ideal. Especially when a better ones come about with each passing day.


There are many cases where that is correct, however for trilogies this tends to ammount to incredibly small changes. For example Darth Vaders original line being"Luke I Killed your father Coming" out as "Luke i Am your father" by mistake. while this example had a major impact it didn't change any of the real content in Star Wars. Luke still needed to confront Vader and Luke Still needed to keep the rebel alliance going along with rebuilding the jedi order. The i am your father moment here happens about mid way through the game on the collector ship.

now i'm going to associate star wars and mass effect to show a few trends in squad development. How is this relevant you may ask? Well considering that the Original Trilogy is widely considered the Birth place of the modern SpaceOpera ands set a standard formula for story flow in a cinamatic Trilogy it is likely that Bioware themselves are drawing from aspects of the story.

view shepard as Luke the Empire as the Reapers and the Squadies as Lea, Chewy, Lando, Han, obi and yoda.

What we see in A New Hope(IV) is the formation of the original squad Kenobi Lea chewy and Han, this is equivalent to ME 1's squad. In TESB(V) we see the addition Of Yoda and Lando as well as the capture of han solo, While Lea Lando and Chewy under the leadership of luke form the 'new squad', this when in relation to ME is the formation of ME 2s squad a combination of  New and Old members. in ROTJ the new squad plots to free  a portion of the old squad and re-unite with them (making solo equal to teh VS) they do so and re-unite under lukes leadership however yoda dies. After forming the Complete squad in ROTJ luke then takes the fight to the empire. The COmplete squad is the perfect fusion of New characters and old charactesr although we see some of the old characters did not continue on we are confident in the complete squad as they are given their seperate duties to finish of the empire. In ME 3 It is likely that shepards complete squad will consist of a few new and alot of old faces though not all old faces.

Now i'm sure you can all see the squad build trend here. and i'm sure given the time i could find a few striking areas in ME that highly resemble points in Star Wars(, for example the Destruction of the First Death Star Being the Equivelant of Killing Sovereign with a touching oh he got out at the last minute ending, the data vigil handing you being inexplicably similar to that contained by R2D2 on the death star, and the destruction of Eden Prime being equivalent to the Raid on lukes aunt and unlces home, really all seems quite obvious in hindsight)


And while i'm not saying that "this is it for sure. this is the key" i think if we looked at the star wars lay out we can plainly see similarities that are valuable comparissons to ME and in some cases may correspond to the ingame developments i just hope this hasn't been lost and people have actually read it.

Modifié par darth_lopez, 06 janvier 2011 - 09:09 .


#461
Phaedon

Phaedon
  • Members
  • 8 617 messages

Bamboozalist wrote...

^
A DLC Character that still has as much off of Normandy interaction as any other squad member.

That was a bit:



#462
Bamboozalist

Bamboozalist
  • Members
  • 867 messages

Phaedon wrote...

Bamboozalist wrote...

^
A DLC Character that still has as much off of Normandy interaction as any other squad member.

That was a bit:


Oh I know, I was simply adding to that.

#463
Catennwa87

Catennwa87
  • Members
  • 71 messages
Well I read your post. And I think the parallels are worth taking into consideration. I know its been said several times in this thread, but the second act of a trilogy is quite often just the prologue for the finale. Connections to the first act are there, but its much more about that build up. I think Mass Effect readily conforms to that, and there's nothing wrong with it.

The larger focus on squad recruitment and interaction in ME2 make me think that new squaddies will be few if not nonexistent in ME3. Too much has been invested in 15 characters to add another 8 or 10. (And in case you're wondering where I'm grabbing my numbers, ME1 = 5 [Virmire loss], ME2 = 10 [including DLC mans, not including overlaps])

At least, this is what I hope will happen. Either way we'll know pretty soon. This excites me.

Modifié par Catennwa87, 06 janvier 2011 - 10:08 .


#464
Phaedon

Phaedon
  • Members
  • 8 617 messages

Catennwa87 wrote...

Well I read your post. And I think the parallels are worth taking into consideration. I know its been said several times in this thread, but the second act of a trilogy is quite often just the prologue for the finale. Connections to the first act are there, but its much more about that build up. I think Mass Effect readily conforms to that, and there's nothing wrong with it.

The larger focus on squad recruitment and interaction in ME2 make me think that new squaddies will be few if not nonexistent in ME3. Too much has been invested in 15 characters to add another 8 or 10. (And in case you're wondering where I'm grabbing my numbers, ME1 = 5 [VS lost], ME2 = 10 [including DLC mans, not including overlaps])

At least, this is what I hope will happen. Either way we'll know pretty soon. This excites me.

By parallels, you mean the interaction between squaddies, right?
Well that happens after the loyalty missions anyways, and it's basically a gameplay mechanism. But if they are going to use loyalty true/false flags, as many others have suggested, then parallels will be mentioned. I don't see the point of a 'OMG you took her side 2 years ago!' scene.

#465
Catennwa87

Catennwa87
  • Members
  • 71 messages
Nah, I was more referring to the parallels in the Star Wars <-> ME comparison. I wouldn't be interested in minor things coming back to bite me either. More just hoping that their already broad array of characters isn't buried under a new squad in the final chapter. I like my bros. I'd like to roll with them with sideways visors and popped collars and Jager Bombs. No Reaper could withstand this.

#466
Zulu_DFA

Zulu_DFA
  • Members
  • 8 217 messages

Phaedon wrote...

Legion and Grunt were 'optional' but still had full dialogue.


Their "optionality" wasn't defined by some other game.

#467
Jaron Oberyn

Jaron Oberyn
  • Members
  • 6 754 messages

Zulu_DFA wrote...

Phaedon wrote...

Legion and Grunt were 'optional' but still had full dialogue.


Their "optionality" wasn't defined by some other game.


What's your problem man? You naturally this pessimistic? Or are you making an extra effort? :huh:

-Polite

#468
Phaedon

Phaedon
  • Members
  • 8 617 messages
@Catennwa87
Well sorry, I have been reading posts so quickly tonight that I misunderstand half of them.

Modifié par Phaedon, 06 janvier 2011 - 10:36 .


#469
darth_lopez

darth_lopez
  • Members
  • 2 505 messages

Phaedon wrote...

@Catennwa87
Well sorry, I have been reading posts so quickly tonight that I misunderstand half of them.


you should look over my last one, it has some pretty interesting stuff in there on ME star wars and it makes sense too :P

edit: by last post i mean insane wall of text

Modifié par darth_lopez, 07 janvier 2011 - 02:16 .


#470
JACKFTW

JACKFTW
  • Members
  • 9 messages
i hope my work for having everyone loyal, having every one survive, and getting jack as LI doesnt go to waist.
would make ME2 pointless if u got rid of them.
thoes who i deffinetly wish to be apart of my team
Jack is a no brainer used her on every mission possible and is LI. would be mad if not playable.
Zaeed another badass
Garrus my number 2 plz keep him.
Grunt hes pure badass
I don't expect to see everyone playable again however even if they survived. so basicly there dead or just talk to-able
non playables:
Samara
Zaeed
Kasumi
Samara
Morinth
Mordin
Thane
Grunt
Legion
ME1 returning playables plz note i have not played ME1
Ashley
Wrex
Liara
Joker
thats my list plz dont skrew me bioware :P

#471
Phaedon

Phaedon
  • Members
  • 8 617 messages

darth_lopez wrote...

Phaedon wrote...

@Catennwa87
Well sorry, I have been reading posts so quickly tonight that I misunderstand half of them.


you should look over my last one, it has some pretty interesting stuff in there on ME star wars and it makes sense too :P

edit: by last post i mean insane wall of text

I did, you make some good points.

#472
Sir Ulrich Von Lichenstien

Sir Ulrich Von Lichenstien
  • Members
  • 5 177 messages
With regards Lopez idea about SW/ME, i'm still of the belief that Aria = Lando.

Think about it, Pirate Queen in charge of a Mining City, we were introduced to her in ME2, sure she didn't join the group like Lando did at the end of ESB, but I think something might happen that'll allow it to happen in ME3. I suppose Anto could be Nien Numb :P (but am hoping any Batarian squadmate is optional).

Edit: Oh and I suppose that makes Wrex into Han Solo even if he is the complete opposite of him :P (just from a Han knows Lando, Aria is the Asari people assume Wrex talked of in ME). Oh and of course Wrex was 'frozen' out of the story kind of, with him being sidelined :D

Modifié par Sir Ulrich Von Lichenstien, 08 janvier 2011 - 01:28 .


#473
darth_lopez

darth_lopez
  • Members
  • 2 505 messages

Sir Ulrich Von Lichenstien wrote...

With regards Lopez idea about SW/ME, i'm still of the belief that Aria = Lando.
Think about it, Pirate Queen in charge of a Mining City, we were introduced to her in ME2, sure she didn't join the group like Lando did at the end of ESB, but I think something might happen that'll allow it to happen in ME3. I suppose Anto could be Nien Numb :P (but am hoping any Batarian squadmate is optional).

Edit: Oh and I suppose that makes Wrex into Han Solo even if he is the complete opposite of him :P (just from a Han knows Lando, Aria is the Asari people assume Wrex talked of in ME). Oh and of course Wrex was 'frozen' out of the story kind of, with him being sidelined :D


I'm hoping to avoid batarians >.< i hate them.  but yeah you could look at han and lando that way
but
i would say Solo more represents all non returning ME 1 characters who could have a possible comeback in ME 3, while Lando+Yoda represent new characters in ME 2 Lando Represents Returning Characters while Yoda those who die. The Ewoks could be used to represent new ME 3  nations, necessary to topple the Reapers the. Perhaps ME 3 characters can be better likened to the whole rebel strike team in ROTJ or Wedge antilles, people we've met before and play a pivotal role in the final segment but overall had much much less screen time than the others.

@pheadon ty ^^

#474
CroGamer002

CroGamer002
  • Members
  • 20 673 messages
How am I keep missing your awesome threads?

Modifié par Mesina2, 05 février 2011 - 05:52 .


#475
AdmiralCheez

AdmiralCheez
  • Members
  • 12 990 messages
Glorious thread necro is glorious.

But I think this topic is the biggest "well, durr!" thread ever.  IT is so obvious, in fact, that people need to read it again.

Modifié par AdmiralCheez, 05 février 2011 - 05:55 .