115 réponses à ce sujet

[Shadesofsiknas]

BringerOfChaos wrote...

All-in-all, the PC will always win graphically, even if they lose sometimes in other categories. 
Comparing PC graphics/gameplay to console graphics/gameplay is like comparing a trunk to a train. 

What categories does the PC lose in exactly?  Just curious.

And how does a trunk and a train compare? Trains will be quicker but trunks are streets ahead at stashing old gear in your attic.

[Teddie Sage]

REBEL21 wrote...

BringerOfChaos wrote...

essensx wrote...

BringerOfChaos wrote...

I've looked at both the 360 and ps3 version's on Mass effect 2.

The ps3 version looks and plays better than the 360. You guys should deal with it.

not true.

www.gameblurb.net/featured/versus-mass-effect-2-screenshot-comparison/

And? I'd rather trust my how eyes and my own sources.

That guy is obviously a mad xbaby who is pissed off that that the xbox lost one of the only reasons to buy it.

You just prooved my point. You are a blind poster

There are actually photoshopped pictures. The better quality is the PS3 version and not the Xbox360 version. IGN made a comparision and filmed it also. A bunch of gamer did the same on youtube too.

[Epic Legion]

Teddie Sage wrote...

REBEL21 wrote...

BringerOfChaos wrote...

essensx wrote...

BringerOfChaos wrote...

I've looked at both the 360 and ps3 version's on Mass effect 2.

The ps3 version looks and plays better than the 360. You guys should deal with it.

not true.

www.gameblurb.net/featured/versus-mass-effect-2-screenshot-comparison/

And? I'd rather trust my how eyes and my own sources.

That guy is obviously a mad xbaby who is pissed off that that the xbox lost one of the only reasons to buy it.

You just prooved my point. You are a blind poster

There are actually photoshopped pictures. The better quality is the PS3 version and not the Xbox360 version. IGN made a comparision and filmed it also. A bunch of gamer did the same on youtube too.

I like Sony fanboys attitude. If PS3 version looks worse, it's gotta be photoshopped!

[Shadesofsiknas]

BringerOfChaos wrote...

.They don't work for me. So I find them ****ty. 

Just as you find controller ****ty. I don't see why you are so mad. I've played on both a PC and console and I prefer the controller.

If the mouse wasn't bad enough the keyboard is a cluster**** of buttons. Controllers are more streamlined to me. 
Actually, aim-assist throw off my aim.

Well fair enough if you find K&M no good thats cool but you made a blanket statement that they are ****ty. I was just pointing out that you not liking them doesnt make them the ****tier control system. I think the gamepads are worse and showed a video showing why I think that. But its all down to preference neither of us can be right.

Oh and Im not mad over anything. What made you think this?

Modifié par Shadesofsiknas, 02 janvier 2011 - 01:12 .

[BringerOfChaos]

Shadesofsiknas wrote...

BringerOfChaos wrote...

All-in-all, the PC will always win graphically, even if they lose sometimes in other categories. 
Comparing PC graphics/gameplay to console graphics/gameplay is like comparing a trunk to a train. 

What categories does the PC lose in exactly?  Just curious.

And how does a trunk and a train compare? Trains will be quicker but trunks are streets ahead at stashing old gear in your attic.

A truck is powerful but in comparison to the ****ing terrifying power of the train it seems like a toy. That, and a train needs a lot more maintenance that a truck. Not anybody could fix problems with a train.

Other than the ones I already mentioned? If you want a high-end PC that can run the best games at max settings, you'll be out of a fortune. If you don't want that then your glorious master race machine isn't that much greater than a console. 
If you want a good PC you'll have to build it yourself which is a ****. It will probably fry itself if you do something wrong or it could simply catch on fire. 
It's not a user friendly platform and unless you know what your doing you'll be lost. 
It has no[color=rgb(128, 128, 128)">

[Teddie Sage]

Epic Legion wrote... Blablabla.

Excuse me but who's the fanboy here? You. I don't give a **** about which console is better. This is bull****. I play games I prefer but there is no denying that PS3 gets the better graphs on every games so far. I could play ME2 and ME3 on whichever console, I wouldn't give a damn because that's how I am. Since I own a PS3 and not a XBOX360, what do you think I'm going to play it on, genius? My PS3 of course because I'm not going to spend cash on a console that doesn't get much of my niche games. I'm a JRPG player and most of my favourite exclusives are on this console right now. That and the DS.

Modifié par Teddie Sage, 02 janvier 2011 - 01:16 .

[BringerOfChaos]

Shadesofsiknas wrote...

BringerOfChaos wrote...

.They don't work for me. So I find them ****ty. 

Just as you find controller ****ty. I don't see why you are so mad. I've played on both a PC and console and I prefer the controller.

If the mouse wasn't bad enough the keyboard is a cluster**** of buttons. Controllers are more streamlined to me. 
Actually, aim-assist throw off my aim.

Oh and Im not mad over anything. What made you think this?

Because it's impossible to accurately show emotion over the internet.

[shinobi602]

Teddie Sage wrote...
There are actually photoshopped pictures. The better quality is the PS3 version and not the Xbox360 version. IGN made a comparision and filmed it also. A bunch of gamer did the same on youtube too.

REALLY? Come on man.... lol

[Teddie Sage]

shinobi602 wrote...

Teddie Sage wrote...
There are actually photoshopped pictures. The better quality is the PS3 version and not the Xbox360 version. IGN made a comparision and filmed it also. A bunch of gamer did the same on youtube too.

REALLY? Come on man.... lol

From what I seen so far, PS3 owns on sharper graphs but XBOX360's version is more stable on the framerates.

[Epic Legion]

Teddie Sage wrote...

Epic Legion wrote... Blablabla.

Excuse me but who's the fanboy here? You. I don't give a **** about which console is better. This is bull****. I play games I prefer but there is no denying that PS3 gets the better graphs on every games so far.

Me fanboy? Lol fail. I got both consoles. Explain why Red Dead Redemption looks better on Xbox 360?

[BringerOfChaos]

Fanboys trying to reason with fanboys.



It's like this thread never happened.

[Teddie Sage]

Never got interested in that game (Red Dead Redemption). Why should I care? I don't defend consoles, I defend my games. *shrugs* This is going way out of thread, Epic Legion. Let's get back on the main subject, will ya?

Sorry for the big mess.

Modifié par Teddie Sage, 02 janvier 2011 - 01:23 .

[shinobi602]

Teddie Sage wrote...

From what I seen so far, PS3 owns on sharper graphs but XBOX360's version is more stable on the framerates.

Interesting that you choose to only focus on IGN's comparison, which makes the 360 version look utter crap. Seriously, the 360 version in that video looks extremely washed out and Jacob looked like playdough when you see him. Absolute bs.

All the other websites, including Digital Foundry which is the best for comparisons shows the 360 version having cleaner and sharper textures and more stable framerates, with little screen tearing. The case is opposite for PS3 version. It says the PS3 version is improved in some areas, but in others, it's noticeably worsened, to which they don't know why.

Modifié par shinobi602, 02 janvier 2011 - 01:27 .

[Teddie Sage]

Look, I'm not usually trusting IGN but it was one of the first sources to release a comparison picture I can think of. Then I didn't really bothered looking more than that. I have other priorities than following this game 24/7 so, it's true that I forget to look on other websites and etc.



"It says the PS3 version is improved in some areas, but in others, it's noticeably worsened, to which they don't know why."



That, I understood right away while playing the demo. It's far from being perfect and has some work to do on it before I can say it's good for me. Bioware may patch it later if it still has some issues on the ps3 port. I dunno, a game is a game. We shouldn't be dissing the engines capacities...

[GraciousCat]

Does anyone posting in this topic, besides the OP, even remember what this topic is about? You guys have completely derailed the topic by turning it into a massive console war.

[Darth_Ravor]

ITS A DEMO!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THERE WILL BE ISSUES WITH GRAPHICS AND FRAME RATE BECAUSE ITS NOT THE FULL GAME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! stop with the ducking console wars! who cares how a game looks or which console u have it on? its still the best game available period. i play games for story not graphics, and REBEL21 your just a troll with nothing better to do than argue with people on internet forums. mass effect is an excellent game and people are hating on it because bioware wants to expand the fan base and are all up in arms because u saw a portion of an unfinished game and it didn't look 100% perfect. get over yourselves.ps3 is a good console. 360 is a good console. i hate threads like these for the same reasons above. DEMO=UNFINISHED PORTION OF A GAME. and im going on because i cant think of a good way to end this post.............

[BringerOfChaos]

shinobi602 wrote...

Teddie Sage wrote...

From what I seen so far, PS3 owns on sharper graphs but XBOX360's version is more stable on the framerates.

Interesting that you choose to only focus on IGN's comparison, which makes the 360 version look utter crap. Seriously, the 360 version in that video looks extremely washed out and Jacob looked like playdough when you see him. Absolute bs.

All the other websites, including Digital Foundry which is the best for comparisons shows the 360 version having cleaner and sharper textures and more stable framerates, with little screen tearing. The case is opposite for PS3 version. It says the PS3 version is improved in some areas, but in others, it's noticeably worsened, to which they don't know why.

So it's wrong for him to choose the best source in favor of his argument, but it's completely ok for you to do it? Why do you think IGN's video looks so different? Why do all of these videos look different?

I'm sure they all can't be using the same TV. That might have something to do with it.

Modifié par BringerOfChaos, 02 janvier 2011 - 01:44 .

[thatbwoyblu]

PC elitists make me laugh.

[Teddie Sage]

BringerOfChaos wrote...

shinobi602 wrote...

Teddie Sage wrote...

From what I seen so far, PS3 owns on sharper graphs but XBOX360's version is more stable on the framerates.

Interesting that you choose to only focus on IGN's comparison, which makes the 360 version look utter crap. Seriously, the 360 version in that video looks extremely washed out and Jacob looked like playdough when you see him. Absolute bs.

All the other websites, including Digital Foundry which is the best for comparisons shows the 360 version having cleaner and sharper textures and more stable framerates, with little screen tearing. The case is opposite for PS3 version. It says the PS3 version is improved in some areas, but in others, it's noticeably worsened, to which they don't know why.

So it's wrong for him to choose the best source in favor of his argument, but it's completely ok for you to do it? Why do you think IGN's video looks so different? Why do all of these videos look different?

I'm sure they all can't be using the same TV. That might have something to do with it.

Uh huh. My TV is a 24 inch vore with HDMI option and I still could see the framerates being weird. I get a better resolution with other games since this is just a demo...

[thatbwoyblu]

shinobi602 wrote...

Teddie Sage wrote...

From what I seen so far, PS3 owns on sharper graphs but XBOX360's version is more stable on the framerates.

Interesting that you choose to only focus on IGN's comparison, which makes the 360 version look utter crap. Seriously, the 360 version in that video looks extremely washed out and Jacob looked like playdough when you see him. Absolute bs.

All the other websites, including Digital Foundry which is the best for comparisons shows the 360 version having cleaner and sharper textures and more stable framerates, with little screen tearing. The case is opposite for PS3 version. It says the PS3 version is improved in some areas, but in others, it's noticeably worsened, to which they don't know why.

Preach on:innocent:

[Darth_Ravor]

thatbwoyblu wrote...

PC elitists make me laugh.

(this link agrees with you) kinda

[Epic Legion]

Alistair4Ever wrote...

ITS A DEMO!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THERE WILL BE ISSUES WITH GRAPHICS AND FRAME RATE BECAUSE ITS NOT THE FULL GAME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! stop with the ducking console wars! who cares how a game looks or which console u have it on? its still the best game available period. i play games for story not graphics, and REBEL21 your just a troll with nothing better to do than argue with people on internet forums. mass effect is an excellent game and people are hating on it because bioware wants to expand the fan base and are all up in arms because u saw a portion of an unfinished game and it didn't look 100% perfect. get over yourselves.ps3 is a good console. 360 is a good console. i hate threads like these for the same reasons above. DEMO=UNFINISHED PORTION OF A GAME. and im going on because i cant think of a good way to end this post.............

Demo != Unfinished version. For your information, demo was released few days after this news: http://social.biowar...9/index/5473082
I guess talimancers rarely use their brains.

[shinobi602]

BringerOfChaos wrote...
So it's wrong for him to choose the best source in favor of his argument, but it's completely ok for you to do it? Why do you think IGN's video looks so different? Why do all of these videos look different?

I'm sure they all can't be using the same TV. That might have something to do with it.

When there's 5+ other sites coming to near the same conclusion vs. one that is completely on the other side, there is something up there.

I'm no fanboy. I love my PS3 and 360, but I play ME2 on my 360 often, and it no way in hell looks like IGN's video. It's nothing to with their TVs, the capture card captures the feed directly from the console, so there is something weird going on there.

[Crimmsonwind]

Remember when the forums had civil discussions where people didn't fling insults at each other, and had reasonable discussions based on facts?



Yeah, neither do I.

[Darth_Ravor]

Epic Legion wrote...

Alistair4Ever wrote...

ITS A DEMO!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THERE WILL BE ISSUES WITH GRAPHICS AND FRAME RATE BECAUSE ITS NOT THE FULL GAME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! stop with the ducking console wars! who cares how a game looks or which console u have it on? its still the best game available period. i play games for story not graphics, and REBEL21 your just a troll with nothing better to do than argue with people on internet forums. mass effect is an excellent game and people are hating on it because bioware wants to expand the fan base and are all up in arms because u saw a portion of an unfinished game and it didn't look 100% perfect. get over yourselves.ps3 is a good console. 360 is a good console. i hate threads like these for the same reasons above. DEMO=UNFINISHED PORTION OF A GAME. and im going on because i cant think of a good way to end this post.............

Demo != Unfinished version. For your information, demo was released few days after this news: http://social.biowar...9/index/5473082
I guess talimancers rarely use their brains.

im sorry but theres no way they had the ful retail release levels in their demo. they couldnt have gotten them ready for download that quickly.im sure that if u ask any game developer, including bioware, if their game demo was the final version of those levels they would laugh in your face........well not that rudely...