Friend, discussing validity of someone's posts is invalid, because it's off-topic.wolfsite wrote...
Zulu_DFA wrote...
Maybe it was trying to, but it came across as "Cerberus is utterly inept". But it's an inept piece of writing, nothing more.Cerberus Operative Ashley Williams wrote...
Zulu_DFA wrote...
But it does contribute a ton of "evidence" for the "Cerberus is inept" argument.
You clearly missed the point of Overlord. It was definitely contributing evidence to the "Cerberus is evil" argument.
Anyway, I have dismissed it.
Then all future posts from you are invalid and no longer have any say in this. If you want to support Cerberus you have to take everything that is Cerberus which includes Overlord, you can't just say oh Cerberus is great but since this makes us looks bad I declare it didn't happen.
There are quite a few real world examples I can use but frankly I feel I would be dishonouring those who died in them to use it in comparison to a video game.
I dismiss the "Overlord", because it's crap, not because it makes Ceberus look bad. In fact, it fails flat at making Cerberus look bad, because you can't really blame an in-universe entity for a plot hole. And just for the record, I would still dismiss it, even if it was a Council or Quarian or Eclipse-run "project".
Modifié par Zulu_DFA, 03 janvier 2011 - 10:51 .





Retour en haut





