Negix wrote...
"The notion that a video game is a business is obvious though. Hell,
any media is a business (whether it be books, songs, television, movies,
or anything else). They still require writers though--- and those said
writers are the Gods of the given diegesis."
agreed. however, those writers arent the ones who decide what game will be made. not entirely at least. every feature is something that has to be checked if it works and if it sells copies. now take the not save the world storyapproach for example: the whole game gets more complicated since you suddenly have more places to go to since you can also go where it doesn't help the issue. this makes developing more expensive.
anyhow, it doesn't matter wether something unique becomes more expensive or not, mainstream fantasy is just not risky. save the world, kill that and that blah blah is something that sells. experiments can totally fail (look at planescape torment for example... one of the best storylines ever but completely overlooked) and thus cost a lot of money. not many companies want to risk that..
Of course it's a collaborative process, but in the end it is something that is still given to the writers to do. They sit in a room and figure out what will happen from the beginning to end. Think Jordan Mechner. He wrote The Sands of Time, it went on to be a hit, it spawned sequels, and in the end he was even hired to write the screenplay for the movie.
I'm not asking for Bioware to completely reframe their work flow. I'm simply requesting that their be variety in the games. You make it sound as if I'm requesting an entire rework of the genre. Hell, one of the best selling RPGs of all time is the Fable series and their whole marketing campaign is about the fact that you can play as either good or bad. Clearly the sales of that game have proven than allowing a darker path is hardly a sub genre that may be risky. The Fallout series also allows you to go down different paths.
please excuse my bad use of the english language, its not my native language.
That's cool. It's not my native language either.

Schneidend wrote...
You
mean that guy who thought it would be a great idea to invade Russia in
winter and proceeded to be exiled to an island where he died suffering
miserably?
Oh, yeah, he is a badass.
Yeah, because that is totally the only thing he ever did. It's not like he conquered most of Europe and it's also not like he's the first man to sit in the Czar's throne despite being a foreign Emperor. Every General has wins and losses, that's how it works. Few, however, are remembered in the history as being brilliant tacticians. Napoleon just happens to be one of those few.
Anyway I'm going to stop feeding the trolls.
Modifié par iEthanol, 03 janvier 2011 - 11:38 .