InvincibleHero wrote...
Xeranx wrote...
Nice try at a reversal. It doesn't work. You tried putting words in someone else's mouth about a statement regarding equality by using babies to reverse the argument on them when anyone could see that blatant tactic. But no, I never said I was for punching female reporters regardless of what they say. I've never done it in game. I'm against your view that firing a bullet at Conrad Verner is certainly more ideal because he's male. Nevermind being on camera that's just something you don't do. You don't fire a weapon off at an individual that doesn't represent a threat to you. I could lie to Verner (though it's regarded as a renegade choice) and get him to stop that way. Absolutely no need for firing a round to "save his life" because he's mentally deficient. If the roles were reversed so that Conrad were the reporter and Al-jilani was the Shepard fanatic and choices were presented the same would you find firing the shot and hitting Conrad acceptable?
I never said because he's male. I said there is a context for the action and a benefit for Verner and Shepard as well. How does Shepard benefit form punching a helpless civilian on camera? In no way. You can't justify the action in any way.
Exactly what context is there in that scenario that justifies pulling a pistol and firing on an individual? I would love to hear your rationale. I would also very much like to learn about your stance on my idea of substituting Verner for the reporter and Al-Jilani for Conrad's position and letting it play out in the same manner. I wonder which you'd be ok with. Keep in mind that in ME you can cause Conrad to die.
Verner is acting very much a threat so much so the Asari matriarch/barmaid was going to singularity him. He was no innocent bystander but an agressor.
Do you know the context for why Conrad is even there? Yes, he's the aggressor, but he believes he has a good reason despite not being all there.
Yeah we get a menu of choices in a game like ME. They decide how to label the results but in real life Verner is armored, has a gun, and is hostile/causing a disturbance and threatening bar patrons and trying to steal the deed to the place. If he did not stand down real cops would kill a real life Verner. Explain your way out that. 
So now you're trying to wave away what happens with Conrad and you're saying he is threatening bar patrons? The owner of the bar stated that Conrad was causing trouble. I walked into the bar and the only person having any kind of discussion with Conrad was Atheytha (hope I spelled that right) and her responses to everything said by Conrad up until we initiate our own dialogue with him is, "uh huh". Her response is said with the tone that says she's either bored or tired of entertaining him. There were no bar patrons being harassed. In fact there were three guys watching an Asari table dance for them and elsewhere in the bar there was a Turian trying to come on to a Quarian female. If there was any danger there, you wouldn't know it to look at the bar patrons you say are being threatened.
Fact is there is no justification for discharging your weapon at an individual who doesn't present a clear and present danger to yourself or others. Talk about "totally gratuitous violence", by the time that shot is fired you already have his attention so there's no need to fire the shot. He isn't waving a gun around threatening to blow anyone away before or after you approach him. You're talking to him and the dialogue doesn't involve screaming or hostile action until you decide to hit him or shoot at his foot which is more likely to cause a panic. Then again, this doesn't worry you for whatever reason.