Give me my cookie and i'll stop itTaleroth wrote...
Gentlemen, you're all pretty. Stop the fighting.Dhiro wrote...
TheDarkBrotherhood wrote...
So, everyone being bi is not realistic, but when it comes to only seeing one//two gay couples in your life it's realistic, sorry, but i fail to see that, i'm sure you've seen a lot of famous gay/lesbian couples like ellen and portia, that being said, don't take it too personal, it's alright, i was just arguing with this person who said "not everyone should be bi because it's unrealistic".Dhiro wrote...
TheDarkBrotherhood wrote...
Really? give me any sign that made you think they are a couple, even if they actually seemed like a couple, it still isn't realistic to have only one gay couple in the whole game, which is my point.ishmaeltheforsaken wrote...
TheDarkBrotherhood wrote...
Whatever it is, before david confirmed it, they didn't seem like a couple at all, they never said it, they seemed like they had a typical business relationship, and they weren't openly gay, it's not like when you talk to one of them they say "hi i'm harren/wade, and this is my boyfriend wade/harren", and we are also not sure if they really are gay and not bi.
Uh... you could tell. Well, clearly you couldn't, but a lot of people could. There was subtext. The way the interacted with each other was certainly not a "typical business relationship."
How? Dragon Age: Origins last 1 ~ 2 years. In all the years I am alive I only saw one gay couple, a lesbian one, in fact, and one of the people involved was bi. I don't think that unrealistic at all.
Ellen and who? And why should I take it personal? And I fail in see how knowing only X gay couples being realistic should make everyone bisexual realistic too.
M/M Romances, DAII Style
#3501
Posté 27 février 2011 - 02:34
#3502
Posté 27 février 2011 - 02:34
I am with you on that and I think it's a "symmetry" thing.Ryzaki wrote...
Some Geth wrote...
Just to let you know that is not why I think they will not all be biRyzaki wrote...
For the love of god if I hear the "realistic" arguement I'll kick something. Very little about your party working together, following Hawke's commands, acquiescing to his/her decisions is realistic. The fact that a pirate queen who owes a powerful man money, a city guard, am elven blood mage, an abomination, a living weapon, a notorious spy master. Join you and go travelling with you is already pretty unrealistic. The fact that a mage can shoot fire from his/her hands and not get burned is pretty unrealistic, plenty of things in the game is unrealistic. But all of that gets a free pass..
Oh I know.
Frankly I think it's resource reasons. Just not pratical. But whatever. Fenris.
#3503
Posté 27 février 2011 - 02:37
Taleroth wrote...
You could have settled for just saying "fantasy."
The backbone of empowerment and wish fulfillment beyond realism are
built into the genre.
I wanted to be more detailed [smilie]../../../images/forum/emoticons/tongue.png[/smilie]
Ryzaki wrote...
Fine I'll give you magic. That doesn't excuse warriors being dropped from a dragon's mouth in massive plate and getting up with out breaking a single bone.
Necessary for gameplay. This is something that doesn't make sense by the setting's internal logic, but is required for it to make sense as a game.
#3504
Posté 27 février 2011 - 02:38
Dhiro wrote...
Lucy_Glitter wrote...
Fenris/MHawke
WOOHOO
Fenris on top?
I don't know you.
I don't know you. D:
#3505
Posté 27 février 2011 - 02:39
Pseudocognition wrote...
Dhiro wrote...
Lucy_Glitter wrote...
Fenris/MHawke
WOOHOO
Fenris on top?
I don't know you.
I don't know you. D:
:<
#3506
Posté 27 février 2011 - 02:39
#3507
Posté 27 février 2011 - 02:41
Ryzaki wrote...
ishmaeltheforsaken wrote...
Ryzaki wrote...
long quote on realism vs unrealism
^opposing quote of same topic
Fine I'll give you magic. That doesn't excuse warriors being dropped from a dragon's mouth in massive plate and getting up with out breaking a single bone.
I'd like to add being a Circle mage and never being given the choice to heal when you find wounded people. Why is it I can't heal the injured scout in either the Brecilian Forest or the Kokari Wilds? And why couldn't I save that guy who told us about Ostagar (so we could return)? I'm a bloody mage who can revive Alistair after he's bbq'd by a dragon, after all!!
Modifié par Blue_Shayde, 27 février 2011 - 02:42 .
#3508
Posté 27 février 2011 - 02:42
Pseudocognition wrote...
Dhiro wrote...
Lucy_Glitter wrote...
Fenris/MHawke
WOOHOO
Fenris on top?
I don't know you.
I don't know you. D:
I like my idea the best: diplomatic Hawke is bottom, aggressive Hawke is top, and charming Hawke is random.
MorningBird wrote...
... so many... quotes... I don't even... *brain explodes*
Nuuuuuuuuuu! *puts head back together*
#3509
Posté 27 février 2011 - 02:42
ishmaeltheforsaken wrote...
Pseudocognition wrote...
Dhiro wrote...
Lucy_Glitter wrote...
I like my idea the best: diplomatic Hawke is bottom, aggressive Hawke is top, and charming Hawke is random.MorningBird wrote...
... so many... quotes... I don't even... *brain explodes*
Nuuuuuuuuuu! *puts head back together*
it would be fun to choose.
Modifié par Blue_Shayde, 27 février 2011 - 02:43 .
#3510
Posté 27 février 2011 - 02:45
It indeed would be fun if Fenris could ask hawke if he's Top or BottomBlue_Shayde wrote...
ishmaeltheforsaken wrote...
Pseudocognition wrote...
Dhiro wrote...
Lucy_Glitter wrote...
I like my idea the best: diplomatic Hawke is bottom, aggressive Hawke is top, and charming Hawke is random.MorningBird wrote...
... so many... quotes... I don't even... *brain explodes*
Nuuuuuuuuuu! *puts head back together*
it would be fun to choose.<3
#3511
Posté 27 février 2011 - 02:45
So let me get this straight (pun not intended). Fenris is the (or a) bi option, but since the article also mentions that S/S romances have been "extended" or "increased", Anders may still be one too?
Modifié par Blacklash93, 27 février 2011 - 02:46 .
#3512
Posté 27 février 2011 - 02:46
Anders is all but confirmed. Fenris is the one in question.Blacklash93 wrote...
Wow... a lot has gone on here.
So let me get this straight (pun not intended). Fenris is the (or a bi) option, but since the article akso mentions that S/S romances have been "extended" or "increased", Anders may still be one too?
#3513
Posté 27 février 2011 - 02:47
Blacklash93 wrote...
Wow... a lot has gone on here.
So let me get this straight (pun not intended). Fenris is the (or a) bi option, but since the article also mentions that S/S romances have been "extended" or "increased", Anders may still be one too?
AUFGESTOCKT!
#3514
Posté 27 février 2011 - 02:47
Where's my cookie?Taleroth wrote...
Anders is all but confirmed. Fenris is the one in question.Blacklash93 wrote...
Wow... a lot has gone on here.
So let me get this straight (pun not intended). Fenris is the (or a bi) option, but since the article akso mentions that S/S romances have been "extended" or "increased", Anders may still be one too?
#3515
Posté 27 février 2011 - 02:47
Taleroth wrote...
Anders is all but confirmed. Fenris is the one in question.Blacklash93 wrote...
Wow... a lot has gone on here.
So let me get this straight (pun not intended). Fenris is the (or a bi) option, but since the article akso mentions that S/S romances have been "extended" or "increased", Anders may still be one too?
They're both all but confirmed.
Conclusion: EVERYONE IS BI!
#3516
Posté 27 février 2011 - 02:48
Ishmael has it.TheDarkBrotherhood wrote...
Where's my cookie?Taleroth wrote...
Anders is all but confirmed. Fenris is the one in question.Blacklash93 wrote...
Wow... a lot has gone on here.
So let me get this straight (pun not intended). Fenris is the (or a bi) option, but since the article akso mentions that S/S romances have been "extended" or "increased", Anders may still be one too?.
#3517
Posté 27 février 2011 - 02:49
MorningBird wrote...
Taleroth wrote...
Anders is all but confirmed. Fenris is the one in question.Blacklash93 wrote...
Wow... a lot has gone on here.
So let me get this straight (pun not intended). Fenris is the (or a bi) option, but since the article akso mentions that S/S romances have been "extended" or "increased", Anders may still be one too?
They're both all but confirmed.
Conclusion: EVERYONE IS BI!
Yep. Anders is as confirmed as Fenris, still. BI until proven straight!
#3518
Posté 27 février 2011 - 02:50
Ishamael stole my cookie?!Taleroth wrote...
Ishmael has it.TheDarkBrotherhood wrote...
Where's my cookie?Taleroth wrote...
Anders is all but confirmed. Fenris is the one in question.Blacklash93 wrote...
Wow... a lot has gone on here.
So let me get this straight (pun not intended). Fenris is the (or a bi) option, but since the article akso mentions that S/S romances have been "extended" or "increased", Anders may still be one too?.
#3519
Posté 27 février 2011 - 02:50
Is there more evidence on that front since yesterday? There was nothing conclusive then.Taleroth wrote...
Anders is all but confirmed. Fenris is the one in question.Blacklash93 wrote...
Wow... a lot has gone on here.
So let me get this straight (pun not intended). Fenris is the (or a bi) option, but since the article akso mentions that S/S romances have been "extended" or "increased", Anders may still be one too?
A gaming mag pointing to Fenris seems much more credible than the Anders speculation.
#3520
Posté 27 février 2011 - 02:52
TheDarkBrotherhood wrote...
Ishamael stole my cookie?!Taleroth wrote...
Ishmael has it.TheDarkBrotherhood wrote...
Where's my cookie?Taleroth wrote...
Anders is all but confirmed. Fenris is the one in question.Blacklash93 wrote...
Wow... a lot has gone on here.
So let me get this straight (pun not intended). Fenris is the (or a bi) option, but since the article akso mentions that S/S romances have been "extended" or "increased", Anders may still be one too?.
, THE ORDER DICTATES!
*hastily brushes crumbs off her chest* "Whu cukee?" she asks, trying not to open her mouth.
#3521
Posté 27 février 2011 - 02:52
Blacklash93 wrote...
Is there more evidence on that front since yesterday? There was nothing conclusive then.Taleroth wrote...
Anders is all but confirmed. Fenris is the one in question.Blacklash93 wrote...
Wow... a lot has gone on here.
So let me get this straight (pun not intended). Fenris is the (or a bi) option, but since the article akso mentions that S/S romances have been "extended" or "increased", Anders may still be one too?
A gaming mag pointing to Fenris seems much more credible than the Anders speculation.
That's about it right now. Just the gaming mag and no word from the devs. =P
#3522
Posté 27 février 2011 - 02:55
Some Geth wrote...
I am with you on that and I think it's a "symmetry" thing.
You'll have to explain the symmetry thing to me. I'm kind of dense.
#3523
Posté 27 février 2011 - 02:55
i only want my cookie, is that too much to ask?ishmaeltheforsaken wrote...
TheDarkBrotherhood wrote...
Ishamael stole my cookie?!Taleroth wrote...
Ishmael has it.TheDarkBrotherhood wrote...
Where's my cookie?Taleroth wrote...
Anders is all but confirmed. Fenris is the one in question.Blacklash93 wrote...
Wow... a lot has gone on here.
So let me get this straight (pun not intended). Fenris is the (or a bi) option, but since the article akso mentions that S/S romances have been "extended" or "increased", Anders may still be one too?.
, THE ORDER DICTATES!
*hastily brushes crumbs off her chest* "Whu cukee?" she asks, trying not to open her mouth.
#3524
Posté 27 février 2011 - 02:57
#3525
Posté 27 février 2011 - 02:58
Sccowan wrote...
Man... Miss a day of reading the forums and you miss alot - Instead of going back and reading and reading and reading (and laughing alot) could someone please tell me how this confirmation was gathered? Was there a leak? or GASP did someone from BW actually think it was time to be fair and throw us a morsel of good news?
A German magazine says that Fenris is an M/M romance. Also, bisexual romances have been AUFGESTOCKT.





Retour en haut




