This is pretty late, but I think the people pulling out the "realism" argument are not taking into account that there is a difference between being bisexual and being flexible. Being gay or straight doesn't necessarily mean 100% exclusivity. I've known lesbians and gay men who have experienced occasional attraction to the opposite gender (hell, the man even happily married said woman) as well as straight people who have experienced attraction to the same, and that doesn't invalidate their preference (which is just that, a
preference) or their identity as gay or straight.
I mean, the fact that I, nine times out of ten, prefer cake to pie doesn't mean I'm never going to eat pie for the rest of my life or that there aren't types of pie I quite like. At the same time, the fact that I like a couple pies does not in any way mean that my liking of pie is even remotely equal to my love of cake. I'm still a cake lover, when all is said and done.
I think there being four members of your party who are flexible but not necessarily
bisexual is well within the realm of probability. And I hope there are. Crow will never have tasted so delicious.
Modifié par Nefarious Asparagus, 27 février 2011 - 05:12 .