Aller au contenu

Photo

Impossible costumes?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
107 réponses à ce sujet

#76
Spartas Husky

Spartas Husky
  • Members
  • 6 151 messages

MaaZeus wrote...

Spartas Husky wrote...

MaaZeus wrote...

Spartas Husky wrote...

MaaZeus wrote...

Cranyx wrote...

^ actually that's a common misconception. If they were in a vacuum(which I don't think they ever were) then yes, the few floating air particles would be freezing, but there would be so few of them that you would actually not freeze. A human can survive in a vacuum without permanent harm as long as they have air supply, your ear don't burst and your eyes don't pop.

There's a NASA article about it here:  imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/ask_astro/answers/970603.html




You can survive, for few minutes that is. Human body can resist vacuum for short time, but it will give in eventually and your body starts to swell and cause a lot of pain. This has been tested too, not in space but in controlled enviroments.

And you are correct, in vacuum heat transfer is incredibly poor, even if space is absolute zero cold you wont feel it for some time. Unless you hit gas cloud or other particles that are as cold as the space around it, they can transfer the heat immidietly and may snap freeze you.


And you are wrong, there are atleast two places where in ME2 you are in complete vacuum and cold space. Derelict reaper after you blow its Mass Effect field and Geth station (geth do not require air nor heat, waste of resources) where you complete a whole mission.


no idea what the page is saying but in the 70's test were made in many depressurized chambers and in space confirming you last ess than 3 minutes before dying. ima find it but the **** of it might not be that you would die but the simple pressure laws ensured, from high to low. And while the sci fi of you exploding is a lie, it is true your body losses what air it has knocking you out within seconds of exposure. This was also confirmed in Russian accidents aboard their space flights so I have no idea where you guys are getting that we are superman and can resist a couple of minutes in vaccum.

Without even counting the aforementioned the mere radiation and exposure to cosmic particles would destroy your organic ability to maintain cell integrity.

But just fmro the top of my astronomy class. When there is no atmospheric pressure water does not hold its form. Water is a tricky substance and is in basic physics and chemistry that atmospheric pressure gives water is liquid form, thus if pressure from a planet or otherwise is not present water expands nearly instantaneous which means turns into gas and boils. Any part of your body exposed to vaccum that holds or is covered in water will blow or melt; aka your tongue will be destroyed in severe injury and your eyes will melt. This is also reported in Russian accident when the Astranout had a suit rupture and all he felt was his tongue being burned out of him ecause of the saliva quickly expanding.

By tests as well your tissue will swell, and although you will not explode like some weird sci fi movie it will kill you after a minute or two

In the end you dont survive in space, period. The pressure problem quickly plays a trick on your system knocing you out within seconds, and the cosmic rays as well as a lack of heat transfer will make sure you boil from the inside out within the next 60 to 120 seconds. So no humans cannot survive in vacuum, without some sort of shields against cosmic rays and the changing state of matter within your body.

Test in chambers and accidents in space have not been lethal but have been close and they just had suit malfunctions.

In space things either boil or freeze there is no space in between. If your far away from a heat producing body you will freeze after w/e surface water boils, if your too close to a heat source you will boil since there is nothing to carry heat away from you. If we could  survive in vaccum by just having air supply for at least 60 seconds I would have think astronauts who went to the moon would have at least peed on the moon for the hell of it... or placed their bare foot on moon ground, or touched it with their bare hands.



That is what I meant with few minutes. You will black out due to complete lack of oxygen in some seconds and if you try to hold your breath, it will rupture your lungs. In few minutes your body starts to swell, your blood and other liquids starts to boil and severe damage starts to happen. You might still survive this if you get dragged into safety in time like that astronaut, but vacuum exposure will definetly kill you and fast.


nah dude sry should nto have quoted u. Was talking to cranyx  because he said  en quote:

"A human can survive in a vacuum without permanent harm as long as they
have air supply, your ear don't burst and your eyes don't pop."


which is not accurate

russian astronauts with just a minor suit failure had medium burns on their tongues and only had so because they spend less than a few seconds with a rupture. Complete exposure would be even worse.




No harm done. :)




About your body melting, I'm not really sure if that happens. Liquid when it is in vacuum boils, but it is not hot. It is still same temperature as it was but due to lack of pressure its boiling point lowers and therefore it vaporates, becomes steam. Opposite situation is also possible and used. In normal air pressure (1 bar give or take IIRC) water starts to boil in 100 celsius. But in higher pressure the boiling point gets higher. This is effectively used in modern car engine cooling where the cooling liquid is pressurised so it wont boil even if it reaches 100C. Thats why you are not allowed to open the cooling liquid container of your car when it is hot because the released pressure will splash the hot water all around burning you.

About the russian astronaut (kosmonaut) I dont remember anything about tongue burning, just saliva boiling. It still shouldnt be hot due to above mentioned reasons, unless my physics class failed me completely.


No no, not hot as in "temperature".... although the astranaout did reported that it felt as "burning". Absence of water within tissue creates discrepancies in body temperate that although no heat is involved does create burns.

Now the body does not melt because the water is underneath the tissue, the only water that "boils" although boil would be somewhat incorrect, the better word would be it evaporates with or without heat, simply because the lack of pressure of any kind allows the water to expand thus becoming gas. The process while not necessarily requiring heat does register in the body as such.

Saliva will evaporate and the quick of doing so does make the particles move at incredible speeds to turn into gas and in doing so do create some heat.

The eyes is the same, neither our eyes nor tongue are made to resist much heat... unless is my freacking parents which they can drink damn coffee lava for all they care... but they are freaks so exception must be made.

Nevertheless any water within the tissue is under pressure, thus it does not evaporate but it still conserves heat since there is no "atmosphere" to draw heat from you. When there is no atmosphere and your accumulating vast amount of heat too fast... well that is just nasty way to die.  Now.... how exactly does a body react when far enough of a star, or heat producing body, I dont know; are cosmic rays enough to induce heat to be captured or do you just become a rock of sorts?... not really sure on that one.


Like I said, there is no middle ground in space when it comes to water... it either boils or freezes, only factor that changes things are pressure; whether it comes from magnetism of a planet's core or simply because the water was trapped under alot of mass from the start.

Modifié par Spartas Husky, 08 janvier 2011 - 05:46 .


#77
MaaZeus

MaaZeus
  • Members
  • 1 851 messages

Spartas Husky wrote...
No no, not hot as in "temperature".... although the astranaout did reported that it felt as "burning". Absence of water within tissue creates discrepancies in body temperate that although no heat is involved does create burns.

Now the body does not melt because the water is underneath the tissue, the only water that "boils" although boil would be somewhat incorrect, the better word would be it evaporates with or without heat, simply because the lack of pressure of any kind allows the water to expand thus becoming gas. The process while not necessarily requiring heat does register in the body as such.

Saliva will evaporate and the quick of doing so does make the particles move at incredible speeds to turn into gas and in doing so do create some heat.

The eyes is the same, neither our eyes nor tongue are made to resist much heat... unless is my freacking parents which they can drink damn coffee lava for all they care... but they are freaks so exception must be made.

Nevertheless any water within the tissue is under pressure, thus it does not evaporate but it still conserves heat since there is no "atmosphere" to draw heat from you. When there is no atmosphere and your accumulating vast amount of heat too fast... well that is just nasty way to die.  Now.... how exactly does a body react when far enough of a star, or heat producing body, I dont know; are cosmic rays enough to induce heat to be captured or do you just become a rock of sorts?... not really sure on that one.


Like I said, there is no middle ground in space when it comes to water... it either boils or freezes, only factor that changes things are pressure; whether it comes from magnetism of a planet's core or simply because the water was trapped under alot of mass from the start.



Oh. Makes sense now. Though about radiation, considering we are talking about Scifi video game I think we can leave that out of the equation when it comes to dangers of space as we would be splitting hairs. Space without protection = bad either way.
I forgot to mention that when we took down the derelict reapers mass effect field not only you are in vacuum but also you are within the crushing gravity of a brown dwarf. My guess is that it would turn you into a pancake in a second, envirosuits or no. And yet  they were able to throw Legion into the Normandy... :D

Modifié par MaaZeus, 08 janvier 2011 - 05:58 .


#78
Spartas Husky

Spartas Husky
  • Members
  • 6 151 messages

MaaZeus wrote...

Spartas Husky wrote...
No no, not hot as in "temperature".... although the astranaout did reported that it felt as "burning". Absence of water within tissue creates discrepancies in body temperate that although no heat is involved does create burns.

Now the body does not melt because the water is underneath the tissue, the only water that "boils" although boil would be somewhat incorrect, the better word would be it evaporates with or without heat, simply because the lack of pressure of any kind allows the water to expand thus becoming gas. The process while not necessarily requiring heat does register in the body as such.

Saliva will evaporate and the quick of doing so does make the particles move at incredible speeds to turn into gas and in doing so do create some heat.

The eyes is the same, neither our eyes nor tongue are made to resist much heat... unless is my freacking parents which they can drink damn coffee lava for all they care... but they are freaks so exception must be made.

Nevertheless any water within the tissue is under pressure, thus it does not evaporate but it still conserves heat since there is no "atmosphere" to draw heat from you. When there is no atmosphere and your accumulating vast amount of heat too fast... well that is just nasty way to die.  Now.... how exactly does a body react when far enough of a star, or heat producing body, I dont know; are cosmic rays enough to induce heat to be captured or do you just become a rock of sorts?... not really sure on that one.


Like I said, there is no middle ground in space when it comes to water... it either boils or freezes, only factor that changes things are pressure; whether it comes from magnetism of a planet's core or simply because the water was trapped under alot of mass from the start.



Oh. Makes sense now. Though about radiation, considering we are talking about Scifi video game I think we can leave that out of the equation when it comes to dangers of space as we would be splitting hairs. Space without protection = bad either way.
I forgot to mention that when we took down the derelict reapers mass effect field not only you are in vacuum but also you are within the crushing gravity of a brown dwarf. My guess is that it would turn you into a pancake in a second, envirosuits or no. And yet  they were able to throw Legion into the Normandy... :D


I would say gravity applies the same way, if your "free" falling, your not a pancake until there is something below you that stops you.

my view on that is that your mass effect fields generetates enough mass for you to remain mobile to the reaper frame, otherwise you would be in free falling. But not too much so that you are completely grounded or dying of pressure.

Either way  I keep saying whoever thought of baldiness as protection, tattoos as if Jack was an ancient celtic warrior, or skin tight leather as armor has to be fired... or at least slaped a couple of times.

#79
Cranyx

Cranyx
  • Members
  • 80 messages
I believe everyone who has skin exposure to a vacuum is either biotic (temporary biotic fields) or an alien (no one here can define how their bodies would react)



But no offense to people arguing about what would happen, but did you read the article? That wasn't some guy spouting, it was a NASA scientist and no one here (I'm assuming) has that level of qualifications, so when in doubt, he's probably right.

#80
aeetos21

aeetos21
  • Members
  • 1 478 messages
Hardsuits, everyone in the ME universe is wearing one because when shields fail your hardsuit can still soak up some of the damage. It also allows you to fight in zero G and vacuums such as space. Every merc, pirate, marine, or what have you is wearing one EXCEPT for members of your own squad!

There is zero excuse here and as people have already shown there is plenty of room for art while still giving characters a full hardsuit including helmet. In ME1 there was an option to disable helmets for aesthetic reasons, something I used frequently.

As for biotic or kinetic barriers providing suitable barriers in a vacuum? Yes that's why when Shepard's O2 seals were punctured during the destruction of the Normandy he immediately ran out of air and was unconscious in about five seconds give or take.

There just aren't any excuses for this one, other than sex appeal, there just aren't.

Modifié par aeetos21, 08 janvier 2011 - 11:21 .


#81
MaaZeus

MaaZeus
  • Members
  • 1 851 messages

aeetos21 wrote...

Hardsuits, everyone in the ME universe is wearing one because when shields fail your hardsuit can still soak up some of the damage. It also allows you to fight in zero G and vacuums such as space. Every merc, pirate, marine, or what have you is wearing one EXCEPT for members of your own squad!

There is zero excuse here and as people have already shown there is plenty of room for art while still giving characters a full hardsuit including helmet. In ME1 there was an option to disable helmets for aesthetic reasons, something I used frequently.

As for biotic or kinetic barriers providing suitable barriers in a vacuum? Yes that's why when Shepard's O2 seals were punctured during the destruction of the Normandy he immediately ran out of air and was unconscious in about five seconds give or take.

There just aren't any excuses for this one, other than sex appeal, there just aren't.



This pretty much sums it up.

#82
Sorrel

Sorrel
  • Members
  • 418 messages
I like members of my squad having some personal and sex appeal; when they are ON THE SHIP which is where that kind of behaviour belongs -- in personal time, time between missions, etc. I love hearing the banter between squadmates, personal observations etc but the squad needs to be dressed for the job no ifs ands or buts! And as femshep clearly demonstrates, one can show a gorgeous figure even whilst wearing heavy duty firepower resistance.



I wanna be like Sgt Apone going RRRRRR, ABSOLUTELY BADASSES and sending my two squaddies out with me to stop some bullets. Stopping hearts is aboard the ship. I don't want to deal with Miranda falling and breaking her ankle because she ran too fast in that non-regulation footwear.

#83
Spartas Husky

Spartas Husky
  • Members
  • 6 151 messages

Cranyx wrote...

I believe everyone who has skin exposure to a vacuum is either biotic (temporary biotic fields) or an alien (no one here can define how their bodies would react)

But no offense to people arguing about what would happen, but did you read the article? That wasn't some guy spouting, it was a NASA scientist and no one here (I'm assuming) has that level of qualifications, so when in doubt, he's probably right.


dont really care if Einstein is telling me that if I jump out of a building I fall towards the sky, experiements and accidents from the past have confirmed that that isn't true.

Same here. Google it there are Russian accidents that show that just a small suit failure insured burns in your tongue.

ON another thing of what you said, that we could survive with just air supply. If you have air within your lungs due to an air supply without any sort of pressurized suit, you will literally make your lungs fail, give you heart attacks and god knows what else. With depressuration any air hold within your body follows the law of high to low, and air will leave your body forcefully. If there is any air within your lungs your eardrums will explode to allow the air to exit. Oxygen bubbles will form within seconds in your arteries ensuring a quick heart attack.

Having an "oxygen" supply is worse than just soffocating, at least soffocating you got some time while your concious.

#84
Radwar

Radwar
  • Members
  • 851 messages
Yes, I totally agree. Having teammates not wearing any armor on the battlefield like it was in ME1 is just plain dumb. Why you would go into battle without the additional armor protection is beyond me, especially since shields & barriers are so easy to disrupt. I mean you don't see any of your enemies (even biotics) not wearing any armor, do you? Sorry, but I think the design team got a cramp in the head with this one.
It wouldn't be so bad if Bioware didn't make the game so hard to Mod. I've searched everywhere for Mod armors for your whole squad, but to no avail. If somebody found some, please give me link!

Modifié par Radwar, 09 janvier 2011 - 01:55 .


#85
lovgreno

lovgreno
  • Members
  • 3 523 messages

aeetos21 wrote...

There just aren't any excuses for this one, other than sex appeal, there just aren't.

Not even that as heavy armour can be sexy. Then again that is a question of personal taste I guess. But I don't need to see things exposed to find it attractive

#86
Spartas Husky

Spartas Husky
  • Members
  • 6 151 messages

aeetos21 wrote...


other than sex appeal


that pretty much describes EA...like companies


MaaZeus wrote...
 And yet  they were able to throw Legion into the Normandy... [smilie]../../../images/forum/emoticons/grin.png[/smilie]



I guess that supports somewhat my idea that your suit does reduce or increase your mass a little bit.

Modifié par Spartas Husky, 09 janvier 2011 - 02:20 .


#87
JKA_Nozyspy

JKA_Nozyspy
  • Members
  • 161 messages

Spartas Husky wrote...

Simply put, that is EA at work. EA goes for image over brains.


I wouldnt be surprised...


Avilia wrote...

Its difficult to show T&A in a space suit?


Im sure im not the only one that digs women in armour. Image IPB

This was one aspect of ME2 i really didnt like, since Mass Effect thus far has made a great effort to make the science behind the stuff ingame believable. Jack running around half naked on planets with apparently no atmosphere (instant death) kinda spoils that. Image IPB

I think these costumes and the fact that Bioware removed alot of the RPG elements (You used to be able to go to a shop on a planet and find new stuff every time, now once you have bought all the upgrades, thats it, theres no reason to bother going back.) from ME2 almost feels like they have taken a step back from the scientific and physical realism and believability that made the first game so fresh and special.

Modifié par JKA_Nozyspy, 09 janvier 2011 - 01:46 .


#88
Tasker

Tasker
  • Members
  • 1 320 messages
Although I could be wrong and if i'm not then they'll probably deny it anyway, ( Image IPB Image IPB  ) I've always been of the opinion that when EA bought Bioware out they wanted a quick return for their money, and even though ME2 wasn't finished properly, they decided it was "good enough", and chucked it out the door. 

This is why I think a lot of the ME1 elements were butchered - in order to make the game at least playable.

Also, don't forget if a franchise is popular,  EA can't stand not releasing a sequel every year and any game that has more than 2 years of development is a no no. 

Why else is Dragon Age 2 being turned into an ME2 clone. It's a shame, but I really think that  the days of Bioware being able to release stuff when they feel it's finished - regardless of wether it's through it being a really complicated game or just that they feel it needs polish - are long gone.

Modifié par Orkboy, 09 janvier 2011 - 03:20 .


#89
Badpie

Badpie
  • Members
  • 3 344 messages

Siansonea II wrote...

It's a game. Just go with it.


No. I'm sorry that doesn't fly when someone has marketed their game to be this awesome story driven rpg and then ignore simple things like the fact that exposing someone's skin to the vacuum of space would be deadly.

I'm thoroughly annoyed at the lack or armor or proper clothing for the squad during combat in ME2.  And literally the only reason for them doing that is to make sure Samara's cleavage shows, Jack's tattoos are always visible and that Miranda can show off her ******.  

Even if they had just added a little something to their casual outfits to make them more combat worthy I would have been fine.  It would have looked like they tried.  But I'm sorry, you don't go into a war wearing a belt bra - I don't care how angry you are, if you get hit you're still squishy.  This isn't a Marvel comic, yet there was enough spandex in ME2 to make it one.

Why was it so much to ask that they looked the way they did on the ship, but then had some kind of protective outfit for combat?  That's the way they did it in ME1 and I believed it much more.

So to say "it's a game, just go with it" is entirely ridiculous.  You keep saying that and the writers and developers will be able to do whatever they want.  "No, people can breathe in outer space now...there's...a chip or something..  yeah....just go with it."   "I realize this gigantic plot hole makes no sense whatsoever, but you know what?  Just go with it."

Yeah no.  The creators of the game get paid to do things right.  So they should.

#90
Guest_Brodyaha_*

Guest_Brodyaha_*
  • Guests

Badpie wrote...

Siansonea II wrote...

It's a game. Just go with it.


No. I'm sorry that doesn't fly when someone has marketed their game to be this awesome story driven rpg and then ignore simple things like the fact that exposing someone's skin to the vacuum of space would be deadly.

I'm thoroughly annoyed at the lack or armor or proper clothing for the squad during combat in ME2.  And literally the only reason for them doing that is to make sure Samara's cleavage shows, Jack's tattoos are always visible and that Miranda can show off her ******.  

Even if they had just added a little something to their casual outfits to make them more combat worthy I would have been fine.  It would have looked like they tried.  But I'm sorry, you don't go into a war wearing a belt bra - I don't care how angry you are, if you get hit you're still squishy.  This isn't a Marvel comic, yet there was enough spandex in ME2 to make it one.


Agreed.
It was rather silly on the Shadow Broker ship too, that Mordin and Liara are only wearing masks while the rest of them are exposed to the harsh winds of Hagalaz.  And that's just one example.

#91
Cranyx

Cranyx
  • Members
  • 80 messages
Although the impractical costumes can be annoying at times, I think this thread is a little too harsh. Every game/movie can be a little unrealistic and yes, EA went a little overboard, but to be honest, it was only a very minor flaw.



You guys act as if it ruined the entire game, when ME2 was as good if not superior to its predecessor. The game was still very realistic and aside from a few instances, never really took you out of the immersion.



I'm sure you guys will flame on about how the slightest changes for the sake of artistic license is blasphemy, but the costumes really weren't that bad.

#92
Guest_Brodyaha_*

Guest_Brodyaha_*
  • Guests
Just because we criticize or talk about something doesn't mean we hate it. It means that we think there's an issue with it. Ultimately, it's BioWare's game, they can make everyone wear lingerie in space, or have Ashley Williams come down during the final Reaper battle wearing angel wings and a simple sash if they want.

Realistic?  No, and I'm sure many people would criticize that. What if the rest of ME3 was epic, but that part was silly?

Just because they find fault with that doesn't mean they would hate the rest of ME3.

Modifié par Brodyaha, 09 janvier 2011 - 07:02 .


#93
Cranyx

Cranyx
  • Members
  • 80 messages
But the point is, its not as bad as those hypotheticals, they're just slightly over the top.




#94
MaaZeus

MaaZeus
  • Members
  • 1 851 messages

Cranyx wrote...

Although the impractical costumes can be annoying at times, I think this thread is a little too harsh. Every game/movie can be a little unrealistic and yes, EA went a little overboard, but to be honest, it was only a very minor flaw.

You guys act as if it ruined the entire game, when ME2 was as good if not superior to its predecessor. The game was still very realistic and aside from a few instances, never really took you out of the immersion.

I'm sure you guys will flame on about how the slightest changes for the sake of artistic license is blasphemy, but the costumes really weren't that bad.



On the contrary, ME2 is one of the best games I have played last 10 years and a game that I still keep on playing. But despite that (or perhaps because of) its faults are so obvious that I cannot help but notice them and clench my teeth at their stupidity. They wont ruin the whole game, but they sure as hell annoy the living **** out of me.

Modifié par MaaZeus, 09 janvier 2011 - 07:17 .


#95
Cranyx

Cranyx
  • Members
  • 80 messages
I have a different reaction when I see them, I don't get angry, I just chuckle a little bit at the ridiculousness. In my opinion it can be a little humorous, but not too irritating.



The same way I laugh when in Star Wars they don't use the ships that can go the speed of light (AKA super missiles) and just fly them straight into the death star.

#96
Iakus

Iakus
  • Members
  • 30 315 messages

Cranyx wrote...

I have a different reaction when I see them, I don't get angry, I just chuckle a little bit at the ridiculousness. In my opinion it can be a little humorous, but not too irritating.

.


I chuckled at thermal clips.

I stopped laughing at the outfits.  ME1, as said before, at least made an attempt to keep things believable.

#97
MaaZeus

MaaZeus
  • Members
  • 1 851 messages

Cranyx wrote...

I have a different reaction when I see them, I don't get angry, I just chuckle a little bit at the ridiculousness. In my opinion it can be a little humorous, but not too irritating.

The same way I laugh when in Star Wars they don't use the ships that can go the speed of light (AKA super missiles) and just fly them straight into the death star.




I wouldnt be so angry either, if it werent for ME1. ME1 setted ME universes standards very high. Ray Muzyka said in one interview that they wanted ME universe to be something between light Star wars like scifi fantasy and Larry Niven's hardcore Scifi, closer to the latter.

And they succeeded. But they threw it all away, and I am angry what they did to this fantastic universe and because it is so blatantly obvious why they did. If they would have had ME2 art direction right from the ME1, I wouldnt have that much of an issue as I would just keep it as part of this Scifi universe. I would still keep it dumb though!

I am a proud man and I react very strong and negatively to cheap tricks, like oversexualisation, trading consistency and artistic integrity and depth for more eyecandy and flash and so on. Perhaps this explains why I react the way I do?

This issue isnt exactly in a Midichlorian class if you know what I mean, but direction Bioware took is not very promising...

Modifié par MaaZeus, 09 janvier 2011 - 08:06 .


#98
Tasker

Tasker
  • Members
  • 1 320 messages
I usually play ME on the XBox but earlier I decided to try out the ME2 demo on the PS3 just to see how it was -  Good god, how bad is that frame stutter and screen tearing?  -  and I realised something.

People say - " Oh but they have biotic barriers and never go out into total vacum, so it's perfectly acceptible to wear nothing but tatoos in space"

But, replay the prologue.  Joker is neither wearing a spacesuit, nor capable of creating biotic barriers. Yet to escape the Normandy he has to get to the pod and wait for Shepard to press the button, by passing into and staying in - total vacum. He should be dead.

Now to be honest, if this had been the first game in the trilogy, I don't think I would have been all that bothered about it, but they did it so much better in ME1, In ME1 it was at least plausible that they could survive in combat and vacum/harsh environments.

Modifié par Orkboy, 09 janvier 2011 - 08:26 .


#99
Cranyx

Cranyx
  • Members
  • 80 messages
I've figured out why they changed from armor to no armor in the second game:



"Council, my elite fighting force is trained and ready to go, we just need some armor."



"Ah yes, 'armor', we have dismissed these claims."

#100
Rykoth

Rykoth
  • Members
  • 631 messages
There's a simple reason why Miranda wears what Miranda wears.

Look up the actress who plays her.

Yvonne Strahovski does not belong in a full body suit. 3D rendition of her or not.