Systemlord Baal wrote...
I know what the GI article said, but it was actually very clear on the squadmates, so I'm surprised that they(the guys in the video) go that wrong. Could they have other sources?
Considering Mass Effect is Bioware's big sci-fi IP that they've repeatedly stated they have many plans for beyond the Shepard trilogy, it makes complete sense for them to be tightlipped. The franchise has proven that western based RPGs can well hold thier own against the JRPG monolith.
With that said, it fits that the only information that'll be dished out will be with media that branches across all the available platforms of the game. GI, E3, IGN, the forums here..etc... so everyone else will be filtering through the official release stuff. Another thing to concider is reviewer bias. They're the same as us here with thier faves, dislikes and whatnot so no matter how even keel they insist they are, the bias will still be there and lead to misinterpreting info, highlighting minor things and glossing over major.
So for an example, a reviewer who loves the hardcore shooter type game will tend to focus more on those aspects with maybe throwing a bone towards the RPG aspects and unofficially sending the message that ME3'll be more like a hardcore shooter. Equally one who favoured a different character like Liara, Tali or Miranda will be more focussed on reporting their appearance in game with a possible mention of the VS appearing somewhere and making it sound like they've been flung in like a background character.
At this point unless the info's coming from the mouth of Bioware, or a major unveiling like the GI article or the reveals at E3, I'd give anything else barely a notice. We're all still at the stage of having little information and speculation everywhere's at an all time high and likely will continue until Bioware decides to tantalize us further.