Atakuma wrote...
It's not cartoony enough, if you ask me, and you did.
Modifié par tariq071, 12 janvier 2011 - 01:19 .
I... don't know what to say. I look for things like that naturally, so I don't expect the game to shout at me LOOK OVER HERE. Must be a function of traveling a lot. Always look up.In Exile wrote...
Addai67 wrote...
That video is just the Lake Calenhad area which you have to enter in order to get to the Circle Tower. How could you miss it?
I don't look at the sweeping landscape. You can't see that shot if you use isometric, and if you use OTS, you might just not catch that angle based on how you have the camera. You have to look for shots like that, actively, to get them.Likewise the ceiling of the Ashes temple is featured in the cutscene with Genitivi. If you don't have Genitivi along, you'll still have your companion saying something about being gobsmacked about the beautiful temple. So I'm not understanding your examples. And environment is part of graphics, too.
A remark is not the same as a camera pan, and then the game directly goes away from awe-inspiring scenery like that because of the character focus.
Basically, my point was that DA:O had some great scenery, but the camera actively works against seeing it.
As for the environment being part of graphics - I think it's a far, far less important part as compared to the character models themselves.
Modifié par Solostran85, 12 janvier 2011 - 02:15 .
tariq071 wrote...
I don't think that your main concern should be is it to cartoony or not(although it looks like Darksiders).I can live with TEE oR BG graphics and it doesn't bother me.
There are more important issues that are showing going backward trend:
1) game definitely feels as console game , thus can't be even 1/2 complex like other classic games beforeif it ends up being console game).You gonna have to,most likely, play around with dumb X,Y,A,B junk based on utterly inferior platform requirements type of xbox.
Unfortunately for real gamers ,today's market is caving in to populus that doesn't care about depth but how to faster beat the game and collect absolutely meaningless achievements.That is sad reality that we have to accept it .And no toolset?
2) Why now Signature edition, when we don't have even slightest idea how GP will be other then few trailer with consolized H&S combat and word that GP is like pathetic 30ish hours long?Do they need some extra funds(doubt it ) or they trying to capitalize before disclosing real game for some unknown reason?
3) I think you got on wrong forum to say anything even slightly negative about the game, since if you check majority posters can't even spell rogue correctly(rouge..lol),and they mostly caring about ' "oooo loocky pretty graphics"and "ooo how many LI's will look hot." Seriously you expect from someone that hold WoW as challenging game to demand something complex or better?
They may like the game , you may like the game and i may like the game in the end(or opposite) , but i sure won't buy it until i am positive that is not some sort of console low quality RPG pretender, graphics or sans graphics
Hm. Hadn't thought about it that way.Tsai Zhou wrote...
I like both styles, but I also like how the colors of the game represent how the story is being told, as it is being told by a narattor and not in the now, the lack of a realistic look makes sense to me, sort of like the pages in a picture book from the time.
Tsai Zhou wrote...
I like both styles, but I also like how the colors of the game represent how the story is being told, as it is being told by a narattor and not in the now, the lack of a realistic look makes sense to me, sort of like the pages in a picture book from the time.
Tsai Zhou wrote...
I like both styles, but I also like how the colors of the game represent how the story is being told, as it is being told by a narattor and not in the now, the lack of a realistic look makes sense to me, sort of like the pages in a picture book from the time.
errant_knight wrote...
Except that they've said that the style is here to stay and the 'signature' of the series, not unique to the framed narrative. I could suck it up and deal if it was only for one game.
tariq071 wrote...
1) game definitely feels as console game , thus can't be even 1/2 complex like other classic games beforeif it ends up being console game).You gonna have to,most likely, play around with dumb X,Y,A,B junk based on utterly inferior platform requirements type of xbox.
Unfortunately for real gamers ,today's market is caving in to populus that doesn't care about depth but how to faster beat the game and collect absolutely meaningless achievements.That is sad reality that we have to accept it .And no toolset?
Modifié par Jzadek72, 12 janvier 2011 - 04:14 .
is it me or does hawke really look like woods from black ops and the woman the wife of john marston from reddead redemption?GodWood wrote...
oldgodbioware wrote...
I think it looks like that show YU GI OH in art style,and for your other question i hate Japanese role playing games and ainme's,I love japanese culture as im irish and have many japanese friends,but i don't like the cartoony feel to it it just seems to unrealistic to me.
I'm not seeing it.
Modifié par druplesnubb, 12 janvier 2011 - 07:47 .
Retour en haut
