Maria Caliban wrote...
Cutest thing on 4 legs as well!broutefoin wrote...
.... it's very quiet here...
MERRILL! cutest thing on 2 legs. /discuss
I dunno... Schmooples was pretty darn cute.
Maria Caliban wrote...
Cutest thing on 4 legs as well!broutefoin wrote...
.... it's very quiet here...
MERRILL! cutest thing on 2 legs. /discuss
bleetman wrote...
Tigerking wrote...
Not to
mention the aforementioned part of the arguement about how she clearly
knows what she's doing in terms of blood magic and dealing with
Audacity.
There is unfortunately a difference between
knowing, and thinking you know. I doubt she'd consider herself
susceptible to Wryme either.
Modifié par broutefoin, 09 mai 2011 - 04:43 .
broutefoin wrote...
i still don't think treating her like a child by keeping the potentially dangerous thing out of her reach is an appropriate answer.
Yeah, that is the one exception. I see that IC as unique circumstances due to the whole being in Feynriel's weird sleeper-Fade-head-thing, and OOC as the writers trying to clumsily establish how much of a BAMF Hawke is, because all his companions are shown to be corruptible, but Hawke isn't, CAUSE HAWKE IS THAT AWESOME. In my opinion, that encounter doesn't really prove anything. Not saying anyone else is wrong, but that's just how I view it. It just didn't ring true.bleetman wrote...
Tigerking wrote...
Not to mention the aforementioned part of the arguement about how she clearly knows what she's doing in terms of blood magic and dealing with Audacity.
There is unfortunately a difference between knowing, and thinking you know. I doubt she'd consider herself susceptible to Wryme either.
Modifié par Tigerking, 09 mai 2011 - 04:59 .
Tigerking wrote...
I'd love it if one quest (after rivalling Merrill) involved Hawke needing Merrill's help with another dangerous runaround, and she ends up saying no and giving a lecture about how she cares about Hawke, but just wants to protect Hawke from him/herself. Judging by how much mortal danger Hawke gets into on a regular basis, this would be a pretty good argument to make...
Modifié par broutefoin, 09 mai 2011 - 05:06 .
Modifié par Esbatty, 09 mai 2011 - 05:22 .
Join the club man!Daveros wrote...
Well that makes sense, then.
I like her. She's cute.
Modifié par Tigerking, 09 mai 2011 - 05:30 .
Esbatty wrote...
I like how in LotSB and DA2 how the companions now are starting to show more than a little concern for the PC. I'm tired of asking everyone else how they are doin'/holdin' up and NO ONE asking the PC how they feel. Thats why I especially appreciate Merrill's consoling moments in private.
Merrill had me at "dorf felas".
ishmaeltheforsaken wrote...
No, you don't have to select it. It's a special option that's only available in a romance, but it's not required to continue said romance.
Esbatty wrote...
Merrill had me at "dorf felas".
Herr Uhl wrote...
Esbatty wrote...
Merrill had me at "dorf felas".
I can't help but think that it actually means "dwarf fellows".
It means "slow" and "gray" in the Elven. But the way she says it... *puddle*Herr Uhl wrote...
Esbatty wrote...
Merrill had me at "dorf felas".
I can't help but think that it actually means "dwarf fellows".
ishmaeltheforsaken wrote...
Maria Caliban wrote...
Cutest thing on 4 legs as well!broutefoin wrote...
.... it's very quiet here...
MERRILL! cutest thing on 2 legs. /discuss
I dunno... Schmooples was pretty darn cute.
broutefoin wrote...
its arrogant and selfish
Modifié par bleetman, 09 mai 2011 - 02:33 .
Actually, that's the real reason behind Leliana's attitude change towards the mages.Beerfish wrote...
Schmooples didn't make it, a casualty of the battle of the squealing plains and the real reason that Leliana (aka secret agent Nightingale) comes to Kirkwall, to look for long lost Schmooples.
Modifié par tmp7704, 09 mai 2011 - 02:34 .