273 réponses à ce sujet

[Pwner1323]

Lunatic LK47 wrote...

Pwner1323 wrote...

shinobi602 wrote...

Pwner1323 wrote...

Are you a developer?

NO

No, but I do apply common sense.

That's like a monkey trying to use a computer. You don't know how far in development they are and if it can be done. So please, with all due respect, stop talking out of you're ass.

With all due respect, STOP TALKING OUT OF *YOUR* ASS!

Im not the one making stuff up from nowhere.

Modifié par Pwner1323, 11 janvier 2011 - 09:32 .

[Kronner]

Pwner1323 wrote...

Kronner wrote...

No ****ing way!

STOP CURSING ALREADY!

If you people are right then why use such language? Saying just NO would be enough.

star star star star -ing is cursing? lol

[shinobi602]

Pwner1323 wrote...

That's like a monkey trying to use a computer. You don't know how far in development they are and if it can be done. So please, with all due respect, stop talking out of you're ass.

I find it ironic how you tell others to reply maturely, given your responses so far.

[DTKT]

Two different teams maybe? Even, two different studios?

[Pwner1323]

Kronner wrote...

Pwner1323 wrote...

Kronner wrote...

No ****ing way!

STOP CURSING ALREADY!

If you people are right then why use such language? Saying just NO would be enough.

star star star star -ing is cursing? lol

Smartass

[Pwner1323]

DTKT wrote...

Two different teams maybe? Even, two different studios?

Like the team developing Dead Space? Yeah, that will end well......

[Merci357]

No.

I wouldn't mind a ME spin off with multiplayer, I guess this could work just fine. But, please not in the last part of a trilogy.

[Lunatic LK47]

Pwner1323 wrote...

DTKT wrote...

Two different teams maybe? Even, two different studios?

Like the team developing Dead Space? Yeah, that will end well......

Add Medal of Honor to the list. We know how well that went.

[Aglazzboi]

shinobi602 wrote...

Pwner1323 wrote...

That's like a monkey trying to use a computer. You don't know how far in development they are and if it can be done. So please, with all due respect, stop talking out of you're ass.

I find it ironic how you tell others to reply maturely, given your responses so far.

This. We need a thread lock really this is kinda getting out of hand

[shinobi602]

Aglazzboi wrote...

This. We need a thread lock really this is kinda getting out of hand

No, we don't need a thread lock due to one person. That's not fair.

[Pwner1323]

Aglazzboi wrote...

shinobi602 wrote...

Pwner1323 wrote...

That's like a monkey trying to use a computer. You don't know how far in development they are and if it can be done. So please, with all due respect, stop talking out of you're ass.

I find it ironic how you tell others to reply maturely, given your responses so far.

This. We need a thread lock really this is kinda getting out of hand

[Metalunatic]

shinobi602 wrote...

Hmm....

6% Yes

94% No


Lol

Yes, very unexpected.

[DTKT]

The issue with MOH wasnt that an other team did it. Its that the other team BADLY did it. Give it to a competent studio with the right team and you might have a good product. A bad designer with bad ideas and concepts in a great studio will still create a bad game.

[Aglazzboi]

shinobi602 wrote...

Aglazzboi wrote...

This. We need a thread lock really this is kinda getting out of hand

No, we don't need a thread lock due to one person. That's not fair.

I know, im just not in the mood today for any type of nonsense. My bad

[Khayness]

Aglazzboi wrote...

I know, im just not in the mood today for any type of nonsense. My bad

It's not you.

[JRCHOharry]

Multiplayer is sooooo 2007.

[Pwner1323]

Metalunatic wrote...

shinobi602 wrote...

Hmm....

6% Yes

94% No


Lol

Yes, very unexpected.

Im assuming that I am the 6% on this thread then......

Modifié par Pwner1323, 11 janvier 2011 - 09:45 .

[C9316]

This is the end of the trilogy. In my opinion the focus on an epic story and singleplayer should be increased.

[CoffeeGamer]

No. They must spend more time in story.

[Unkei]

kill_switch_423 wrote...

Should have an option to vote "Co-op Only", but I went with "Maybe."

This.

[Fortlowe]

I like multiplayer shooters. By a large margin, Call of Duty gets the most amount of spin on my 360. However, my first and true love will always be single player adventure/rpg games. I don't know if ME3 is going to be the end of the series, but I'm hoping it's not and if it isn't, I don't know if I completly support mutliplayer for Mass Effect.
Halo is a good example of why I hesitate to vote for multiplayer in Mass Effect. Halo has a very deep narrative. It was only really hinted at in the first game; just enough to wet the appetite. Thing was, the most popular feature of the game turned out to be the multiplayer LAN support. So when the sequel comes out, the narrative is fleshed out a great deal more, but then so was the multiplayer component. Again the multiplayer was the most popular part of the game. Then third game. The campaign, by then, was whittled down to an well polished afterthought. The multiplayer became the real show.
I have a real fear something like this will happen to Mass Effect if multiplayer is introduced. Bioware made a quantum leap in shooting mechanics between ME1 and ME2. I imagine similar progress will be made between ME2 and ME3. In terms of gameplay quality, that would put ME3's shooting mechanics in the relm of a mainstream online multiplayer shooter. I doubt Bioware will be pleased with just being in the relm, though. Likely this games shooting could could surpass that of other online shooters like Gears of war and Red Dead Redemption. If that is the case, people will understandably gravitate towards the multiplayer, and begin to ignore the campaign. There will be very little incentive in providing a campaign of the depth that the previous titles enjoyed (particularly in a game as deep as Mass Effect) for any future titles, if the title becomes ubiquitous with multiplayer shooting.

That's not necessarily a completely horrible thing. As I said, I really like shooters and I think a Mass Effect multiplayer shooter would be cool. In a perfect world, we could have the best of both. One Mass Effect title that is in the vein of the previous titles. Then another downloadable title that is strictly multiplayer. Maybe even allowing for importing a customized Shepard from the campaign to the multiplayer. And in the other direction, weapons unlocked in the multiplayer could be imported to the campaign. Synergy.

Of course this could all be packaged in the same box, and it would be a greater value to the consumer that way, too, but there it would inevitably lead to the previously stated 'Halo' scenario. There's only so much space on a disc. If mutliplayer were downloadable, the campaign would not be fighting for space.

[Sammuthegreat]

75% say no. Pretty clear indication of how popular it'll be if and when BioWare (read: EA) announce that multiplayer's in...

[Black-Xero]

No,not at all.I want Bioware to focus only on the single player experience and not stray away to work on any sort of multiplayer modes.

[Xero Striker]

I think a multiplayer component to Mass Effect will not hurt. In all honesty, multiplayer, if done right, can help a game massively. A game franchise like Mass Effect is not a multiplayer game in the first place because the story revolves around one man/woman taking on an entire galaxy and multiplayer would break that experience.



Putting that aside how ever, I believe for ME3 there should be some sort of multiplayer because then it would give players a better chance to interact with each other and most games that did well as a single player standalone and recieved multiplayer options afterwards did quite well. Uncharted 2: Among Thieves is a great example; great campaign and great multiplayer, thus giving it the best of both worlds.



Mass Effect is a series that can do all of this, and I would like to see some sort of multiplayer component in order to connect all of our galaxies into one.