Saibh wrote...
If it was optional, and this is your issue, yeah, it's illogical. You're make wild assumptions about things the developers might include, and what you think the players might do with what they don't. Which they can't.
Ok ok only this one more nagging thing...it being optional isn't my issue (like wtf?). It's people wanting this in general, thinking it might improve the game. And wild assuptions? OK silly me for not being able to prevent myself from assuming that people actually like to twist game features around and find funny little glitches which they immediately post on YouTube. Maybe I don't trust the general public then, but can you honestly blame me? The thing is that, why put the children in the game and then bottle neck their impact to prevent any kind of mistreatment? Wouldn't it be easier to just leave them out to begin with?
This whole thing wasn't about me, myself and I. It's about the general public. Seems more like you just wanting to paint me out as a sexist. It's hard to explain my true, complete views about this without writing the whole damn page full of text, every variation, every reaction, every different situation. The thing is that, in order to make this game feature realistic and valid, Bioware would have to write mountains of story text, add an insane amount of variations and after that, also be able to dodge misbehavior and exploit.
Easier to just stick to the epilogue.





Retour en haut




