241 réponses à ce sujet

[mackjr1234]

This man is wise. I think having a bunch of shepards running around in ME3 multiplayer would be dumb, but what if you could have Co-Op against AI. A long-term Co-Op campaign would be cool. Just think about it, instead of saying GTFO N00B whenever anyone even tries to nicely explain why multiplayer could be implemented.

[matt-bassist]

multiplayer is primarily for children. i mean its mostly kids who play them. hence the immaturity that accompanies fps games like Modern Warfare. its actually embarrassing playing against these kids, they rage and swear constantly. so i will be quite glad for a mature company like Bioware to avoid it altogether for ME3. i dont mind them developing something after, but for now i would like it to remain faithful. also, Mass Effect is a mature series, so its not really intended for the MW multiplayer types anyway. im sure a large percentage of them get really BORED playing ME1 and 2 when you have to TALK to people instead of just shooting at them like they're used to.

[Lumikki]

There is no over reaction. I DON'T WANT MP feature in ME3.

ME3 is last game in the Shepards single player game story. If after that Bioware wants to make MP game about Mass Effect universe. Fine by me, even if I would not buy it. Because multiplayer games doesn't interest me at all, I played multible mmorpgs over 9 years, got enough of it.

I don't want Bioware waste they resources to something what have ZERO value for me.

So, my vote is NO for MP in ME3.

Modifié par Lumikki, 15 janvier 2011 - 09:14 .

[TheNexus]

The real reason we don't want multiplayer is because it is a terrible idea.

[Lumikki]

TheNexus wrote...

The real reason we don't want multiplayer is because it is a terrible idea.

It's not bad idea in generally, but it's bad idea for game like Mass Effect single players has been. Mostly because Mass Effect was not design to be FULLY team gameplay. This would mean hole focus and game design would need to be changes. So, it's not just add MP feature, it's alot more complex than that. Mass Effect series game content is design from single players perspective, not from MP's.

[TheNexus]

Lumikki wrote...

It's not bad idea in generally, but it's bad idea for game like Mass Effect single players has been. Mostly because Mass Effect was not design to be FULLY team gameplay. This would mean hole focus and game design would need to be changes. So, it's not just add MP feature, it's alot more complex than that. Mass Effect series game content is design from single players perspective, not from MP's.

And just the fact that trying to add MP to ME3 and thinking it won't hurt the power of how the story is told either through allocation of resources or time is ridiculous.

Mass Effect was never designed for any sort of team gameplay. It's one player who loosely controls two other AIs.

[Code_R]

Why are there so many of these threads? Do so many people just not see the fact that... if say Bioware has 18 months to get this finished to full grade AAA quality and then 4 months are taken away from the that to develop a multiplayer aspect purely to get sales from a wider market that it would detract from the end product of ME3's campaign and story? Is this just a totally crazy idea? Because these threads still keep appearing. Where is the point in a "fun" online shoot em up that doesn't fit properly with the gameplay and bleeds away development time from what actually matters?

Modifié par Code_R, 20 janvier 2011 - 09:45 .

[Code_R]

I'm still typing, but thanks for pointing out my incredible flaw Adolf.

[Someone With Mass]

Well, one reason is that most of the powers and class abilities weren't made for multiplayer.



Co-op at best. That's all I can take.

[Code_R]

Co-op, deathmatch, same issue. Time and money have to be sliced up; there are budgets and deadlines involved.

[GeckoWacko]

Multiplayer as in COop would fit this game better/best I think.

Modifié par GeckoWacko, 20 janvier 2011 - 09:51 .

[GeckoWacko]

mangeo wrote...

Why "ARE" there so many of these threads.....
Why "ARE"....
"ARE"

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRREEEEEEEE You'd be spilling guts from me sword matey.

[Khayness]

mangeo wrote...

Because it will kill the series all together...................if it can die anymore than it already has...

There was absolutely no reason to bring this thread back.

Also, lay down the coffee.

[D.Sharrah]

Anybody mention Assassin's Creed Brotherhood? I know that it isn't exactly an RPG, but a good example of a franchise that introduced MP element into a SP in a well thought out way...still didn't play it myself, but didn't feel as if the SP story suffered because of its inclusion.

Don't know if I am excited about a developer taking potential resources away from the SP game...not sure if I want it as a spin-off either - probably the same reason I am on the fence so much with The Old Republic. Would rather have great SP game expierences with no compromises.

Modifié par D.Sharrah, 20 janvier 2011 - 10:05 .

[Gladegunner]

There is a way to add a multiplayer, but if it does, it will be CCP (computer controlled players) against AI. For anyone who has plaed MW2's special ops, I propose "Spectre Ops" (tehehe). Anyway each player would pick a race, which would determine their decidable armor/costumes as well as skillsets, e.g., Salarian -pure tech, combat tech, Asari -pure biotics, combat biotics, Human, all. Specifically, no one would be Shepard, but they would be on the same level as Shepard because they would all be Spectres. And everyone can get revived (instead of just your teammates dying to be propped up). It would effectively be like playing ME1 or ME2, but your teammates will be on par with you, and can be less submissive. Compromise.

[KainrycKarr]

Nothing about CoD should be compared to a Mass Effect game.



And to my understanding, Assassin's Creed Brotherhood wound up considerably shorter.

[Faerlyte]

I remember back in the day when Co-op multiplayer just meant that someone else could pick up a controller on your system and play with you. Back then it was an incentive because it meant that my brother and I could play together. Those were the days...

Since when was multiplayer primarily for children? I play Halo Reach online frequently, and I've probably encountered...8 kids? 5? Even less so on Gears of War, so I don't know where you get that idea, unless you're just firing salvos at the people who enjoy playing online games. There are plenty of obnoxious "adults" online, but for the most part I've encountered a lot of easy going people that were generally fun to play with. Good online MP can be highly addictive and fun if you've got the right people to play with, which, with some patience, you can find.

Personally, the idea for Online MP in the ME Universe has loads of potential with all the many alien characters and personalization available, but in ME3? No, I'd rather not. It would be better to design an entirely separate game for the purpose of online MP, which might be good or bad, depending on how much effort they put into it.

I'd just assume the trilogy end using the same basic formula of the previous two games for continuity's sake.

Modifié par Faerlyte, 20 janvier 2011 - 11:04 .

[Eldareus]

Don't we have enough MMO's and MP FPS games to satisify the fans of multiplayer type games. While I have enjoyed the social apects and PVP action of WOW and Warhammer what I really enjoy the most is getting lost in a storyline that revolves my character and my actions with a definate conclusion to end the story. In a MMOs your just a cog in an never ending story packed with endless amounts kill X or retrieve Y type grind quests. After a while the MMO becomes a chore for your inevitable quest to obtain better gear for your toon.



To me the game market is already saturated with enough multiplayer games for players to virtually kill one another and not enough single player story driven games.

[Valo_Soren]

1. The multiplayer component won't have anything to do with Shepard. I have heard some rumors that there will be two sides, there will be possible reaper forces or geth of some kind and the freedom fighters in London that are shown in the Mass Effect 3 announcement trailer. You won't be shepard, you'll be choosing a specific class/gender as one of the freedom fighters or as one of the reaper forces, geth, collector, whatever they will introduce as reaper lackeys.

2. Bioware won't ruin the single player campaign, It will be just as good as the mass effect 1 and 2 campaigns, the mulitiplayer will be something else entirely as I stated above and won't even involve Shepard.

3. In all likelihood there won't even be any co-op in the single player campaign, that would just be idiotic and I'm sure bioware knows that. But even if for some reason there is there is still the option to play the single player campaign by yourself regardless.

Modifié par Valo_Soren, 21 janvier 2011 - 01:38 .

[Kusy]

I do want multiplayer in ME3 /trollface.