>>Cut the snarky attitude, for one<<
No ..? No. Rather, work at taking yourself less seriously - stress is a proven factor in reducing your longevity.
Seriously, though, apparently you and I have a difference of opinion in what makes for good roleplay. Me, I'd rather actually focus on the ability to ... well ... roleplay, while you seem to feel only absolute control and freedom are your gateway to roleplay happiness. I can't say you're wrong - as I can't tell you what you like, or that chocolate is superior to vanilla (though it totally is) - but I can tell you that fixating on minor details like clothing to the detriment of the rest of the story will reduce your enjoyment of the game disproportionately.
Is there any full body pics of FemHawke
Débuté par
LURadio
, janv. 14 2011 09:17
Retour en haut
#127
Posté 16 janvier 2011 - 09:45
Addai
-
- Members
- 25 848 messages
Right. Guess that's about enough of this "discussion."elearon1 wrote...
>>Cut the snarky attitude, for one
No ..? No. Rather, work at taking yourself less seriously - stress is a proven factor in reducing your longevity.
Seriously, though, apparently you and I have a difference of opinion in what makes for good roleplay. Me, I'd rather actually focus on the ability to ... well ... roleplay, while you seem to feel only absolute control and freedom are your gateway to roleplay happiness. I can't say you're wrong - as I can't tell you what you like, or that chocolate is superior to vanilla (though it totally is) - but I can tell you that fixating on minor details like clothing to the detriment of the rest of the story will reduce your enjoyment of the game disproportionately.
#129
Posté 18 janvier 2011 - 01:11
wulfsturm
-
- Members
- 2 901 messages
koshindan wrote...
This feels right somehow.
You need to brush up on your facial hair drawing skills, son. That looks less like hair and more like an abherant growth on her face.
#130
Posté 18 janvier 2011 - 03:53
Eveangaline
-
- Members
- 5 990 messages
David Gaider wrote...
LPPrince wrote...
Still, bummer.
Bummerization is, I'm told, our specialty.
Dang, when I heard that, I'd originally assumed that to mean you were experts at programing great buns on your characters. I was imagining Varric and Fenris and the male mage were going to have spectacular bums thanks to your specialty.
Now I'm bummed out about this bums bummer.
#131
Posté 01 mars 2011 - 11:18
Achaewa
-
- Members
- 258 messages
wulfsturm wrote...
koshindan wrote...
This feels right somehow.
You need to brush up on your facial hair drawing skills, son. That looks less like hair and more like an abherant growth on her face.
Looks like some black mutant Hanar has attached itself to femhawke:sick:
#132
Posté 01 mars 2011 - 11:23
Nimpe
-
- Members
- 2 006 messages
Am I the only one interpreting this as asking for nude pictures?
Even worse, this was above a thread about flemeth, and I read Flemeth instead of femhawke.
Even worse, this was above a thread about flemeth, and I read Flemeth instead of femhawke.
Modifié par Nimpe, 01 mars 2011 - 11:24 .
#133
Posté 02 mars 2011 - 05:18
arjay2813
-
- Members
- 98 messages
David Gaider wrote...
Massman123 wrote...
Hmmmm this looks just like DAO's old inventory system. Does this mean we'll be able to change our party members' inventory too?
You can change their weapon, so long as it's a type they use (you can give Aveline 1-handed swords and shields, for instance, but not 2-handed swords). You can also equip them with things like amulets, belts, rings, etc. The only thing you cannot do is change their armor-- you can only upgrade their existing armor.
if you upgrade at some point, and they're armor changes, do the upgrades go back into you're inventory, stay on they're better armor, or will it be lost forever?
