slimgrin wrote...
MerinTB wrote...
slimgrin wrote...
MerinTB wtf are you smoking? TW2 looks so much better its not even close. Ugh...never mind. I've ran into a wall here...
I'm smoking the "so sick of hearing people preach about Witcher stuff" drug that puts a haze of hatred over anything to do with the game.
It's an unfair situation to the game, sure, but the Talimancer haters can understand the sentiment.
So, again to be fair, I'm so not interested in TW2 that I'm not an objective observer.
Bias noted - no, I don't think TW2 screens that have been shown to me constantly are impressive. *shrug*
Well at least you admit your bias. I'd have to be blind not to accept that The Witcher 2 had better graphics than DA2, or that Crysis 2 had better graphics than both. Such is the curse of objectivity, I suppose.
I hate to play this card but -
what you do MEAN by "better" graphics? Is there some objective scale to measure against? Aren't whether graphics are better or worse, ultimately, up to the eye of the beholder?
Is cubism worse than a photo because it isn't "real looking" or has less DPI?
I think it's mostly a matter of taste. Does TW2 utilize more of an advanced graphics card's functions than DA2? That may be possible, but it still doesn't make it objectively "better" just more technologically demanding. *shrug*
I don't think TW2 looks better than DA2.
And, further bias noted - I'm absolutely NOT a fan of the art style of DA2, so... take that for what you will.