please, with so much relativism you shoot yourself in the foot right there. how can you keep a discssion when you say thatParis can be somewhere between north and south poles?
Rankings and comparisons exist for a reason and game, so called, journalists make them an important part of the gaming community.
But you have to make sure what you are comparing is the same thing. Yes TW2 has better technical graphics(higher pixel count), but the artwork/design of the graphics are very subjective and largely based on taste. He siaid nothing that "shot him in the foot", you just happened to not like what he said. Comparison are their to give clarity to a description, not to confuse an issue.
The graphics are, imo, not any better then DA2 except in the amount of pixels used, imo. Jet Set Radio Future or Ogre Battle 64, imo, has the best graphics on a console I have seen and they are not hardware intensive, but the design and style are awesome.
One can say that if one artstyle is preferable (chosen by majority) it is superior, right?
The only part of the game that a line of thought like that is true is if we are talking purely mechanical in graphics. Other then that, you can't quantify something that is not quantifiable.
On the other hand you can say its for the massess, its mainstream crap! Ho would you describe DA2 then? Huh? Is it that good coz most of RPG fans will choose it (or not) a rpg GOTY? Or is it that GOTY is a proof of its mainstreamisation?
What does any of that have to do with his post? Graphics are extremely subjective in near everything but the mechanics of it(pixels/resolutions/ect). It does not matter how many people like one look over the other, you can not claim as fact that one is superior to the other with something based completely on subjectiveness and opinion. Unless you are talking pure mechanical prowess.





Retour en haut










