In Exile wrote...
Omnicrat wrote...
Do we
really know Quarian life spans? Couldn't they be 60 years on a good
day? So, if they do have a short life-span, figuring a generation once
every 20 years or so... they have been in space for around 15
generations. Thats enough to have afew hundred deffective immune
systems in the first generation trickle down to the rest by now.
You can't just knock out the immune system like that.
ME isn't even clear on what immune problem they have. ME2 acts like
they have severe allergies, but they speak about nonsence
like "boosting your immune system with antibiotics" which only works
against specific bacterial infections. It's all 100% nonsence.
Our species has lots of pretty bad auto-immune problems. But we can control them with medication. Auto-immune problems are nothing
like what ME portrays them as. It isn't a weak immune system, but
rather a retard immune system that attacks the body's own cellular
tissue and needs to be artificially suppressed to allow for
functioning. Even then, people are not typically more suscepntible to
infection (well, it varies based on the medication dosage) but
oftentimes what happens is that the actual infection itself is many
times worse.Maybe it was
common for Quarian babies to die from alergic reactions, but the
population quotas and sterile environments made most of those children
survive, becoming the dominant members of the population.
If
there was some hyper allergic trait, natural selection would either
clear it out or (more reasonably) quarians would have put their
children in suits earlier. Their enviro-suit is not magic technology
they invented in outer-space. Think about it this way: if all these
quarians keep dying from the trait, the trait would breed out. The only
exception is if you were a carrier. But at that point, you could just
screen genetically for the disorder.
But having no quarians in suits at the time of their exodus => all quarians in suits today is, well, just magic.Maybe
there was a genetic defect caused by being nearly continually affected
by a mass effect field (the gravity) from the moment one is born.
Well,
okay, but then adaptation is 100% impossible. There would be no
non-affected quarian stock in existence. All quarians would carry a
mutation that would make their immune systems worthless. Even if they
go back to their homeworld, they'd never be able to remove their suits.Maybe they "evolutionary" change
was minimal and the Quarians current state is due to none of their
young getting the chance to test their immune systems against any
environment.
That would be simple to cure - raise
your young in contaminated environments. But that's not actually what
ME2 says. They specifically talk about children ''relying'' on their
mother's immune system when they are in the bubble.Maybe
the original explination made sense, but through re-writes in the story
of ME1, they had to change the dates or reason for the suits.
No, the original explanation was still stupid.Maybe
someone at bioware just liked the idea of suit people with bad immune
systems so they put it in a game and tried to haphazardly explain it
later.
Probably. I'm just saying trying to reason out what the quarians did is incoherent thanks to all the Bad Science .
I'm new here and I don't get this quote program, so I'll just number off my responses
1) Quarian bilogogy in nothing like ours for two reasons. a) different kind of DNA
2a) In this hypothesis, I mean to sugest that it was a common mutation that could not be cured (something like a more common, less evil Ardat-Yaksh [sp?]) and, with a desire to preserve as many quarian as possible, they incorperated this sensitive trait into the genome. Working at low-level exposures to the environment of the homeworld would allow certain quarians to survive their original environment within a lifetime, infant mortality would skyrocket, but with aproximatly 7,000,000 baby maker minimum, the population would stabilize and begin to grow befor the problem became accute.
2b) I do not recall, but does it say the suits were invented in space or simply their current roll in quarian culture? Is it not possible there was a small chunk of the population confined to suits, or that new colonists used a mix of suits, clean-rooms, and low-level environmental exposures to acclimate to new environments?
3) If the advratisments on Illium are to be trusted, there are ways for quarians/vulus to modify their physiology so that they no longer need there suits. I assume these procedures have high draw-backs aside from the high mortality rates, but I am sure some low-level gene therapy could be implemented in-eutero (sp?) to slowly bring the quarian immune system back to what it once was.
4) Yeah... this hyposesis is not salvagable...
5) I meant some explanation we never saw that one writer thought up but it contradicted a main plot point or some such, so either the quarians had to be scraped or re-writen.
6) Even though this probably was it, I still find it enjoyable (sp) to come up with plausable explanations. Who know, a writer might see something he likes and re-con it in.
edit: hit the wrong quote button... hehehe...
Modifié par Omnicrat, 15 janvier 2011 - 08:39 .





Retour en haut






