desonnac00 wrote...
Scientifically, the Lazarus project IS SOUND!
Check it people. No, it isn't explained well, but IT IS POSSIBLE.
A human being is like a computer. Within our DNA is the memory of every single ancestor- that includes EVERYTHING. Facial stricture, memories, hair color, how to talk, walk, etc. That memory is the hard drive. It is NOT power dependant. OUR memories. The one we acquire SINCE BIRTH are RAM. They ARE power dependant. Shut down the power- it's gone. BUT the body also copies the RAM on to the hard drive. That's why people with amnesia sometimes recover memories of their entire life BEFORE the trauma that got them. Having Just a piece of Sheps body IS ENOUGH to reconstruct him/her. In present day, such tech to read DNA efectively is not available, but the science behind it IS SOUND. Unfortunetly, Bioware doesn't bother much with science in this sci-fi epic, but the fundamental principal is not outrageous. People who say: But how did Sheps brain survive- It DIDN'T and it didn't have to.
To anyone who want to debunk me- This is still a more or less radical idea in modern day science and I do realise it sounds ridiculous to some/most of you, but again- The basic principle is SOUND.
After reading the DNA, It's just a matter of "building" Shep. Yes, you need tech to to remake the brain, synaptic pathways, essentially WRITE his/her memories once more with would be a rather traumatic expirience but bottom line- possible- yes. Easy- NO, but possible- yes.
This is impossible based on our current understanding of genetics. Overlooking the many other reasons why this is wrong I'm not sure how to explain, I'll go with the ones I can explain.
1) To store ones "specieal memory" in DNA, the amount of DNA would need to increase greatly in each generation. This does not happen. It would mean insainly large genetic structures and it would not be possible for people from different generations to breed.
2) To store ones own memory in DNA, they would either add DNA in some fasion (while they sleep, continually, Idk) or modify a large pre-set section of DNA (if this happened [which it doesn't] it could potentally work [if it treated the non-sensical combination of parental genetic memory as unreadable]).
Neither of these happen. We know for a fact neither of these happen. To call it scientific in any way, shape, or form is... grotesquly misinformed, at best. I'm sure someone probably alread made a post like this, but I felt
an obligation a cumpulsion to write it up myself.