Aller au contenu

Photo

aliens in ME are basically humans


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
87 réponses à ce sujet

#26
Archontor

Archontor
  • Members
  • 636 messages

Vaenier wrote...

You could also argue they are all like Humans because of convergent evolution. The human way of thinking was most beneficial to survival and advancement, and thus other planets ended up evolving to it on their own, or something like that. Its just an idea.


seems pretty sensible to me

#27
rokeeb

rokeeb
  • Members
  • 429 messages

Vaenier wrote...

You could also argue they are all like Humans because of convergent evolution. The human way of thinking was most beneficial to survival and advancement, and thus other planets ended up evolving to it on their own, or something like that. Its just an idea.


Pfft, your scientific mumbo-jumbo is non-sense.

We're simply all God's social experiment. He made all the different species and then didn't tell us about each other to see what we would do. Isn't it obvious?

#28
lovgreno

lovgreno
  • Members
  • 3 523 messages
This is the kind of science fiction where aliens and humans represent different cultures rather than different spiecies. It's more like our real Earth life political and economical disagreements that often leads to a mess but usualy kind of works somehow anyway. A more realistic, but also rather boring, meeting of different aliens would probably be some very different spiecies staring at eachothers and thinking: "WTF is that thing?!"



So, just enjoy the space opera setting for what it is.

#29
Ieldra

Ieldra
  • Members
  • 25 190 messages

Vaenier wrote...
You could also argue they are all like Humans because of convergent evolution. The human way of thinking was most beneficial to survival and advancement, and thus other planets ended up evolving to it on their own, or something like that. Its just an idea.

Yes, but that only goes so far. Basically, it explains a humanoid general morphology, and possibly some aspects of social behaviour. But:

(1) If you can intuitively read an alien's body language, then it's too human for "convergent evolution" to explain.
(2) If an alien appears sexually attractive to a standard human, likewise.

These traits depend on co-evolution, they develop only in interaction between individuals, while you can justify "general humanoid appearance" by environmental factors. So plainly the asari are the worst offenders, followed by the batarians and the quarians. Even the turians and the volus have human-readable body language - recall how you can read how tired Garrus is when you meet him first? That shouldn't happen with aliens, humanoid or not.

#30
brgillespie

brgillespie
  • Members
  • 354 messages
Even if Mass Effect aliens looked like piles of steaming poo with eye-stalks, there'd be lonely gamers around here that'd be complaining about their Shepard not being able to stick his weewee into the doo-doo alien. Oh, and that their male/female Shepard couldn't engage in xenohomosexual acts with the male/female poo-poo alien.

#31
Vaenier

Vaenier
  • Members
  • 2 815 messages

Ieldra2 wrote...

Yes, but that only goes so far. Basically, it explains a humanoid general morphology, and possibly some aspects of social behaviour. But:

(1) If you can intuitively read an alien's body language, then it's too human for "convergent evolution" to explain.
(2) If an alien appears sexually attractive to a standard human, likewise.

These traits depend on co-evolution, they develop only in interaction between individuals, while you can justify "general humanoid appearance" by environmental factors. So plainly the asari are the worst offenders, followed by the batarians and the quarians. Even the turians and the volus have human-readable body language - recall how you can read how tired Garrus is when you meet him first? That shouldn't happen with aliens, humanoid or not.

1. Maybe. Maybe the translator translates body language? :P
2. No. Humans are already attracted to animal and alien forms.

#32
Dean_the_Young

Dean_the_Young
  • Members
  • 20 684 messages

Archontor wrote...

rokeeb wrote...

Dean_the_Young wrote...

Krogan are the most alien aliens in Mass Effect, bar possibly the Rachni and the Reapers. If they weren't bipedal, and didn't have Wrex, they'd be great: distinctly non-human, innately different psychology, biology trumping sci fi kumbyyah, and so on.


Wait, Wrex makes the Krogan NOT great?

*faints*


He critisezes Wrex his argument is invalid

I didn't criticize Wrex.

#33
Archontor

Archontor
  • Members
  • 636 messages

Dean_the_Young wrote...

Archontor wrote...

rokeeb wrote...

Dean_the_Young wrote...

Krogan are the most alien aliens in Mass Effect, bar possibly the Rachni and the Reapers. If they weren't bipedal, and didn't have Wrex, they'd be great: distinctly non-human, innately different psychology, biology trumping sci fi kumbyyah, and so on.


Wait, Wrex makes the Krogan NOT great?

*faints*


He critisezes Wrex his argument is invalid

I didn't criticize Wrex.


Iwasn't serious

#34
Dionkey

Dionkey
  • Members
  • 1 334 messages
Well you got to understand that Bipedial, intelligent species are going to be the most successful. If we found monkeys or ants they would probably be way less advanced. I think other than the Asari, ME is a fairly realistic expectation.

#35
Dean_the_Young

Dean_the_Young
  • Members
  • 20 684 messages
...



Bipedal has nothing to do with it. Intelligence, and opposable digits, do.



In fact, bipedal is actually a structurally poor form: physically, humans suck in pretty much every category to everyone else. We just evolved the digits and the brains to develop supperior tools to overcome those weaknesses, but the evolutionary trade-off between biped-with-manipulators only applies to those evolutionary lines that only developed four limbs to work with. Four legs with two arms would be far more stable and effective in many ways.

#36
Dionkey

Dionkey
  • Members
  • 1 334 messages

Dean_the_Young wrote...

...

Bipedal has nothing to do with it. Intelligence, and opposable digits, do.

In fact, bipedal is actually a structurally poor form: physically, humans suck in pretty much every category to everyone else. We just evolved the digits and the brains to develop supperior tools to overcome those weaknesses, but the evolutionary trade-off between biped-with-manipulators only applies to those evolutionary lines that only developed four limbs to work with. Four legs with two arms would be far more stable and effective in many ways.

Building practical items for war,travel and overall enjoyment would be difficult for a four legged species. Now you can have intelligence with it, but you would sacrifice a lot for it to work. Also, if we are talking about centaurs here then sure, but people like the Elcor do not work as well as us, doesn't mean they aren't intelligent.

#37
TheRealIncarnal

TheRealIncarnal
  • Members
  • 475 messages
I figured the Salarians have a higher IQ than Humans on average, possibly the same is true for the Asari, and Turians are barely sentient. The Krogan are very different from us, and I really enjoy that. I'd really like to get to know the Elcor better though, they're a very interesting bunch who are absolutely different from us.

#38
Archontor

Archontor
  • Members
  • 636 messages

Dean_the_Young wrote...

...

Bipedal has nothing to do with it. Intelligence, and opposable digits, do.

In fact, bipedal is actually a structurally poor form: physically, humans suck in pretty much every category to everyone else. We just evolved the digits and the brains to develop supperior tools to overcome those weaknesses, but the evolutionary trade-off between biped-with-manipulators only applies to those evolutionary lines that only developed four limbs to work with. Four legs with two arms would be far more stable and effective in many ways.


it's worse for climbing and straight verical jumps i'd imagine (not suitable for tree living creatures which are the ancestors of the sapient being i know of)  also it makes them inherently larger making them easier to see, harder to hide and harder to maintain never mind i

#39
Archontor

Archontor
  • Members
  • 636 messages

TheRealIncarnal wrote...

I figured the Salarians have a higher IQ than Humans on average, possibly the same is true for the Asari, and Turians are barely sentient. The Krogan are very different from us, and I really enjoy that. I'd really like to get to know the Elcor better though, they're a very interesting bunch who are absolutely different from us.


for 'barely sentient' beings they've acomplished a lot, there's the spectre who raised an army (saren) the mechanic with a (some how) bronx accent (lilitherax) and a lawyer/buisness man  (Loriq quin) and a councilor of the most powerful government imaginable (ok so you've got me there)

#40
Dean_the_Young

Dean_the_Young
  • Members
  • 20 684 messages

Dionkey wrote...

Dean_the_Young wrote...

...

Bipedal has nothing to do with it. Intelligence, and opposable digits, do.

In fact, bipedal is actually a structurally poor form: physically, humans suck in pretty much every category to everyone else. We just evolved the digits and the brains to develop supperior tools to overcome those weaknesses, but the evolutionary trade-off between biped-with-manipulators only applies to those evolutionary lines that only developed four limbs to work with. Four legs with two arms would be far more stable and effective in many ways.

Building practical items for war,travel and overall enjoyment would be difficult for a four legged species. Now you can have intelligence with it, but you would sacrifice a lot for it to work. Also, if we are talking about centaurs here then sure, but people like the Elcor do not work as well as us, doesn't mean they aren't intelligent.

Building bi-pedal designed technology with bi-pedal conceptions about how things should be might be difficult, but they aren't going to be designing houses and stairs and cars comfortable for bi-pedals. They're going to design things comfortable for them.

A four legged species doesn't mean it only has four limbs. That's an evolutionary lock of human mamal biology, and doesn't even hold true across the earth biosphere (where insects and bugs have many more limbs). We can look to Centaurs as a model, or Rachni. Even a bear with better hands and a brain.

The key to successful civilization is brains and manipulators, and less of everything else. The reason the Elcor are poor fighters isn't because they walk on all four limbs, but because the environment in which they evolved was poor and too heavy in gravity (leading to slowness and other limitations).

The reason the Hanar are 'weak' is because they're aquatic by evolution, and because plot-hammering makes building robotic armies not an option.


There is no advantage in 'bipedal' evolution over any other sort, except in so much that on Earth that meant manipulators could evolve. That is not a required tradeoff in any other evolutionary scheme, nor is it even an absolute on Earth: monkeys have better/more manipulators than humans (feet-hands, tales), they just lack comparative intelligence at this time in evolution.

#41
Dean_the_Young

Dean_the_Young
  • Members
  • 20 684 messages

Archontor wrote...

Dean_the_Young wrote...

...

Bipedal has nothing to do with it. Intelligence, and opposable digits, do.

In fact, bipedal is actually a structurally poor form: physically, humans suck in pretty much every category to everyone else. We just evolved the digits and the brains to develop supperior tools to overcome those weaknesses, but the evolutionary trade-off between biped-with-manipulators only applies to those evolutionary lines that only developed four limbs to work with. Four legs with two arms would be far more stable and effective in many ways.


it's worse for climbing and straight verical jumps i'd imagine (not suitable for tree living creatures which are the ancestors of the sapient being i know of)  also it makes them inherently larger making them easier to see, harder to hide and harder to maintain never mind i

The best climbers and jumpers in the world aren't bipedal. Pumas can jump fifteen feet into the air (five times their body height), while fleas can jump a hundred times their body size.

Even monkeys and apes aren't solely bipdeal: as climbers and as movers, they remain in large part quadrapedal, while many species (snakes, bugs, even big cats) remain far more proficient at climbing trees and such than humans.



(Edit: Not a disagreement with you, I think, just an expansion of the point.)

The evolutionary advantage of humans isn't that we're more capable than other animals: by and large we're slower, weaker, and more ungangly than most animals in their evolved habitats.

What humans had the advantage, of, was flexibility in multiple habitats (not as good as any, but better than the rest), and tools.

And mastering fire. All animals, even predators that can maul us, fear fire.

Modifié par Dean_the_Young, 16 janvier 2011 - 03:47 .


#42
ashwind

ashwind
  • Members
  • 3 150 messages
Harbinger: We are nothing like humans and humans can never be anything like us. Grrr the insult of being compared to something that is infinitely insignificant.



:P

#43
Nhani

Nhani
  • Members
  • 263 messages

Deathwurm wrote...
I believe that this is due to the fact that all Great Fiction is meant to reflect "The Human Condition"...Aliens in Science Fiction are meant to reflect aspects of ourselves...just my Opinion.

Pretty much this; you can leave out the great part and it'll still largely ring true.

With the exception of fiction that tries to take a Cthulian approach to alien entities (ie: being so alien it is unknowable), most sci-fi will construct aliens on human terms to explore various societal aspects in a more fantastic setting - you'll often find fantasy doing very much the same.

Mordin stating that humans have greater variance than other alien species almost seems like a dig at the basic sci-fi formula (that Mass Effect pretty much follows) where alien species are generally constructed out of a few select concepts and archetypes.

#44
Archontor

Archontor
  • Members
  • 636 messages

Dean_the_Young wrote...

Archontor wrote...

Dean_the_Young wrote...

...

Bipedal has nothing to do with it. Intelligence, and opposable digits, do.

In fact, bipedal is actually a structurally poor form: physically, humans suck in pretty much every category to everyone else. We just evolved the digits and the brains to develop supperior tools to overcome those weaknesses, but the evolutionary trade-off between biped-with-manipulators only applies to those evolutionary lines that only developed four limbs to work with. Four legs with two arms would be far more stable and effective in many ways.


it's worse for climbing and straight verical jumps i'd imagine (not suitable for tree living creatures which are the ancestors of the sapient being i know of)  also it makes them inherently larger making them easier to see, harder to hide and harder to maintain never mind i

The best climbers and jumpers in the world aren't bipedal. Pumas can jump fifteen feet into the air (five times their body height), while fleas can jump a hundred times their body size.

Even monkeys and apes aren't solely bipdeal: as climbers and as movers, they remain in large part quadrapedal, while many species (snakes, bugs, even big cats) remain far more proficient at climbing trees and such than humans.



(Edit: Not a disagreement with you, I think, just an expansion of the point.)

The evolutionary advantage of humans isn't that we're more capable than other animals: by and large we're slower, weaker, and more ungangly than most animals in their evolved habitats.

What humans had the advantage, of, was flexibility in multiple habitats (not as good as any, but better than the rest), and tools.

And mastering fire. All animals, even predators that can maul us, fear fire.


terribly sorry i missinterpreted quadrapedal to mean two legged specificaly not anything that uses four limbs to mave the majoraty of the time however must point out that humans have very high levely of endurance, according to tv tropes if we don't exceed walking pace we can go for 2 days without stopping this is partialy due to being bipedal as we have less limbs to move to keep going forward 

#45
Dionkey

Dionkey
  • Members
  • 1 334 messages

Dean_the_Young wrote...

Building bi-pedal designed technology with bi-pedal conceptions about how things should be might be difficult, but they aren't going to be designing houses and stairs and cars comfortable for bi-pedals. They're going to design things comfortable for them.

A four legged species doesn't mean it only has four limbs. That's an evolutionary lock of human mamal biology, and doesn't even hold true across the earth biosphere (where insects and bugs have many more limbs). We can look to Centaurs as a model, or Rachni. Even a bear with better hands and a brain.

The key to successful civilization is brains and manipulators, and less of everything else. The reason the Elcor are poor fighters isn't because they walk on all four limbs, but because the environment in which they evolved was poor and too heavy in gravity (leading to slowness and other limitations).

The reason the Hanar are 'weak' is because they're aquatic by evolution, and because plot-hammering makes building robotic armies not an option.


There is no advantage in 'bipedal' evolution over any other sort, except in so much that on Earth that meant manipulators could evolve. That is not a required tradeoff in any other evolutionary scheme, nor is it even an absolute on Earth: monkeys have better/more manipulators than humans (feet-hands, tales), they just lack comparative intelligence at this time in evolution.

Convincing argument, I was going about it wrong.

#46
Bad King

Bad King
  • Members
  • 3 133 messages

Eddo36 wrote...

I've come to the conclusion that the alien races are psychologically same to humans and with the same average IQ. Same mental behavior, just different body forms. Oddly.

Salarians may talk a bit faster, and asari may have more life experience by living 1000 years, but that's it. Turian honor is only a cultural and not a racial thing.


Agreed. The only aliens that seem different are the Hanar (with their bioluminescence communication). Then again their excessive politeness is a trait carried by a lot of humans.

Modifié par Bad King, 16 janvier 2011 - 04:00 .


#47
88mphSlayer

88mphSlayer
  • Members
  • 2 124 messages

Eddo36 wrote...

I've come to the conclusion that the alien races are psychologically same to humans and with the same average IQ. Same mental behavior, just different body forms. Oddly.

Salarians may talk a bit faster, and asari may have more life experience by living 1000 years, but that's it. Turian honor is only a cultural and not a racial thing.


eh i think they've done more than enough to differentiate everybody else from humans

personalities in some aliens are human-like obviously, tho i think part of that is simply to aid storytelling

and if the Asari/Turians/Volus/Salarians/Krogan are too human-like, there's always the Rachni, Collectors, Reapers, Hanar, and Geth

#48
Dean_the_Young

Dean_the_Young
  • Members
  • 20 684 messages

Archontor wrote...

terribly sorry i missinterpreted quadrapedal to mean two legged specificaly not anything that uses four limbs to mave the majoraty of the time however must point out that humans have very high levely of endurance, according to tv tropes if we don't exceed walking pace we can go for 2 days without stopping this is partialy due to being bipedal as we have less limbs to move to keep going forward 

Archontor, when was the last time you walked two hours without stopping, let alone stayed up two days without any physical exertion?

A human can out-walk a horse, but a horse can still cover a lot more ground a lot faster than a human can. The cases where we out-endure an animal are both rare and not the reason we dominante them evolution-wise.

#49
88mphSlayer

88mphSlayer
  • Members
  • 2 124 messages

Dean_the_Young wrote...

...

Bipedal has nothing to do with it. Intelligence, and opposable digits, do.

In fact, bipedal is actually a structurally poor form: physically, humans suck in pretty much every category to everyone else. We just evolved the digits and the brains to develop supperior tools to overcome those weaknesses, but the evolutionary trade-off between biped-with-manipulators only applies to those evolutionary lines that only developed four limbs to work with. Four legs with two arms would be far more stable and effective in many ways.


bipedal is more adaptable to a social structure tho, and social structures trump physical attributes in terms of species survival/advancement

given that most of Mass Effect 1 and 2 are about space-faring civilizations it's only natural that bi-pedals would be more common

#50
Archontor

Archontor
  • Members
  • 636 messages

Dean_the_Young wrote...

Archontor wrote...

terribly sorry i missinterpreted quadrapedal to mean two legged specificaly not anything that uses four limbs to mave the majoraty of the time however must point out that humans have very high levely of endurance, according to tv tropes if we don't exceed walking pace we can go for 2 days without stopping this is partialy due to being bipedal as we have less limbs to move to keep going forward 

Archontor, when was the last time you walked two hours without stopping, let alone stayed up two days without any physical exertion?

A human can out-walk a horse, but a horse can still cover a lot more ground a lot faster than a human can. The cases where we out-endure an animal are both rare and not the reason we dominante them evolution-wise.


ounce again paraphrasing tv tropes in africa some tribes utilise 'endurance hunting' which is basicaly calmly following a gazell or antelope until it collapses and is theorised to be the oldest hunting method in human history also i should point that another advantage humans have is that for some reason we can resist a large amounts of poisons