Freelancer rook wrote...
No, the end justifies the means.
Here's an end: end human suffering. And here's a means to that end: kill everyone. Can't say it wouldn't work: no more humans, no more human suffering. So, it's justified, no?
Freelancer rook wrote...
No, the end justifies the means.
Guest_kya169_*
Freelancer rook wrote...
No, the end justifies the means.
Inverness Moon wrote...
I'm not arguing against that. What I am saying is that the collectors would have attacked Horizon eventually even if TIM had done nothing. TIM simply lured them in on his own time as part of a trap.Zulu_DFA wrote...
If it happened like you suggest, he'd have learned about the attack when it was already over, just like in every other case. But hell, he even admits his role himself to Shepard at the debriefing after the mission. "Lure them in" is his exact wording.
Dean_the_Young wrote...
Because researching about indoctrination is far secondary to the actual priority of getting an IFF to beat the Collectors, and as quickly as possible.
The Reaper wasn't going anywhere (until Shepard showed up). You can come back to make a dedicated study later.
Why would they have, if they were prepared to accept it going in, and then wouldn't want to once they started being affected? There are a lot of people in this world who will do something they know is liable to get them and those around them killed, and then keep going forward as it happens.
This isn't some hypothetical state that only applies to fanatics: the Civil War and WW1 both demonstrated how common this trait can be.
Better on what grounds? Husks overwhelming the researchers wasn't what brought an end to the project, while shooting themselves at the first signs would have cut their project short if it hadn't succeded yet.
Or it still might be horrendously expensive and unfeasible on any sort of scale.
'Ideally' would only apply if (a) taking people off the project didn't slow down the project, the speed of success of which could affect the Collector Conflict (there's relevant reasons why this research can't be pursued later, at a point at which it wouldn't conflict with anti-Collector efforts. Or, more specifically, 'ideally' would depend on your personal ideals, and priorities.
Indoctrination research isn't the overwhelming priority to Cerberus at this point, and it isn't a limited opportunity as long as this Reaper exists.
Multiple ways. Do you want me to sound like a paternalistic a-hat in spelling it out for you, though?
This little enigmatic genocidal race called the Collectors working for the Reapers.
Not especially after this post: you've returned to your particular habits which generally marks the end of any useful debate between us.
Dean_the_Young wrote...
There's also the minor difference that scuttling a blue water ship fills it with water and sinks it beyond easy reach... while scuttling a space ship in the same manner just fills it with space. Which you sort of already have to be able to travel through to get to the ship in the first place.Moiaussi wrote...
Btw, Dean?
There is a nice (and definately not complete) list of notable scuttled ships here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scuttling
I realize it is just wikipedia, but if you want to dispute any of the examples, go ahead.
Scuttling a space ship of size is far more comparable to scuttling a house of size.
Inverness Moon wrote...
The idea that his eyes might indicate him being something other than human is baseless conjecture. So what are you trying to say? .
That is a very weak base for your argument.
Modifié par Moiaussi, 27 janvier 2011 - 05:57 .
Moiaussi wrote...
Inverness Moon wrote...
The idea that his eyes might indicate him being something other than human is baseless conjecture. So what are you trying to say? .
Umm.. that is all I was really trying to say.That is a very weak base for your argument.
Not when that is the arguement....
Dean_the_Young wrote...]And to get EDI access to those banks, Shepard had to establish an uplink to the Collector Systems. For the same reasons that Shepard has to go back to ther Terminal for EDI to take control of them to get him back down.
No, it's a direct answer to a yes/no question you posed. If you pose an open-ended question, I'll give an open answer. If you pose a closed-ended question, I may give a closed answer.
The difference between scuttling a space ship and scuttling a water ship is... water.
Water does most the damage, and puts the ship beyond most recovery, which is the bigger point. Scuttling a space ship, if it can't be pushed into a gravity well of relevant sort, is more equivalent to scuttling a land building.
Apparently the Turian ships outside the cruiser on the approach scene would beg to differ.
(And wasn't it you who pointed that there were actual Turian ships to me awhile ago?)
To answer your other questions: a Turian vessel would be near Terminus space for the same reason an Alliance vessel was in Batarian space in CDN, and why Chinese subs are in Japanese waters, and why the Russians do flights towards American/Canada airspace.
(IE, lots of reasons political.)
There is no such thing as a modern auto-destruct on a modern warship of comparable size. It's a really, really stupid sci-fi conceit: we don't build our weapons to blow up, because people tend to find ways to press the button.
Pardon given.
Besides the, ahem, minimal chances of a warship fit to carry weapons being overrun and 'captured', you don't need to self-destruct a ship to deny nuclear weapons to the enemy. Most ships of size don't even carry nuclear weapons in the first place, and it's far easier to dud the nuclear weapons themelves (as most modern US nuclear devices are rigged to render themselves inoperable very, very easily).
No, the reasoning TIM uses is that the Collectors could have been made aware of prior knowledge by any number of reasons. Some of which we've even agreed on.
There are differences between someone who's cautious in general and someone who actually knows they're walking into a trap.
But isn't the same true of TIM withholding information regarding Horizon, or pretty much everything else? The second prothean beacon, the reaper hull itself..... He would rather send a single frigate against a Collector 'homeworld' (that is what he says they are looking for, not merely a base, which even as a base it is hardly a given that a single frigate would be enough to take out).But... it does agree with me.
TIM's actions towards the Collector Cruiser are in line and consistent with the behavior of every actor in the Collector Cruiser trap. To single away and malign TIM as exceptionally defunct and ignore everyone else is to ignore the overarching reasons for the problems in the first place: not that clever writering set out to depict TIM as an idiot, but that mediocre writing failed as a whole in the entire scenario.
Zulu_DFA wrote...
So, is TIM a... cool alien? Wow... Where's all the love for him then?
Dean_the_Young wrote...
Moiaussi, our argument has gone on to multiple separate, self-contained branches, and for RL reasons I really shouldn't continue pursuing both.
If you'd like to continue one or the other, I'd be willing, or if you want to accept that we are at a 'going in circles' point, I'll accept that as well with no implication of concession on any side.
Moiaussi wrote...
Zulu_DFA wrote...
So, is TIM a... cool alien? Wow... Where's all the love for him then?
Lol, my actual point was that the image shown to Shepard is always a hologram, so we shouldn't assume anything from it.
Moiaussi wrote...
Lol, my actual point was that the image shown to Shepard is always a hologram, so we shouldn't assume anything from it.
Zulu_DFA wrote...
On here we tend to discuss things from the "third person omniscient" perspective, so I'm astonished you overlook the books, where people do meet TIM in person, and even the ME2 intro, where Miranda visits TIM in his office and the official screenshot of TIM's eyes is taken.
didymos1120 wrote...
Your actual point fails though, because we, the players, are shown TIM directly and not from Shep's POV in all but one instance. Again: look no further than the very first scene of the game.
Moiaussi wrote...
didymos1120 wrote...
Your actual point fails though, because we, the players, are shown TIM directly and not from Shep's POV in all but one instance. Again: look no further than the very first scene of the game.
We know that isn't simply a hologam projected to whereever Miranda is stationed, how?
Modifié par Zulu_DFA, 27 janvier 2011 - 09:30 .
Zulu_DFA wrote...
I thought of this, turst me, when the arguments were "Miranda knows where TIM is, let's go blow him away!". I had to concede that she was indeed physically present in the office (which didn't mean that she knew it's location even then).
Becasue she is not sadnting still. She is moving around, which would mean that she went off focus for TIM, which is not what subordinates are casual to do when talking to bosses.
Anyway, this idea, "TIM is a hologram" is next to retarded, since it wouldn't really change anything. There are the books that are quite clear that he is a real person, and the reader is even made privy of TIM's inner thoughts once in a while.
Going to additional lenghts to mystify Shepard specifically would be OOC for TIM, who treats everybody as expendable chess pieces. Shepard is an important one in his current game, but that's it.
Moiaussi wrote...
didymos1120 wrote...
Your actual point fails though, because we, the players, are shown TIM directly and not from Shep's POV in all but one instance. Again: look no further than the very first scene of the game.
We know that isn't simply a hologam projected to whereever Miranda is stationed, how?
Modifié par didymos1120, 27 janvier 2011 - 09:26 .
Inverness Moon wrote...
Think about what? You're not saying much. The attack on Horizon was going to happen sooner or later without Cerberus involvement. TIM just put them on his schedule and took advantage of that.Moiaussi wrote...
Really.. so if Shepard had arrived after they had done their usual mop up and there was no evidence that they had been there at all, or that it wasn't a Cerberus trick?
Or arrived too soon, and found nothing but an unruly bunch of colonists upset at his being there and wondering what all the fuss was about, and having to wait... how long, exactly?
Think about it.The idea that his eyes might indicate him being something other than human is baseless conjecture. That is a very weak base for your argument.Moiaussi wrote...
Maybe you should re-read my post. The suggestion was that TIM might be something other than strictly human because he has glowing eyes. TIM might be there in person in various scenes in the books, but every time Shepard meets him in game it is as a hologram... unless you are suggesting that TIM was actually tagging along on the Normandy....
As such, the appearance we see in game doesn't have to relate to TIM's actual appearance at all. Doesn't mean it doesn't, just that we are just seeing an image.
So what are you trying to say? Are you suggesting TIM might be a hologram projected into the office, or that the office itself isn't real or what? Neither of those claims are supported by the games or books. It seems like you're coming up with weak arguments to support a weak claim.
Freelancer rook wrote...
No, the end justifies the means.
didymos1120 wrote...
Moiaussi wrote...
didymos1120 wrote...
Your actual point fails though, because we, the players, are shown TIM directly and not from Shep's POV in all but one instance. Again: look no further than the very first scene of the game.
We know that isn't simply a hologam projected to whereever Miranda is stationed, how?
Because holograms have a distinctive, partially transparent look, and often include noise. TIM just looks like any other character that's physically present in a scene. And again: you're still ignoring every other TIM scene in the game in which SHEPARD is the (obvious) hologram and the POV is in TIM's office. The only time he's actually a hologram is the during the base decision at the end, when the POV is with Shepard.
Zulu_DFA wrote...
didymos1120 wrote...
Moiaussi wrote...
didymos1120 wrote...
Your actual point fails though, because we, the players, are shown TIM directly and not from Shep's POV in all but one instance. Again: look no further than the very first scene of the game.
We know that isn't simply a hologam projected to whereever Miranda is stationed, how?
Because holograms have a distinctive, partially transparent look, and often include noise. TIM just looks like any other character that's physically present in a scene. And again: you're still ignoring every other TIM scene in the game in which SHEPARD is the (obvious) hologram and the POV is in TIM's office. The only time he's actually a hologram is the during the base decision at the end, when the POV is with Shepard.
Moreover, during the Epilogue conversation, we are given a short glimpse at Shepard with TIM's own eyes! Not over his shoulder, but from the 1st person perspective! And his vision is clearly augmented, as we can see some kind of frame overlay around Shepard's face. It gave food for all kinds of "TIM is a cyborg!" and "TIM is a husk!" speculations, but it clearly sends the message: TIM's eyes are cybernetically augmented.
If TIM was using some sort a fake hologram of himself to deceive Shepard, why wouldn't he photoshop these eyes away?
Bailyn242 wrote...
Listen to the Horoizon news reports and how the Council and the rest of the Galaxy takes the Alliance's inability to protect their own people was viewed. You could easily argue that TIM's actions did as much political damage to humanity as it cost in lives. Rationalize all you want, Horizon and his later actions with the Collector vessel and derelict Reaper prove his continued failures. His way costs the lives of hundreds of thousands of people. Don't forget, Ferris Fields and New Canton came after Horizon which means that those lives, on top of the 200-300K colonists from Horizon are on his hands. He could have stopped that ship on Horizon. Even if the Alliance and Shepard had to destroy the ship with the colonists aboard they would have saved lives and strengthened Humanity and the Alliance in the Galaxy's eyes.
Modifié par Zulu_DFA, 27 janvier 2011 - 10:16 .