5 réponses à ce sujet

[Augustei]

In Dragon Age Origins upon asking Sten whether or not I can trust him after recruiting him he told me that the Qunari are not a people of false promises and that they never go back on their word.

Ferelden, Orlais, Rivain, The Free Marches, Nevarra, Antiva, The Anderfels.. Pretty much every human nation except The Tevinter Imperium signed The Llomerryn Accord with the Qunari stating they would not invade or attack each other anymore. The Invasion of Kirkwall by the Qunari has broken The Llomerryn Accord. This can only mean that Sten is a LIAR! and the Qunari are LIARS! a people of false promise and lies. With this Metagaming knowledge, in origins you should kill sten in your next plathrough because you cant trust him.

Anyway so why did the Qunari break the Llomerryn Accord when they are supposed to be about Honor and keeping their word.. Not Liars?

Modifié par XxDeonxX, 19 janvier 2011 - 11:47 .

[David Gaider]

XxDeonxX wrote...
The Invasion of Kirkwall by the Qunari has broken The Llomerryn Accord.

The Qunari have invaded Kirkwall? Holy crap! Someone alert the--

--wait, when did this happen? I'm confused.

[David Gaider]

Ploppy wrote...
Gaider also claims that Isabela may not be a romance option. He's usually dishonest when talking to his fans.

I can hedge plenty, when I choose to. If I am careful with my words, it's because people like to read confirmation even into my lack of confirmation. They also like to interpret things I've said and then present them as fact.

In this case, I'm just not sure how we got to "the Qunari have invaded Kirkwall". There's plenty of reason to think they could, based on what Sten said, but no reason to think that they do outside of the fact that you certainly see Hawke fighting some in the trailer... and by all means no reason to think that they have.

It's speculation. Recognize it as such and you're fine.

[David Gaider]

NKKKK wrote...
Also, once again, Priestly confirmed in, maybe accidentally, maybe not, in a post some time ago about the "Qunari Invasion"

Is that so? Well clearly that must be the case, then.

Whatever. Carry on.

[David Gaider]

Piecake wrote...
I think what he is trying to say is that there could or could not be a Qunari invasion based on the choices you make, and just doesnt want to spoil the amazingly awesome news

What I'm saying is that what Chris said (or did not say, I have no idea) might just be a simplification. Someone entering my home is an invasion. The Beatles were an invasion. Pirates landing on my porch is an invasion. It does not mean that Kirkwall or the Free Marches is under assault by the Qunari nation.

Or maybe it does. Talking about it in the past tense simply seemed confusing.

I'd just be careful about your interpretations before you get carried away. My impulse for Expectations Management demands it. But carry on.

[David Gaider]

PsychoBlonde wrote...
It's not that the Qunari are dishonest, exactly, it's that they have a completely different view of what honesty and honor consist of.

This is it. Sten said qunari do not lie-- and they don't-- but what a lie is to a qunari and what it is to humans are probably not quite the same thing.