Personally, I am not a fan. What I see in that picture is what one might jokingly guess what a very old male turian looks like, i.e. features being misshapen, 'hair' falling out, shrivelled/smaller stature, etc.
But more seriously, I have some thoughts on the matter. Of course, the following is based largely on hints, speculation, and inferencing.
Though they've been mentioned before in the thread, that are some in-game references that imply turian females have fringes, such as the bachelor party and Garrus. Garrus also indicates that females
might be of shorter or smaller stature than males, but much more limbre, and possibly more lightly-built as a result (that being the 'reach and flexibility' comment he makes when describing his match-up to the scout).
Now, to be frank, the overall design that Dark Horse has presented is not altogether disconcerting. The turian depicted appears to be of a slightly smaller stature (perhaps not as much as I would prefer, but regardless), with emphasis on the shape of the hips, and a perhaps a more slender build. As for the mandibles, they are not really an issue, to my mind. However, the lack of a fringe bothers me.
Yes, I have seen it stated that the small spike at the top of her forehead might be considered a fringe to the species, and far be it for me to disagree when so little data is available regarding cultural norms and the like. That said, my
guess would be that the spike would
not be considered a fringe, even among turians. This derives from both the comment about the asari in the bachelor party, and also by the fact that fringes seem to be a very prominent part of turian identity, as is implied by the aforementioned turians in the games. That the fringe would be removed from turian females entirely strikes me as an odd decision on the part of the designers.
Both superficial and distinctive sexual dimorphism has been referenced in regards to avians and their influence on turian design. However, the general consensus seems to be that males typically have more distinctive, colourful, or exaggerated phyiscal characteristics. However, and forgive my lack of decent knowledge on birds, my understanding is that said male characteristics are often present in the females as well, but usually in a more subdued form. peacocks and peahens, for example: peahens, while lacking the colourful 'fan' of the males, still possess tail feathers. They do not have bare rumps, the feature completely absent.
Indeed, though it is a stretch, by such thinking the turian females would similiarly possess subdued versions of the males' fringes, perhaps in the form of flat plates, or spines that only extend to the rear edge of the skull. Again, removing the fringe entirely seems excessive and 'unnatural' (an admittedly weak claim, given that this is sci-fi). With the plates vs. skin question regarding adaptation to the environment, I would think that those fringe spines would be designed to reflect light or dissipate heat, given how hot Palaven is said to be. I can not speak to their purpose regarding radiation, that might have to do more with the skin itself, but it seems reasonable to assume that the plates/spines would be common to all turians, under those circumstances.
Again, obvious speculation on my part.
To take the debate out of the universe, I can see merit in both sides of the argument over the appearance, the principle ones appearing to be "aliens' standards of attractiveness are different from humans'" and "the design is lacking and/or unappealing". On the one hand, yes, alien standards are indeed bound to be very different, and perhaps the depicted female is extremely attractive to her male fellows. Who knows! And yes, the idea that a more 'realistic' approach to the design is being taken, given the current examples of the asari, quarians, and drell, is heartening on some level.
But for the very same reason, that being those three species, it strikes me as odd that Bioware would do a complete about-face from past alien designs and follow this route. After all, the asari are obviously intended to appeal to human players, of that I feel there is no question. Thane - and therefore the drell species, one assumes - was stated as to having been designed to appear alien, yet still be attractive to players, given his role as a potential love interest. Even the quarians, suited as they are, are very much depicted in line with human standards of attractiveness, as a large measure of Tali's fan support (even before ME2 was released) can attest.
Even the species who are not necessarily sexualized and highlighted as potential love interests, males turians in the time of ME1 being a prime example, were designed in such a way to be aesthetically appealing to the players. 'Cool' or 'interesting' as opposed to 'attractive,' if you will. I think that can be said of just about any species in the Mass Effect universe, including the elcor or hanar. Their design is likely not intended to appeal in an sexual sense, and yet players find their physical appearance compelling, nonetheless.
If I may take this in a more personal, informal direction, I think that the fringe is a very cool feature of the turian design in the males that we had been shown up until the release of Evolution. And to somewhat spite my earlier comments (was making the effort to be open-minded), the female in the comic is actually not all that different from the males. She is still quite robust, and besides the fringe the changes to her overall features are minor at best. Now, some people are in favour of little sexual dimorphism, for the charm of a more realistic design. Fair enough, I can relate on some level. However, I have to agree that the thought that this turian female is a male with his fringe cut off, as has been stated earlier in the thread, has definitely crossed my mind.
To me, such a design choice is not very compelling, and yes, comes across as lazy. Sure, they should not necessarily have to comply with human standards of attractiveness. For example, I am against the idea of breasts, lips, and so forth on them, because that would strike me as distinctly un-turian, not to mention unrealistic. But that doesn't mean the definition of turian femininity has to come across as even more masculine, to us, than the design of the male turians themselves. Furthermore, I strongly suspect that there will not be a female turian romance option in ME3, so attractiveness to the player is likely not a major concern, and rightly so in that case. But even so, I would hope they might consider that the design may not only contradict some of the canon, but also seems bizarre, given what has been implied and demonstrated in the past.
Apologies for the rant.
P.S. Something else occurs to me, this levelled at Dark Horse: Do you think it might be possible that they were
trying to make the female turians more attractive to players? Smoother features, for one, and more shapely hips, for another. But also, perhaps they thought the fringe was unattractive to players, because it was so alien? I mean, baldness strikes me a being more akin to humans than the fringe does. Maybe they were hoping for a 'Jack'-vibe?
Weird thought, I know, but it struck me as kind of funny.
Modifié par Ride2Ruin25, 21 janvier 2011 - 03:36 .