Female Turians in ME: Evolution
#51
Posté 20 janvier 2011 - 12:57
#52
Posté 20 janvier 2011 - 12:58
Shavon wrote...
I would have expected better!
Some species of birds, the females are more decorated than the males, why didn't they just do that?
D=
Do you mind naming some?
For the most part, its the other way around. Males are bright and have the large plummage, females are dull and camoflauged. This makes sense due to females being the nesters and the males being the defenders. The males have to scare away or distract predators while the females sit on the nest and hide. Not to mention mating plummage.
Examples:
-peacocks
-Ostriches
-Many parrot species
-Quails and Pheasants
-Mallard ducks (heck 90% of all ducks)
-A lot of raptor species (falcons, eagles etc.)
Turians fit the correct pattern for Earth birds.
#53
Posté 20 janvier 2011 - 01:01
inspiration != trufax for comparison.
Modifié par skyferret, 20 janvier 2011 - 01:02 .
#54
Posté 20 janvier 2011 - 01:01
Hopefully DH's interpretation is just that...their interpretation...which has been pretty crappy across the board for all aliens and humans they have churned out for the comics thus far.
Also, birds are varied. There are many species of sexually dimorphous birds, yes...but there are many who are sexually monomorphous as well. And the degree of dimorphism also varies...some look like different species, some have only vague differences (and sometimes even then it's only at particular times of the year such as with the Vasa parrot). And again, you have the sexually monomorphous species where males and females are the spitting image of each other.
To say that turians MUST show extreme sexual dimorphism because they have avian qualities is untrue.
NOW THAT SAID: If BW ultimately goes with DH's interpretation in ME3, then that's what they do. It's their choice. I'd be very disappointed with them upending their own canon (again, I suppose) and it does mess with my head canon (in my defense, I had attempted to keep it within the realm of what was then-currently revealed by canon). I can't say I'm thrilled with this interpretation. If anything, it makes me want to writhe. But I will accept whatever BW ultimately settles on and if this becomes canon then... *shudders* ...it becomes canon.
For now...I am going to chalk this up to DH-fail, which is pretty common with their comics now.
Modifié par Eradyn, 20 janvier 2011 - 01:15 .
#55
Posté 20 janvier 2011 - 01:12
skyferret wrote...
Shorter plummage != lack of plummage.
inspiration != trufax for comparison.
You're kidding right?
Look at the first picture. Look at it. Its pretty obvious that her top "spike" is not lying flat against her head. There's a GAP lifting her fringe up and off her head. Its a fringe, just a small one.
Also, there's going to be variation between members of a species. The Turian we see HAS A FRINGE, its just really small. Other females may have slightly larger ones.
Honestly, the people complaining must simply have nothing better to do.
Whining and complaining about a LIE =/= an issue
#56
Posté 20 janvier 2011 - 01:12
So they're to be congratulated for making female aliens that don't conform to Earth conceptions of femininity, but it's okay that they make female aliens that follow Earth conceptions of avian biology?Omega-202 wrote...
Based on their avian inspiration, they make perfect sense. Slighter build, shorter "plummage", more earthy/brown-yellow color...that's exactly what you'd expect from a female bird of prey. Male birds are the ones with brighter colors and fancier plumes.
You can't expect a female bird alien to have ta-tas. At that point, BioWare would lose all remaining self respect. Its hard enough to believe that Quarians and Asari also have (what appear to be) mammary glands in the same location as humans.
It could always be worse, they could have made them even more alien and drove home the "Turians are super militaristic Romans" point by making the females a complete caricature where they are second class and below/inferior to the males.
Veeeeeeery interesting.
Modifié par Nightwriter, 20 janvier 2011 - 01:13 .
#57
Posté 20 janvier 2011 - 01:12
#58
Posté 20 janvier 2011 - 01:12
#59
Posté 20 janvier 2011 - 01:13
Modifié par morrie23, 20 janvier 2011 - 01:18 .
#60
Posté 20 janvier 2011 - 01:19
Omega-202 wrote...
You're kidding right?
Look at the first picture. Look at it. Its pretty obvious that her top "spike" is not lying flat against her head. There's a GAP lifting her fringe up and off her head. Its a fringe, just a small one.
Also, there's going to be variation between members of a species. The Turian we see HAS A FRINGE, its just really small. Other females may have slightly larger ones.
Honestly, the people complaining must simply have nothing better to do.
Whining and complaining about a LIE =/= an issue
Compare that 'fringe' to the size of the rest of her head. It's miniscule. No. A bird with a single feather is a doomed bird, going along with your frequent turians are birds! idealogy.
#61
Posté 20 janvier 2011 - 01:24
#62
Posté 20 janvier 2011 - 01:25
Babli wrote...
They just cant draw aliens. Look at Wrex in Genesis comics. Nuff said.
Not just the aliens. They can't get the humans right, either. XD
#63
Posté 20 janvier 2011 - 01:28
Don't forget Earth bugs, 99% of the species we know about, the males are the most colorful. Beside, Turians more closely resemble crickets anyway...Omega-202 wrote...
Shavon wrote...
I would have expected better!
Some species of birds, the females are more decorated than the males, why didn't they just do that?
D=
Do you mind naming some?
For the most part, its the other way around. Males are bright and have the large plummage, females are dull and camoflauged. This makes sense due to females being the nesters and the males being the defenders. The males have to scare away or distract predators while the females sit on the nest and hide. Not to mention mating plummage.
Examples:
-peacocks
-Ostriches
-Many parrot species
-Quails and Pheasants
-Mallard ducks (heck 90% of all ducks)
-A lot of raptor species (falcons, eagles etc.)
Turians fit the correct pattern for Earth birds.
#64
Posté 20 janvier 2011 - 01:28
Of course, when they talk their voices will ruin it for me. Unless they have oddly raspy, masculine voices...
#65
Guest_AwesomeName_*
Posté 20 janvier 2011 - 01:29
Guest_AwesomeName_*
Jobrill wrote...
While Dark Horse's art is admittedly atrocious as always, I am 100% in favor of Female Aliens who don't conform to human standards of beauty, and would have 0 trouble if Female Turians show up in ME3 (or a future ME2 DLC) looking like this.
I agree with this. I mean I'd be lying if I said I didn't want to see a female turian that could give me a boner, BUT, rationally I completely agree with what this guy says (apart from the Dark Horse art comment, I've no idea about that).
#66
Posté 20 janvier 2011 - 01:29
Eradyn wrote...
Babli wrote...
They just cant draw aliens. Look at Wrex in Genesis comics. Nuff said.
Not just the aliens. They can't get the humans right, either. XD
The humans are fine, at least in the printed comics, I don't know about Genesis. I don't have that because... I have ME1.
#67
Posté 20 janvier 2011 - 01:31
I personally would have preferred it if there was no difference between the male and female turians, then have bioware go "You guys are just racist, can't tell Turians apart, shame on you"
#68
Posté 20 janvier 2011 - 01:33
DirtyVagrant wrote...
Eradyn wrote...
Babli wrote...
They just cant draw aliens. Look at Wrex in Genesis comics. Nuff said.
Not just the aliens. They can't get the humans right, either. XD
The humans are fine, at least in the printed comics, I don't know about Genesis. I don't have that because... I have ME1.
I meant regarding them trying to draw the canon characters. Yeah, humans look human (generally). The aliens are usually off.
Modifié par Eradyn, 20 janvier 2011 - 01:33 .
#69
Posté 20 janvier 2011 - 01:35
Eradyn wrote...
DirtyVagrant wrote...
Eradyn wrote...
Babli wrote...
They just cant draw aliens. Look at Wrex in Genesis comics. Nuff said.
Not just the aliens. They can't get the humans right, either. XD
The humans are fine, at least in the printed comics, I don't know about Genesis. I don't have that because... I have ME1.
I meant regarding them trying to draw the canon characters. Yeah, humans look human (generally). The aliens are usually off.
Ahhhh, I see. I have no idea on their take on the canon characters. I will admit that they have the turians mouths open far wider when they talk than seen in the games.
#70
Posté 20 janvier 2011 - 01:40
#71
Posté 20 janvier 2011 - 01:42
I was wondering, how exactly is a waist unsuportive?Marta Rio wrote...
Hmmm, well, even if her fringe isn't that impressive, her waist does look very supportive. (Dat waist?)
#72
Posté 20 janvier 2011 - 01:43
Other than that, I guess it's okay.
#73
Guest_AwesomeName_*
Posté 20 janvier 2011 - 01:44
Guest_AwesomeName_*
#74
Posté 20 janvier 2011 - 01:53
We can officially say that Male Shep/Female Turian romances are out of the question now.
So gonna get flamed for that. LOL
BRING IT ON!
#75
Posté 20 janvier 2011 - 01:58
AwesomeName wrote...
I am curious to know who came up with the design - Matt Rhodes? If that's the case I fully support it. Otherwise I've no problem if he changes it a bit.
Matt Rhodes made "Boiled Pig Garrus." Sadly, even he is not infallible.
I'm still going to be hoping for a refined design by ME3 from BW that isn't...DH.





Retour en haut




