DamnThoseDisplayNames wrote...
I think that those mages can serve people's needs much better than priests and templars, which makes idea of Chantry less believable for me.No disrespect, but I am kinda missing your point here.
I have an example here, given how the internet likes comparing everything to black people, but that is an aside. For 8 or so years, I had dreds. As a black man with dreds, I was asked things from being jamacian, to being a pothead. I am none of these things, but as a black man with dreds I am compared to these things by people, and it's something I had to deal with when I had dreds. I had one coworker who stated I looked 'professional' when I cut them off, wearing the same clothes I had on when I had them. My point.
Even if there are a bunch of people doing good things, you are compared to the people who do bad things because thats what people do intrinsically. You don't thank the movie theater for playing your movie properly, or having clean floors. You don't thank the pilot for landing your plane safely (well, people do that wierd applause thing nowadays, but my point remains) You don't thank a fast food joint for giving you fresh french fries. No one does. But people will remember sticky floors, old fries and a dry bun. People don't care about the good that people do, because they are more directly affected by the bad. A lot of people who think of the freedom of mages don't care about the villager who's children are being stolen by a blood mage. If I were a mage, I'd want freedom. I'd go to Rivain or the Tevinter imperium. But for all the regular people, if it weren't for the Chantry, there would be a lot more Blackmarshes. So I can understand as someone who hates playing mages why the Chantry has power. Mages do a poor job of stopping the crazy. And as such, an organization that controls them will be favored, when the majority of people aren't mages.
Modifié par Harid, 21 janvier 2011 - 08:42 .





Retour en haut







