457 réponses à ce sujet

[Atakuma]

Beaner28 wrote...

I'm not trying to impress anyone. Words can't express how much I don't care about your personal opinions.

If you didn't care, you wouldn't have responded.

[Beaner28]

Blacklash93 wrote...

With a company of Bioware's stature and resources, we should be getting both.

+10

You said what the BioWare apologists won't say.

[crimzontearz]

CoS Sarah Jinstar wrote...

crimzontearz wrote...
this entire discussion is futile, the only screens that should be open to judgement are the official PC ones OR console shots at the native resolution.......AND belonging to the latest build regardless of the platform. Anything else is way too subject to circumstantial factors to be representative of the final quality of the game

Does it really matter when just about every screen shot the game looks pretty asstastic visually anyway? I mean really.

Fancy that, the ones that are praised for being really good are the official screens and the native res console screens from the specialized sites

Sarah we argued before, at this point I cannot think about a single aspect of the game you do not find revolting. My suggestion to you at this point is to just leave and go play BG2 or NWN because as it is you are doing NOTHING but ***** and moan all the time....about everything....often arbitrarily or "just because"

[ankuu]

Beaner28 wrote...

Blacklash93 wrote...

With a company of Bioware's stature and resources, we should be getting both.

+10

You said what the BioWare apologists won't say.

Oh so those who truly like the graphics and don't agree with you are ass-kissers. Interesting. I am glad you told me that!

Bioware, gimmie yer ass!

Modifié par ankuu, 22 janvier 2011 - 07:40 .

[Beaner28]

ankuu wrote...

Beaner28 wrote...

Blacklash93 wrote...

With a company of Bioware's stature and resources, we should be getting both.

+10

You said what the BioWare apologists won't say.

Oh so those who truly like the graphics and don't agree with you are ass-kissers. Interesting. I am glad you told me that!

Most of the posters here are BioWare-does-no-wrong ass kissers.

[Sauronych]

Wow, these two screenshots look absolutely terrible. I can live with bad graphics and it's not a reason to cancel my pre-order but still I'm surprised how they've managed to make a game's sequel look worse than the original. It seems a high-res texture mod is going to be a must.

[Top Gun volleyball]

I hope those screens aren't indicative of the finished product because those screens look like ass.



*fingers crossed*

[Top Gun volleyball]

Sauronych wrote...

Wow, these two screenshots look absolutely terrible. I can live with bad graphics and it's not a reason to cancel my pre-order but still I'm surprised how they've managed to make a game's sequel look worse than the original. It seems a high-res texture mod is going to be a must.

We might not even get a toolset this time.

[Beaner28]

Sauronych wrote...

Wow, these two screenshots look absolutely terrible.

LOL

[Atakuma]

Beaner28 wrote...

Most of the posters here are BioWare-does-no-wrong ass kissers.

Does your mommy know you're using her computer?

[Beaner28]

Atakuma wrote...

Beaner28 wrote...

Most of the posters here are BioWare-does-no-wrong ass kissers.

Does your mommy know you're using her computer?

Would my mother own a rig with GTX 285s in SLI? Please.

Modifié par Beaner28, 22 janvier 2011 - 07:48 .

[Loerwyn]

Steffen wrote...
This is what i don't understand, if you don't support bioware why are you here?
you have a right to express your oppinion but what good does it do?

Who said I don't support BioWare?

[Meltemph]

That's such a stupid excuse. Bioware games are almost guaranteed to have a good story and the effort put into graphics has no effect on that.



With a company of Bioware's stature and resources, we should be getting both.

Their pixel count if fine. Whether you like the graphic style or not is subjective. I happen to think that in most of the screenshots the graphics look good, but there are few of them that make it look more messy(the reasons for that are unknown).



However, the idea that a company has to deliver a specific polygon count to be considered what we "should" be getting is silly.

Most of the posters here are BioWare-does-no-wrong ass kissers.

Forums like these always have about the same amount of haters as fanboys. Whatever you think makes your arguments more valid, right?

[tmp7704]

crimzontearz wrote...

Fancy that, the ones that are praised for being really good are the official screens and the native res console screens from the specialized sites

I'm under impression all screenshots published so far are "official" or otherwise approved beforehand, that's why we get to see the same few images all over the intrawebs and in various articles. Sometimes one of the sites messes up the gamma or whatever and we get purple Hawke or overlit pictures, but that's rare.

[ViSeiRa]

This is a little disturbing, the graphics in the last dev diary was pretty good, the screenshot with the darkspawn looks crap, I can't make my mind whether I like the graphics or not but the environment and characters on this screenshot look meh to me... maybe the dev diary was heavily edited or maybe this is just a bad screenshot but either way I never judge RPGs by their graphics.

[KhorinShizucor]

Beaner28 wrote...

ankuu wrote...

Beaner28 wrote...

Blacklash93 wrote...

With a company of Bioware's stature and resources, we should be getting both.

+10

You said what the BioWare apologists won't say.

Oh so those who truly like the graphics and don't agree with you are ass-kissers. Interesting. I am glad you told me that!

Most of the posters here are BioWare-does-no-wrong ass kissers.

Well, then it's good to have you around to balance the fanboys/girls.

[Blacklash93]

I have nothing against the art style at all. And I never said there's some sort of required polygon or pixel count. Don't put words in my mouth.

I just want the game to look good. Up to par with current Bioware standards. Up to par with ME2. There are times when this looks even worse than Origins so Bioware clearly isn't delivering.

The textures simply look terrible half the time. It's as simple as that. It's not an art style issue, it's a quality issue.

Modifié par Blacklash93, 22 janvier 2011 - 08:02 .

[ViSeiRa]

Blacklash93 wrote...

I have nothing against the art style at all. And I never said there's some sort of required polygon or pixel count. Don't put words in my mouth.

I just want the game to look good. Up to par with ME2. There are times when this looks even worse than Origins so Bioware clearly isn't delivering.

Which is why you should hold off judgement, because there are times when it looks better too, either way we still can't form a full opinion of graphics yet as Bioware doesn't seem to have a strategy when releasing screenshots, they release them from different stages in development I think which isn't helping at all... the latest dev diary look very good, these screenshots don't.

[Blacklash93]

The last dev diary looked terrible as well. It had the same quality issues as these screenshots.



The latest 360 screens on IGN, however, looked good.

[elirian_19]

Blacklash93 wrote...

I have nothing against the art style at all. And I never said there's some sort of required polygon or pixel count. Don't put words in my mouth.

I just want the game to look good. Up to par with current Bioware standards. Up to par with ME2. There are times when this looks even worse than Origins so Bioware clearly isn't delivering.

The textures simply look terrible half the time. It's as simple as that.

And that's completely fine, but something looking good is a matter of opinion. The saying, "You can't please all of the people all of the time" suddenly comes to mind.

Modifié par elirian_19, 22 janvier 2011 - 08:08 .

[Beaner28]

KhorinShizucor wrote...

Well, then it's good to have you around to balance the fanboys/girls.

/bow

[Meltemph]

I have nothing against the art style at all. And I never said there's some sort of required polygon or pixel count. Don't put words in my mouth.



I just want the game to look good. Up to par with current Bioware standards. Up to par with ME2. There are times when this looks even worse than Origins so Bioware clearly isn't delivering.



The textures simply look terrible half the time. It's as simple as that. It's not an art style issue, it's a quality issue.

So dramatic... If you think that the max quality of the pc version is represented in the little bits that are shown to us... Well, all I can say is we will see how accurate that description is come launch.



And if you don't wan't me to "put words in your mouth" be more descriptive with your implications. The way you worded it, seemed to me, to imply that they should have a specific poly count to be considered what we should be getting.

[C9316]

Isn't it great that we all can get along!

[Blacklash93]

elirian_19 wrote...

Blacklash93 wrote...

I have nothing against the art style at all. And I never said there's some sort of required polygon or pixel count. Don't put words in my mouth.

I just want the game to look good. Up to par with current Bioware standards. Up to par with ME2. There are times when this looks even worse than Origins so Bioware clearly isn't delivering.

The textures simply look terrible half the time. It's as simple as that.

And that's completely fine, but something looking good is a matter of opinion. The saying, "You can't please all of the people all of the time" suddenly comes to mind.

Tell me these look good.





Then there's stuff like this which actually looks good.




Some bits look pretty inconsistent, if you ask me.

Modifié par Blacklash93, 22 janvier 2011 - 08:19 .

[Meltemph]

Pretty inconsistent, if you ask me.

So because the screenshots are inconsistent, you believe that is how the game is going to be, graphics wise? Erm, well, I guess we will see come launch, I guess.

Modifié par Meltemph, 22 janvier 2011 - 08:20 .