Dave of Canada wrote...
They wore all the same armor in Origins too. Darkspawn love coordinating outfits before raids.
There were differences. Palette, face paint, armors, etc.
Modifié par Harid, 22 janvier 2011 - 01:20 .
Dave of Canada wrote...
They wore all the same armor in Origins too. Darkspawn love coordinating outfits before raids.
Modifié par Harid, 22 janvier 2011 - 01:20 .
Dave of Canada wrote...
I like the new darkspawn more.
Ogres didn't blend in with the mudspawn and now they fit in perfectly fine with the new darkspawn who sort of look like their "parent" race.
Modifié par Reaverwind, 22 janvier 2011 - 01:15 .
Modifié par Brockololly, 22 janvier 2011 - 01:19 .
Well, they where Hurlock Emissarys who drank the Blood of Grey Warden and became Disciples.Tleining wrote...
"And what does this make of the talking Emissarys in Awakening? Lost, First, Withered, Herald? Did they really look like this? How does it work with the new design?"
uh, The Lost and The First were Disciples, Darkspawn that drank the Blood of Grey Warden and became something more than Darkspawn.
But in the past, Emissarys where Genlocks and Hurlocks. Now they are not. It's like Spider-Man suddenly being black. They could still say it was just a designe change but if Peter Parker never was black before then he should not suddenly be black just because they have a new designer for him and say that it changes nothing.Why should the Design-changes in DA2 change what happened in DA:O? The
Bioware-Officials compared this to Design-changes in comics. Different
Artists try different things for how the characters look. It doesn't
change the past.
Brockololly wrote...
I can get used to the new designs, even if I'm not a huge fan of them now. I didn't necessarily care for how the darkspawn looked in Origins, but I thought it was more that they needed to be tweaked a little. They just don't seem very threatening now and are more like a bunch of genetic misfits than feared monsters of the underground.
I think my biggest problem with the new darkspawn is that their designs all look quite unique, and yet it would seem they're copy/pasted on to everyone of the same race much more obviously than Origins. Origins darkspawn shared some armor, but there were variations within the hurlocks, genlocks and so forth. I think its because the devs have said they want the darkspawn armor to look scrapped together (which is a fine idea), yet it looks silly when all the hurlocks or emissaries have their "scrapped together" armor in the exact same configuration. Or how all the hurlocks have the exact same bloody tears/smudges on their faces. It just makes them out to be Total War style clone soldiers.
Swenglish ftwAlso, please discuss in a fare way without insults och namecalling!
Modifié par drahelvete, 22 janvier 2011 - 01:26 .
Johnny Shepard wrote...
No, but that would mean that thoes Emissarys (Lost, First, Herald, Withered aso) really looked like they do in Dragon Age II and that there are no Hurlock Emissary or Genlock Emissary, just Emissary. And talking.
My first reaction to the new Emissary was that they looked really silly. So now the friendly Emissary who helps you save the city/keep in Awakening looked like that? And he then when around descised as human, saving people. How could a giant alien looking thing like the new Emissary go and pass for human, living with them?
Well, who knows now. They don't have lips. They can't speak properly.Shadow of Light Dragon wrote...
Johnny Shepard wrote...
No, but that would mean that thoes Emissarys (Lost, First, Herald, Withered aso) really looked like they do in Dragon Age II and that there are no Hurlock Emissary or Genlock Emissary, just Emissary. And talking.
My first reaction to the new Emissary was that they looked really silly. So now the friendly Emissary who helps you save the city/keep in Awakening looked like that? And he then when around descised as human, saving people. How could a giant alien looking thing like the new Emissary go and pass for human, living with them?
Actually, not all of the Disciples were Emissaries. The First, for instance, was a regular 'awakened' Hurlock. He was a warrior, complete with two-handed sword and armour. The Messenger was also a talking Hurlock warrior.
So it's possible being awakened grants speech, you don't have to be an emissary.
I fear what shrieks are going to look like. Probably Driders keeping up with the changing **** for the sake of changing **** trend they are going for. Hell, lets make them Man-bats. Because at least they'll be Biowares. News flash, if Bioware thinks people thought DA looked generic because of the Darkspawn, then they need to research better. It was more than the Darkspawn. And fans generally don't like it when you change **** for the sake of it after a successful predecessor.
Darkspawn group ralley.Dave of Canada wrote...
They wore all the same armor in Origins too, darkspawn love coordinating outfits before raids.
Modifié par Steffen, 22 janvier 2011 - 01:48 .
Reaverwind wrote...
So, the new Darkspawn include Skeletor clones, baboons, and simpering darkspawn in dresses? I'll be laughing my way through the darkspawn battles.
Modifié par Jzadek72, 22 janvier 2011 - 01:48 .
I didn't mean it that way. I used Peter parker because everybody knew him and I just could not come up with any other change that would work. Skincollour doesn't just change over night. You are born the way you are. There could not be that change suddenly unless you made a reboot, then it wouldn't make a difference how he look. But in continuing the already existing Spider-Man comics by making sequels you can't make that sort of change and say its just a new design.Harid wrote...
There is nothing intrinsic to the character of Peter Parker that he has to be a white guy, he is white because white people were the only heroes of the time. Stop using poor analogies, relating to black people. Geez.
Johnny Shepard wrote...
I didn't mean it that way. I used Peter parker because everybody knew him and I just could not come up with any other change that would work. Skincollour doesn't just change over night. You are born the way you are. There could not be that change suddenly unless you made a reboot, then it wouldn't make a difference how he look. But in continuing the already existing Spider-Man comics by making sequels you can't make that sort of change and say its just a new design.Harid wrote...
There is nothing intrinsic to the character of Peter Parker that he has to be a white guy, he is white because white people were the only heroes of the time. Stop using poor analogies, relating to black people. Geez.
Sure, it was not the best analogy but we where talking about the design change in Dragon Age II being like a design change in comics and this was the easiest I could come up with.
And as a not: I'm not a racist or anything. It was just a way of comparing. For me its just looks. Everybody is the same on the inside. And thats why I compared it like this.
Modifié par Harid, 22 janvier 2011 - 01:53 .
Same here. I wonder if we will se any in DA2 and how they will look.Big_Chief wrote...
The disciples are still my favorite iteration of the darkspawn. They look much more unique, interesting, and intimidating that the regular version from Origins. These new ones look...odd. I dunno. Maybe they'll grow on me or something. I think it's the hoods more than anything else.
Shepard Lives wrote...
Emissaries, well, I think they've replaced Shrieks. Which is fine by me, considering that A) Shrieks were IMO the worst-designed darkspawn in DAOAccording to the legends it was the elves that first learned the proper use of magic (if I recall correctly) C) I like that they're a new darkspawn type rather than Hurlocks/Genlocks with feathery hats and a staff.
Gavinthelocust wrote...
Silly man, Shrieks are still around according to Legends.