What ARE the Reapers?
#26
Posté 23 janvier 2011 - 09:37
#27
Posté 23 janvier 2011 - 09:44
#28
Posté 23 janvier 2011 - 10:28
That or they are from another universe, etc.
#29
Posté 23 janvier 2011 - 11:15
#30
Guest_dasher red_*
Posté 23 janvier 2011 - 12:51
Guest_dasher red_*
I'm kidding of course, simple AI evolution can have made the plans, much like skynet from the Terminator movies; it evolved and created robots. But as to what race made the Reapers is a great question indeed, maybe they were made from the forge of creation, or they just simply have existed much like sovereign said.
But if I were to choose which race created them, I would say the keepers.
Modifié par dasher red, 23 janvier 2011 - 12:54 .
#31
Posté 23 janvier 2011 - 01:18
#32
Guest_xAlch3mIstx_*
Posté 23 janvier 2011 - 01:20
Guest_xAlch3mIstx_*
http://social.biowar...3/index/4811541
#33
Posté 23 janvier 2011 - 01:23
Bluko wrote...
Likely a bunch of hyper-intelligent sapient cuddlefish
Reaper for love interest in ME3--make it so.
#34
Posté 23 janvier 2011 - 01:58
ScorpSt,
I love your theory. "Technological ascension" has always fascinated me.
Marshalleck,
*LOL* Erm, how would Shepard and a Reaper "consummate" their relationship? Shepard agrees to become part of the Reaper, or the Reaper sacrifices itself for Shepard's sake, NOT attacking Earth? I would love to see the possibility of this play out, if only in a comedy machinima. Something tells me that BioWare probably wouldn't add "Reaper" as a romanceable character.
http://www.youtube.c...er?feature=mhum
#35
Posté 23 janvier 2011 - 02:53
Would be interesting to see an ending when the universe comes to an end as a result of destruction reapers.MsFicwriter wrote...
1. Unless the Reapers are akin to (a) god/s, that means that they existed before the universe was even formed...
#36
Posté 23 janvier 2011 - 03:08
I think that discovering the origin and motivation of the Reapers will be a key component in stopping them.
#37
Posté 23 janvier 2011 - 04:19
#38
Posté 23 janvier 2011 - 05:12
Modifié par meiwow, 23 janvier 2011 - 05:13 .
#39
Posté 23 janvier 2011 - 05:15
#40
Posté 23 janvier 2011 - 05:25
#41
Posté 23 janvier 2011 - 05:47
Lets say.. if you've seen Terminator movies you can figure quite easily how Reapers came to be.
Modifié par jimmyfi, 23 janvier 2011 - 05:49 .
#42
Posté 23 janvier 2011 - 06:25
Things like that don't "evolve" naturally. Someone or something built them.
I prefer to think of them as ancient sentient warships constructed by a long dead (perhaps the first) galactic civilization, who's original programming or purpose was corrupted over the millenia. Their motivations may be as simple as exactly what Sovereign tells you; that they exist to "impose order on the chaos of organic evolution." It's possible we'll learn their true origins in ME3, but I'm unsure whether we'll ever truly discover the madness to their method as, like Sovereign says, the Reapers are simply "beyond our comprehension."
Modifié par JKoopman, 23 janvier 2011 - 06:27 .
#43
Posté 23 janvier 2011 - 06:37
The implication that they are giant cyborgs in ME2 lends a lot of weight to the once organic species achieving immortality through technological ascension.
Will be interesting to see! I hope Bioware does tackle it, instead of pulling a "Tali's face," on us.
#44
Posté 23 janvier 2011 - 06:44
images.icanhascheezburger.com/completestore/2009/2/21/128796824239325746.jpg
and the reapers gained their first foot hold on galactic domination.
Modifié par Andy379, 23 janvier 2011 - 06:46 .
#45
Posté 23 janvier 2011 - 07:08
Either they were constructed by a highly advanced civilization, and then destroyed them,
Or they were a highly advanced civilization that evolved themselves above the need for organic bodies.
Regardless, in both of those I also hold the theory that they need organics for something other than just reproduction, namely as some kind of fuel or something like that, and have justified their repeated genocide to themselves with the whole Superior Mechanical God complex.
#46
Posté 23 janvier 2011 - 07:11
A rock and the human brain are all composed of electrons, protons, and neutrons. It's the atomic organization that makes them different; the atomic weight. Now imagine all of known existence in one atom, our science is very limited when trying to imagine existence before the big bang.
So we take it with 'faith" that there was something before the big bang. Who on Earth is qualified to say what was or wasn't there?
Machines could have evolved first human beings are just self replicating biological machines.
#47
Posté 23 janvier 2011 - 07:24
Had-to-say wrote...
What do we know about super stong magnetic fields inside magnetars? As far as we know the periodic table may have a completely different atomic weight and application inside a magnetic field that strong. How do we know elements can't be manufactured inside electromagnetic 'furnaces'? There may be more than 92 known atoms inside a magnetar, do atoms even exist inside magnetars? I know it is all specualtion. The statement sentience can only exist in organic carbon based life forms seems terribly arrogant considering the nature of the universe. Just because the idea isn't comforting and easily understood doesn't mean it's outlandish. We know very little about magnetars.
A rock and the human brain are all composed of electrons, protons, and neutrons. It's the atomic organization that makes them different; the atomic weight. Now imagine all of known existence in one atom, our science is very limited when trying to imagine existence before the big bang.
So we take it with 'faith" that there was something before the big bang. Who on Earth is qualified to say what was or wasn't there?
Machines could have evolved first human beings are just self replicating biological machines.
But a naturally-evolved "machine" wouldn't look like a machine. It would just look like any other organic being. Reapers have internal pressurized compartments designed to support organic life. They have sophisticated element zero power plants and advanced mass accelerator weaponry. They have gears and servos and insulated cables and external cameras and holographic projectors. Things like that don't grow through the natural process of evolution (which, I might add, is a process of cell division and mutation; neither of which being something machines are capable of). They are built.
The idea that the Reapers just sprung up out of stardust and magnetic fields is ludicrous to the point where "a wizard did it" would actually be a more plausible explanation. That's like saying that, given a long enough timeline, my dusty old PC might spontaneously grow a new graphics card.
Modifié par JKoopman, 23 janvier 2011 - 07:29 .
#48
Posté 23 janvier 2011 - 08:11
Exiled Eagle wrote...
I'd rather not know, I want the origin of the Reapers to be kept a mystery.
I agree. Even Vigil says something about how it doesn't matter to Shepard what their game is, all that matters is that he stops them. I'd rather the writers put more effort into thinking of a way of stopping the Reapers that doesn't involve magic Goldblum viruses or science-breaking sunguns.
There is, however, the argument that stopping them could depend on understanding them, but I just can't see it happening.
JakeMacDon wrote...
Fifty million years ago, they were created by a race known as the Saberhagens.
'tis a true thing.
HA! I like you.
Modifié par Vengeful Nature, 23 janvier 2011 - 08:12 .
#49
Posté 23 janvier 2011 - 08:24
#50
Posté 23 janvier 2011 - 08:28
JKoopman wrote...
Had-to-say wrote...
What do we know about super stong magnetic fields inside magnetars? As far as we know the periodic table may have a completely different atomic weight and application inside a magnetic field that strong. How do we know elements can't be manufactured inside electromagnetic 'furnaces'? There may be more than 92 known atoms inside a magnetar, do atoms even exist inside magnetars? I know it is all specualtion. The statement sentience can only exist in organic carbon based life forms seems terribly arrogant considering the nature of the universe. Just because the idea isn't comforting and easily understood doesn't mean it's outlandish. We know very little about magnetars.
A rock and the human brain are all composed of electrons, protons, and neutrons. It's the atomic organization that makes them different; the atomic weight. Now imagine all of known existence in one atom, our science is very limited when trying to imagine existence before the big bang.
So we take it with 'faith" that there was something before the big bang. Who on Earth is qualified to say what was or wasn't there?
Machines could have evolved first human beings are just self replicating biological machines.
But a naturally-evolved "machine" wouldn't look like a machine. It would just look like any other organic being. Reapers have internal pressurized compartments designed to support organic life. They have sophisticated element zero power plants and advanced mass accelerator weaponry. They have gears and servos and insulated cables and external cameras and holographic projectors. Things like that don't grow through the natural process of evolution (which, I might add, is a process of cell division and mutation; neither of which being something machines are capable of). They are built.
The idea that the Reapers just sprung up out of stardust and magnetic fields is ludicrous to the point where "a wizard did it" would actually be a more plausible explanation. That's like saying that, given a long enough timeline, my dusty old PC might spontaneously grow a new graphics card.
This is true. Reapers are too technologically sophisticated to have simply "evolved". Reapers were created. By whom? We don't know, and I doubt we find out.
Who do I think created them? The Keepers. Trash it all you want, but I can't think of any better options.





Retour en haut






