34 réponses à ce sujet

[Dean_the_Young]

Xilizhra wrote...

Khan, anyone who's proposed solution can be summed up as 'and then I shoot him in the head with malicious glee to show him his place' can be called a fascist.

Fascism is political. How can a dispute between two soldiers be called that?

How not? Your dispute is political. How you handle it is political. The manner in which you handle it is political in its own right as well.

While military and civilian sectors have long clashed of which has precedence to what extent, politics does not and has never stoped at the uniform.

That's more than a little overstating it. First off, betray you in favor of whom?

It's impossible to betray someone in favor of oneself?

Not really, nor is that what he really did.

You shared a problem: a large group of mercs, with open hostile intent, blocking your way and clearly intent on fighting you if you progressed. He fixed it, albeit in a manner you did not approve, but at the same time did not priorly rule out.

[omgodzilla]

I could care less about a bunch of workers. Killing Video sounds like it would have a more significant impact on ME3.

[STG]

Knowing how merc and criminal groups of that kind work, another "Vido" will step up soon enough regardless of your choice. Next Vido in line could be softer, as crazy or worse than this one.



As far as Zaeed goes, he demonstrated that he's a loose cannon and can make questionable decisions in a fight. If you're comfortable with that, getting his loyalty makes sense.

[FrancisKitt]

EDITL That and Zaeed has one of the I kill the workers.  

They seem to lack knowledge of two things:

Jumping

Medi-Gel

That worker could've made that jump with little more than a broken ankle/leg. Probably wouldn't have been harmed at all if Shepard or a squad member had caught him. Either way, bastards were too dumb to live.

EDIT: That and Zaeed has an awesome voice, which for me is one of the most important attributes for a great character to have (see characters played by Simon Templeman and Samuel L. Jackson).

Modifié par FrancisKitt, 24 janvier 2011 - 06:28 .

[Spartas Husky]

JG The Gamer wrote...
Zaeed is angry with you and disloyal as a result (can be rectified with the right morality check).

since when does zaeed becomes unloyal? he sitll loyal no matter which you pick

[Dean_the_Young]

If you choose to leave Vido behind, the only way to keep Zaeed's loyalty is a persuasion cop-out.

[LorDC]

"War is continuation of political intercourse, carried on with other means." Carl Von Clausewitz

[Spartas Husky]

Dean_the_Young wrote...

If you choose to leave Vido behind, the only way to keep Zaeed's loyalty is a persuasion cop-out.

....really? well I always choose the paragon option so I never had a problem with his loyalty.

[FlintlockJazz]

Dean_the_Young wrote...
Not really, nor is that what he really did.

You shared a problem: a large group of mercs, with open hostile intent, blocking your way and clearly intent on fighting you if you progressed. He fixed it, albeit in a manner you did not approve, but at the same time did not priorly rule out.

He betrayed your trust in him.  When a friend does something against you they are betraying your trust in them.  Zaeed pulls a gun on you, for that Shepard should empty his clip into him.  As I'm sure even Zaeed knows, you don't pull a gun on someone unless you're willing to use it, which he was and its a crime that you cannot execute him there and then for it (put another bullet into that thick head of his, maybe this time it might stick).

[Dean_the_Young]

Flint, we were talking about the initial confrontation with Vido. Zaeed doesn't pull a gun on you until well after that, and Shepard's choice let's Vido get away.