ScotOfClanDonald wrote...
Thanks. Miraculous cures really bother me on a literary level.
It's pretty awesome if we fight for a cure and then fail, though. Fighting to survive even though it's hopeless is really interesting, and adds some poignancy to the story.
If Kepral's really is a death sentence, then we have to ask: do we have a chance against the galaxy's death sentence, the Reapers?
This is good storytelling. There's a right way to handle characters with a terminal illness, and a wrong way. Curing them miraculously at the eleventh hour really is the wrong way.
Which isn't to say that you can never have good drama about curing a terminal illness. In my opinion, though, the cure is often worse than the disease. On a literary level, it usually means that someone else that you care about has to die. Nothing is ever free.
So, I say let Thane die. He's more than redeemed himself already by stopping the Collectors, and he can at least go down fighting the good fight.
Did it bother you that Shepard came back from the dead? In the universe these characters live in, apparently it's possible yet you insist that it's unthinkable that Thane can get treatment for his lung disease? Even though we know that he's viable for a lung transplant?
I see people repeating the same thing "he should die because it'd be dramatic" and they completely ignore the fact that Bioware have already hinted that Thane still has options. And why do people assume curing him would be due to "fangirl" demand? Ever think that maybe they had a plan for his character from the start and that they always intended for there to be a choice depending on how the player interacted with him?
Depending on how they write it, keeping him alive has more potential because it gives them a chance to develop his character and his relationship with Shepard further. Killing him off would be a waste of a wonderful character.





Retour en haut






