Mage One wrote...
Well, a lot of us are waiting for full disclosure. In that same thread, they said they hadn't decided whether or not all the systems mentioned would be included. (This was after questions of how long the game could go without "phoning home.") So there are a good number of us who are waiting to hear the final word before we make our decision. The general impression most of us have is because they'll give the final word on DRM after the demo launches on the hopes that after playing the demo, we'll get the game despite them having put in the sort of DRM we've been hoping they won't. As I've said, I hope we're wrong because I really want to get the game, but no matter how awesome the demo is, if it has certain systems in place, I won't.
Well, at least you're an honest and rational person. Most of the people speaking outrageously about DRM have clearly played DA:O but conspiculously do not have the game under their avatar while posting, loosing any sense of credibility here. And while one could come up with a million excuses for this, I tend to believe the simple answers tend to be the correct ones more often than not.
At least you're a paying customer. I'm not sure why so man of the other protestors think anyone should care about their opinion on this matter if they didn't bother to pay to play the game in the first place.
Anyways, while I personally think DRM is completely ineffective, I also have had no personal issues with it. I don't really care if they are collecting private information from me or if I have to be connected to the internet or any of a million other reasons people give for disliking DRM. I've never had a game stop working because of DRM-no matter how draconian-either, though I'm aware such posts always spring up of these issues happening.
But, since I do think DRM is completely ineffective, as people brought up in the age of Google who believe everything in life should be "free" are probably going to pirate a game, DRM or not, I'd think companies would save a lot of angst if they just didn't bother with it. DRM, all by itself, is rarely-if ever-the reason someone decided to pirate a game, despite all the self-righteous "DRM is evil, and I'm going to pirate to show you!!!" comments on the internet. Such comments are just moral brushes individuals use to paint up their own amoral selves with so they can sleep at night. Some people will always "cheat" to get free stuff. DRM doesn't stop these people.
Lastly, the business argument that it is to protect against all that money "lost" to pirates, makes no real sense either. You can't loose money you never had to begin with, and I think it foolish in the extreme to assume every pirate would have bought your game if there was no way for them to get a hold of a pirated copy. A percent sure, but most definitely not all of them.
Modifié par kjdhgfiliuhwe, 20 février 2011 - 04:03 .