Lotion Soronnar wrote...
My my...someone has a VERY low opinion on console player.
Now personally I don't play consoles, but saying the ammo system is for "tards" is IMHO, wrong.
The overheat system is one for lazy people that don't care about tactics or realism.
Well, since your determind to bring up ammo again.
The ammo system is one for lazy people that don't care about tactics or realism.
Let me eloborate, firs the guns in this game are so unrealistic it is silly for you to even say that. First they are accelorator weapons, they use electricity to power electromagnets, and the guns are never recharged, the battires are for all intense purposes infinite in power, second the ammo system and that is what it is, even though they call it thermal clips is stupid in description. We dont have the technology to miniturize anything in those weapons so they are passed of as ....... wait, they arent even passed off as sci-fi future guns since they use a non existent element known as element zero which makes them even more UNREAL in their description, hey, wait, these guns are fantasy guns.....they dont even have to be remotly real....... lol, realism, I love when people make that argument for the way the guns work in ME2 when it is really just what they like more.
You have a video card in that PC you play on? Do you have a fan cooling it or do you eject your heat sink ever 8 hours of use and put a new one in? Do you ever cut partialy used video card heat sinks in half to reclaim the unused portion of the thermal clip....I mean heat sink? Becouse stuff never cooling off is realistic, right?
Second it is your opinion that a heat based system is for lazy people, but in fact isnt just point and shoot till it goes click, reaload repeat way of playing the real way to be lazy. Oh, you mean you dont do that? Gee, what makes the heat system lazy and untactical? Becous, in ME1 I could chose to make a gun that did great damage, but overheated quickly, or a gun that would not overheat easily but did less damage, hmmm, sounds like a tactic to me. What tactic do you use with guns in ME2, short burst? well placed head shots? well timed reloads? I can do that stuff too with a heat system except well timed reloads which can be replaced with well timed cool down piriods. I admit that the heat system could have used a little bit of balancing but we just got copy-paste version of every other games ammo system as opposed to adjustment to a
very tacticl system that needs more effort to use well, IMHO.In ME1 we got something that in my opinon meant that we got a choice in how our weapons handled, now some people make this argument that you could just spam endless auto fire at enimies and that was too easy and that makes if for lazy people, but many people feel that ME2 is already easy. All you really have to do is go to cover, shoot a little, reload, shoot some more, reload, shoot some more, let your shields recover.......wait, arent these systems really similar except instead of reloading I could be letting my gun cool off?
No, they are not, becouse cooling off is diffrent, and people dont like diffrent stuff, they want regerating health, which isnt realistic BTW, and they want unused "ammo" which is actualy "unused thermal clip" to be shuffled back into the pool of shots they get, what would be realistic is if you eject a thermal clip with 10 shots remaining, then those 10 shots go on the ground and you dont get them back, but it seems that shuffling those back in is ....... lazy, for lazy people, who prefer a lazy system.
Now, as I mentiond feel free to disagree, but as I mentiond perhaps you could stick with just PM-ing me with your
opinions, and thats all they are, and we can keep this thread about helmets, ok?
One final note, if your of the opinion that ammo is so realistic and great, good for you, I dont care. Even though I feel I have presented facts that show that heat system is not for lazy or untactical people, you (and others) dont care becouse you cant change opinions of people like probably 90% of the time, and even if you did, they wouldnt admit that you did at the very least not right there to your face that you did infact inform them that thier opinion was poorly thought out. Mentioning that somthing lacks tactics is an opinion, pointing out that you can change the statistics of a gun to suit your taste for high DPS but low sustaind fire, or high sustaind fire but low DPS is a fact. Even in the face of facts, this is the internet, and it is filled with tards that spew thir opinion with as much backing it up that opinion as .....well just that, an opinion.
So, back to helmets then?
Retour en haut
