Dean_the_Young wrote...
Paragon/Renegade analogies break down further when you start to realize that Udina, the Renegade aligned politician, has never been shown or depicted to do anything more violent than a shove, while Anderson is repeatedly depicted as a war-hero badass who relishes punching certain politicians.
Udina, the Renegade, is the compromiser who's better and more interested at maintaining good relations to humanity's own benefit. Anderson, the Paragon, is depicted as keeping Udina around to clean up those sorts of messes.
Andersson isn't a politician, therefore he doesn't really understand the whole diplomacy thing. He hasn't studied Citadel politics and is only there becacuse Shepard didn't feel like putting another politician on the Council. This is also one of the reasons why he keeps getting pushed down by the other Councillors (my theory at least).
I put Udina on the Council and I don't understand why that's the renegade choice. He's a born politician and understand human interests.
I also agree that the Ascension does not make sense when it comes to military forces. The turians had the largest scale of ships protecting the Citadel so their loss of numbers is understandable. However, they are a military race and even if they're "weakened" I doubt they're so weak they can't come back from that.
That said, I still believe the salarians are the biggest threat.





Retour en haut





