202 réponses à ce sujet

[HTTP 404]

AwesomeEffect2 wrote...

thatbwoyblu wrote...

mgs00 wrote...

We all know single player is effected if multiplayer was added. All single player games suck huge wang when multiplayer is present and this is a fact and facts aren't wrong. If you want a multiplayer game then beg EA/Bioware for a multiplayer game in a new series but leave this series the hell alone with that crap.

Was Dead Space 2 effected?Nope

I didn't play Dead Space 2 yet but I heard that the multiplayer is stupid.

Im sure they just slapped it on just to satisfy EA requirement.  But I dont think it affected the single player

[JamieCOTC]

Gleym wrote...

*Imagines it*

Oh wow, guess I won't be buying ME3 then if it's gonna suck that badly.

Ha! 

[Tamahome560]

Imagine ME3 with multiplayer ....  

(Don't mind if they make a multiplayer spin-off)

[Vanguard Of Destruction]

In response to this thread my answer would be....No. Mass Effect 3 does not need multiplayer. End of

[MrDizazta]

I do not want multiplayer, in the intial release of the game. If the game was to have a multiplayer or even a co-op package, then it should be release after that game's intial release as a dlc or expansion. It will give the main studio time to work on the game while the second studio can work on the mp so it doesn't destroy the main game's story.

[ZombifiedJake]

Imagining it without it is much better.

[Element_Zero]

Why do I get the feeling that some of these MP threads / stuff is coming from hype and gaming bloggers. . .

Ok look. . . Dead Space 2. . . 10 hours? isn't that what I've been told for the single story side?
I also seem to be seeing some rumblings. . . about something *humm* ah yes the unevenness of the PVP MP. . . and the game has been on the shelves for how long? 3 days? $60 bucks is quite a charge humm???

I can't wait for you MP guys to start peeing yourselves when the industry as a whole starts charging you a monthly $ just to get access to use MP for each game. I've seen some well done server banks in my time. . .

Take for example WestLaw has a beautiful setup. 4 huge generators, a huge battery room, huge HVAC + humidity control room, and all for the lovely climate controlled server room. So I know how much the servers and a proper support structure can cost. It's big bucks . . . and while some companies are farming out to the industry in lease or rent space per ___ it's still a fee to be absorbed by the software's sales that will eventually be turned into subscription fees. Why is it done this way? Well ask yourselves a question. . . Just how many complained when MoH servers got tied up? Don't you think companies are going to worry about sales of their software if there isn't a stable server bank? Think about how much money you loose each hour / day when the very hub of these events goes down or your not charging for the MP service?

The above is just one of the reasons is why I keep saying. . keep it out of ME 3. . .

There is too much potential to have it hurt the overall story development and it will not surprise me if implemented MP it ends up a disappointment and wasted development time with additional fees to be absorbed by the buyer. I've read more than enough threads on MP concerns in other forums about various games out there. And the Industry as a whole continues to show that innovative development gets pushed to the wayside once MP is installed, since for some reason someone. . somewhere decides these things are not important anymore.

What do I mean by innovative development? Single player time ends up cut or is never expanded,  AI development and improvement vanish, multipathing is forgotten, campaigns end up a cycle of wash rinse / repeat thus never improved, stories are throttled back, we end up bland avatars / classes, powers / weapons classes are gutted and equalized, even some playstyles are forced . . . And while not a innovative development but a set back. . . some within the industry release these games + tacked on MP with a large amount of glitches / bugs.

Any team working on the Mass Effect 3 falls under the budget / time allocated for development and final costs of the game.

Hells bells just this stuff  - VoIP communication and anti-hacking MP software takes time to impliment /
install even if it is bought 3 party or created 'in house' and is also
something that has to be absorbed by the buyer. Course that is 'if' they decide to incorporate those things at all!

If they do decide it's absolutely necessary, I still say make it a stand alone game based in the Mass Effect Universe, this way that development time can be better spent on putting something you MPers want together. Some of you want PVP - MP, some of you want Co-Op MP. . . and all the goodies surrounding those things take time to really do right.

[The7Sins]

If ME3 had multiplayer then there would be a high probability of the game's story and gameplay suffering in order to implement it. As such ME3 would then be an even bigger fail than ME2. As such if Bioware has any foresight and common sense they will not implement multiplayer in ME3 and instead concentrate on the game's story and gameplay. If the Mass Effect series must have a multiplayer then make it in a spinoff game not in ME3.

[Nicodemus]

ME3 with Multiplayer? No, don't want it. AN ME spin off game with MP later, sure, could be fun. The only thing I would accept is if they released ME3 as a proper single player game and perhaps provide and expansion that implements a Co-op feature. Other than that, keep MP out of ME3.

[Shadesofsiknas]

Multiplayer in ME3 makes baby Jesus cry.

[bjdbwea]

If you want to play a multiplayer game, there are countless multiplayer games for you to choose from. You do not need to wait for ME 3.

[Guitar-Hero]

No thank you
and every time you ask that question a puppy dies.. of dehydration.. from crying.. you don't want to kil puppies do you?

honestly for me, this seems as redundant as putting move or kinect in it

Modifié par Steffen, 29 janvier 2011 - 01:10 .

[CanadAvenger]

Imagine Mass Effect 3 with multiplayer...

IT BURNNSSSSSSS! IT BUUUURRRRRRRNNNSSSSS!!!!!!!!


Seriously, NO multiplayer for ME3. That's not what the game is about. Even coop is pushing it. It's not needed. Go away.

<_<

[SammyJB17]

Troubled, this person is.

[Assasin4Hire]

do some of you guys really think people who have never played ME1 or 2 will buy 3 merely because it has MP?



That being said I don't really care if there's MP or not. If there is I can always play it while I wait for DLC, if there isnt I can replay the Single Player with a new class

[raynbow]

Steffen wrote...

No thank you
and every time you ask that question a puppy dies.. of dehydration.. from crying.. you don't want to kil puppies do you?

honestly for me, this seems as redundant as putting move or kinect in it

this made me sad face D;

in response to this thread:

[Destroy Raiden_]

I did and it sucks. No yet again to multiplayer.

[Harmless Crunch]

I can see nearly everybody is against it but think about it "An asari commando ejects a thermal clip from her avenger assault rifle with custom incendiary ammo as she takes cover only to be shot in the head from a Widow anti-material rifle, the sniper is noticed by another asari who uses pull combined with concussion shot to kill the sniper when out of nowhere a Krogan rams into the asari"

[Ramirez Wolfen]

If there is multiplayer, I won't be mad at Bioware. I will be angry with EA FOR MAKING THEM HAVE STUPID MULTIPLAYER SO THEY CAN COMPETE WITH CALL OF DUTY. Just saying.

[Gleym]

Harmless Crunch wrote...

I can see nearly everybody is against it but think about it "An asari commando ejects a thermal clip from her avenger assault rifle with custom incendiary ammo as she takes cover only to be shot in the head from a Widow anti-material rifle, the sniper is noticed by another asari who uses pull combined with concussion shot to kill the sniper when out of nowhere a Krogan rams into the asari"

Meanwhile, this is what's going on in the chat of that description:
"fkn camper!!!111"
"lol nt my prb if u cant play te gaem n00b!"
"omg can anybody help me? im laggin bad
"gtfo"
"lolololol i can ttly c mi asaris @ss!!"
"quit hoggin the missile launcher you f*kin rocket wh*re!!!!!!"
"lrn2play b*tch"
"wtf dis krogans t-bagn me D; D;  D;"

[Guitar-Hero]

Gleym wrote...

Harmless Crunch wrote...

I can see nearly everybody is against it but think about it "An asari commando ejects a thermal clip from her avenger assault rifle with custom incendiary ammo as she takes cover only to be shot in the head from a Widow anti-material rifle, the sniper is noticed by another asari who uses pull combined with concussion shot to kill the sniper when out of nowhere a Krogan rams into the asari"

Meanwhile, this is what's going on in the chat of that description:
"fkn camper!!!111"
"lol nt my prb if u cant play te gaem n00b!"
"omg can anybody help me? im laggin bad
"gtfo"
"lolololol i can ttly c mi asaris @ss!!"
"quit hoggin the missile launcher you f*kin rocket wh*re!!!!!!"
"lrn2play b*tch"
"wtf dis krogans t-bagn me D; D;  D;"

im sorry.. What?

[Shadesofsiknas]

Harmless Crunch wrote...

I can see nearly everybody is against it but think about it "An asari commando ejects a thermal clip from her avenger assault rifle with custom incendiary ammo as she takes cover only to be shot in the head from a Widow anti-material rifle, the sniper is noticed by another asari who uses pull combined with concussion shot to kill the sniper when out of nowhere a Krogan rams into the asari"

And then somebody uses the adrenaline rush and we all have to move in slo-mo so he can have time dialation. But Im still in the fight. I line up a shot on the Krogan....and bam he pulls up his power wheel to apply an ammo mod. Wish he would hurry up.

Sounds like ME multiplayer to me.

Multiplayer wont work with MEs combat. To make it work you would need to dilute the combat and it would not be half as good as the combat in ME2.

I play online shooters. Theyre fun. I dont play ME for pew pew. I play it for RPG mixed with some pew pew. I play it for its story and characters. Yknow the things that we all love in Bioware games. I play ME more than any game because its different and that makes it special.
If they dilute the combat, make the game shorter or take resources from it in anyway ME will become generic shooter with empty online multiplayer servers. The only people who will be playing it in six months will be the same Bioware faithful who are on these forums and love ME for the reasons listed above.
But the tragedy is that they will have a lesser game for it and they will forever harbour a sadness in their heart that ME was **** on with a MP.

[emanziboy]

Gleym wrote...

Harmless Crunch wrote...

I can see nearly everybody is against it but think about it "An asari commando ejects a thermal clip from her avenger assault rifle with custom incendiary ammo as she takes cover only to be shot in the head from a Widow anti-material rifle, the sniper is noticed by another asari who uses pull combined with concussion shot to kill the sniper when out of nowhere a Krogan rams into the asari"

Meanwhile, this is what's going on in the chat of that description:
"fkn camper!!!111"
"lol nt my prb if u cant play te gaem n00b!"
"omg can anybody help me? im laggin bad
"gtfo"
"lolololol i can ttly c mi asaris @ss!!"
"quit hoggin the missile launcher you f*kin rocket wh*re!!!!!!"
"lrn2play b*tch"
"wtf dis krogans t-bagn me D; D;  D;"

Not really, at least as far as xbox live is concerned. Half of your team won't have mics, and the other half will be in separate party chats, throwing any chance of competent team strategy out the window.

[emanziboy]

Shadesofsiknas wrote...

And then somebody uses the adrenaline rush and we all have to move in slo-mo so he can have time dialation. But Im still in the fight. I line up a shot on the Krogan....and bam he pulls up his power wheel to apply an ammo mod. Wish he would hurry up.

You clearly have no idea how online multiplayer works, do you?