This is getting moved to Spoilers now, of course.
Shadow_Viper, you may mean well, but posting about posting spoilers in a thread you think has spoilers is doing nothing other than bumping the thread to the top where more people get to see it has spoilers. Best just to ignore it and allow the moderators to move them as they see them.
And please, don't clutter up threads with discussions that are off-topic (that's to everyone that participated).
Redcliffe - serious locksmiths (very minor spoiler)
Débuté par
KingTazzo
, nov. 14 2009 02:17
Retour en haut
#52
Posté 14 novembre 2009 - 02:00
KingTazzo
-
- Members
- 30 messages
Kevin Lynch wrote...
This is getting moved to Spoilers now, of course.
Of course it is, since it contains far less spoilers than many threads on the general forum that haven't been moved. It seems the standard school of moderation that dictates it's not what your thread contains but who kicks up a fuss about it is in effect here too. I guess I could go and report half the threads on the General forum for containing spoilers to prove my point but I'm not quite that petty.
#53
Posté 14 novembre 2009 - 02:58
crossover.attack
-
- Members
- 35 messages
Really? What was the spoiler again?
Since the moderators have so much time on their hands, perhaps some of you can start weeding through the near endless references to "Dragons" and other end game plot references that are littering the other discussions. I don't see any here. Perhaps the original complaintent has a handy list for you. Someone hijacks a legitimate discussion and you have justified their behavior by aquiescing to their request, your stern rebuke aside.
The original question was valid, discussed information relating to a game mechanic not addressed in the instruction manual, and gave nothing away about the plot. Now it is unlikely to be seen. You certainly won't find it using the search function.
Since the moderators have so much time on their hands, perhaps some of you can start weeding through the near endless references to "Dragons" and other end game plot references that are littering the other discussions. I don't see any here. Perhaps the original complaintent has a handy list for you. Someone hijacks a legitimate discussion and you have justified their behavior by aquiescing to their request, your stern rebuke aside.
The original question was valid, discussed information relating to a game mechanic not addressed in the instruction manual, and gave nothing away about the plot. Now it is unlikely to be seen. You certainly won't find it using the search function.
#54
Posté 14 novembre 2009 - 06:23
Kevin Lynch
-
- Members
- 1 874 messages
If you see spoilers, definitely, tell one of the badzillion moderators listed at the top of the general forum. I tend to spend most of my time just moving spoilers, and the fact that you don't notice is because they are being moved quickly enough so we don't have people complaining about those ones, which is how it should be. It's not automagically happening, you know; we have to read them first.
And read the post just before my last one if you want to see a spoiler. Thanks.
And read the post just before my last one if you want to see a spoiler. Thanks.
#55
Posté 14 novembre 2009 - 10:19
KingTazzo
-
- Members
- 30 messages
Kevin Lynch wrote...
And read the post just before my last one if you want to see a spoiler. Thanks.
I'll take your word on that one - didn't read much of that particular post for the very reason of spoilers since I'm still on my first playthrough!
