tmp7704 wrote...
Both Irving and Eamon have the advantage of knowing when the main army performs the attack, as well as where this attack actually takes place. After Alistair quits, he's out of this loop -- he might well be in Redcliffe where the battle was originally expected to happen, or on his way to the capital city, or even long dead after trying to storm the castle entirely on his own.TeenZombie wrote...
If Alistair had left your party, for instance, once you chose to let Loghain live, and shown up in the final battle the way Irving or Eamon does, I would understand.
If he actually did show up in that final battle... that'd quite cheapen the whole split thing during Landsmeet imo as it'd make it easy to "eat the cake and still keep it" getting both Loghain and Alistair. As it is, it's left up the the player's imagination what happens to Alistair. That plenty people are so quick to write him off and decide he'd completely quit the fight... it's interesting as it doesn't show much faith in him.
I see your point, but the epilogue slideshow clearly said he went off somewhere to be a raving drunk. Like I said before, I never play evil characters, or epic douchebags, so I would never choose Loghain, but it's kind of sad that that is how it plays out. It *ought* to be different, just like choosing Harrowmont and allowing the Chantry into Orzammar *ought* to be "good" choices.
Anyway, judging Alistair's entire character by a choice he *could* make at the end is pretty lame. He *could* run off, or he *could* gallantly sacrifice his life for you and the kingdom. Loghain, on the other hand, is definitely a slaver, murderer, poisoner, and would-be despot who almost destroys the kingdom. Choosing him over Alistair because Alistair won't *listen* to you . . . uh, yeah, I don't get it.





Retour en haut







