And the issue revolves around Maric giving Alistair up to Eamon.
The purpose of the thread is to put Maric's giving away of Alistair to Eamon under scrutiny. I argue it's very imprudent. And to speculate on possible backroom politics involving the entire issue, specifically sending Alistair away to the Chantry.
Now am I the only one who finds this very unwise and bordering on stupid?
The whole point of giving Alistair up is to keep him away from politics, for his own safety and that of the kingdom. Sending him to one of the most powerful nobles in the land seems to be doing the opposite. And for a very crucial factor that a king should consider: The political situation in Ferelden.
What are the facts:
- Ferelden is still very unstable, if the Landsmeets after the occupation are any indication and competition is practically the norm. Anything can destabilize it.
- The Guerrins arranged a political marriage with the Therins, via Rowan, to strengthen their alliance and mutual interests. With Rowan dead prematurely, the Guerrins don't get out of the war with much, except Redcliffe which is theirs by right and that is despite the sacrifice of the late Arl.
- Compared to this, the Mac Tirs rose through the ranks monumentally. Loghain became Teyrn. Not only that, his daughter was groomed to be Queen. I doubt Eamon was unaware that Loghain practically lives in Denerim. So it's obvious who is going to have more influence with Maric's heir, Cailan.
- Alistair can be used as a weapon to destablize the system and challenge Cailan (more or less succesfully, depends on how it's played). That's the whole reason why Maric opted to abandon him, he was a threat to Ferelden's stability.
Now all these factors taken into consideration, does giving Alistair to Eamon sound like a wise thing to do?
What if Eamon is unsatisfied with the status quo? I mean the Guerreins, especially after Rowan's death, didn't get much compared to the Mac Tirs. In an environment of competition between feudal lords and families, one can only assume that Eamon is hardly disinterested and potentially feels threatened by what can be percieved as Mac Tirian encroachement. Maric is giving him a potentially destabilizing weapon.
Now some will mention trust and that Maric basically trusts Eamon. Barring the fact that I believe being too trusting of anyone to be a major flaw, especially when dealing with politics, can Maric say with absolute certainty that Eamon is trustworthy and that he will ignore what's happening around him? With all the facts I've listed, this sounds like a recipee for disaster.
Maybe that's only me, but a king should attempt to consider all possible scenarios and base predictions on current factors, especially when it comes to something that will be very crucial after his death. This is the fate of an entire nation we are talking about and not only a child. All things considered, giving Alistair to Eamon is very unwise and imprudent. Assuming that loyalty is going to overcome material realities, in issues like this, is imprudent and bordering on political idiocy. Maric can't know Eamon's motives and I am not asking him to kill Eamon based on suspicions. What I am expecting hwoever is for a king to understand the political reality around him and suspect that his feudal lords are self-interested first and foremost especially when it comes to something that will come into play after his death. With that in mind, no prudent mind would give a weapon to a lord that has very strong (and valid) reasons to be dissatisfied.
Now I personally believe that it was Eamon who jumped at the opportunity and volunteered to take Alistair over. Could be due to inexplicable blind loyalty. I find it more likely however that a cunning politician like Eamon was maneuvring to get "political cards". Which leads me to the theory that Eamon did not want to send Alistair away to the Chantry. While yes Alistair would get some education there (and brainwashing), a lyrium addicted and brainwahshed king does not sound like a good idea and that's assuming that Eamon can demand that the Chantry returns Alistair to him. I find it unlikely, considering that Duncan had to use the seldomly used Right of Conscription to get him out. So I personally think that Eamon sending Alistair to the Chantry as a plan B, hoping that he can retrieve him later to be unlikely.
What I find more likely is that Eamon was pressured to abandon Alistair to the Chantry. And not by Isolde. If it was Isolde's whining, Eamon could have done something different and less drastic. Which leads me to believe that he was pressured to by an outside force. The more likely candidate is Loghain, or Loghain via Maric. If Eamon really decided to throw away a very powerful tool like that because Isolde didn't like it, then Eamon is much less intelligent than I thought.
It is my opinion that Maric was not really the main actor here, but was being played around by Eamon and Loghain. Either that, or he consciensly and soberly decided to give alsitair away to Eamon, virtually ignoring all political realities and possibilities. In the context of a politically arranged marriage since childhood, Eamon's status as brother-in-law is pretty irrelevent, especially when Rowan died. So in either case, Maric comes off in a pretty bad light and imo, displays below average intelligence expected from a king.
So what are your thoughts?
Do you think Maric acted prudently when giving his son away to a very powerful nobleman who can be disastified with the status quo, in an attempt to remove him from politics completely?
And do you think there was more at play in sending Alistair away to the Chantry, than Isolde complaining?
And the purpose of the thread is not to villify Eamon. I am respecting him more and more and I can only understand his possible dissatisfaction with the status quo. Not that he did much personally to deserve more, it was his father who did, but still.
Modifié par KnightofPhoenix, 30 janvier 2011 - 03:52 .





Retour en haut








